Cardiopulmonary and stress responses of xylazine, acepromazine or midazolam sedated West African dwarf goats to different body positioning

B. B. Foluso, A. Adeniran
{"title":"Cardiopulmonary and stress responses of xylazine, acepromazine or midazolam sedated West African dwarf goats to different body positioning","authors":"B. B. Foluso, A. Adeniran","doi":"10.5897/jvmah2022.0966","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"West African Dwarf (WAD) goats are important source of animal protein, ubiquitous in rural Nigerian households and undergo necessary surgical procedures. Induction of general anaesthesia in goats is associated with resultant severe systemic side effects due to position-induced stress. This study investigated cardiopulmonary and stress responses of WAD goats to three sedatives in different body positioning. Six adult WAD bucks, weighing 11±2.0 kg were randomly selected for three separate experiments using of xylazine (0.05 mg/kg), acepromazine (0.2 mg/kg) or midazolam (0.3 mg/kg) intramuscularly in five clinical trials lasting five days each. Goats were restrained in standing (control), Right Lateral (RL), Left Lateral (LL), supine and prone positions. Venous blood (5 ml) via jugular venipuncture was collected before and after each sedation to determine selected stress biomarkers [blood glucose (mg/dL), plasma cortisol (mmol/L) and lactate dehydrogenase LDH (U/L)]. Heart Rate-HR (beats/min), Respiratory Rate-RR (breaths/min), Mean Arterial Pressure-MAP (mmHg), Oxygenhaemoglobin Saturation-SpO2 (%) and Rectal Temperature -RT (°C) were measured at intervals of 10 min for 1 h. Bucks were rested for 14 days in between clinical trials. Data were analysed using descriptive statistics and ANOVA at p<0.05. In LL, supine and prone body positions, peak blood glucose levels and plasma cortisol, respectively were significantly increased with xylazine, acepromazine and midazolam compared to control. Plasma levels of LDH were significantly decreased compared to control for the RL, LL, supine and prone positions with xylazine and acepromazine sedation. Acepromazine and Midazolam had highest HR with supine position. Xylazine sedation resulted in severe hypotension and hyperglycaemia with LL and supine body positions whereas acepromazine and midazolam sedation resulted in mild hypotension and increased heart rate with LL and prone body positions. The LL and prone positioning should be used cautiously in caprine sedation. Acepromazine and midazolam were found to be safer alternatives to xylazine.","PeriodicalId":17608,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Health","volume":"1972 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5897/jvmah2022.0966","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

West African Dwarf (WAD) goats are important source of animal protein, ubiquitous in rural Nigerian households and undergo necessary surgical procedures. Induction of general anaesthesia in goats is associated with resultant severe systemic side effects due to position-induced stress. This study investigated cardiopulmonary and stress responses of WAD goats to three sedatives in different body positioning. Six adult WAD bucks, weighing 11±2.0 kg were randomly selected for three separate experiments using of xylazine (0.05 mg/kg), acepromazine (0.2 mg/kg) or midazolam (0.3 mg/kg) intramuscularly in five clinical trials lasting five days each. Goats were restrained in standing (control), Right Lateral (RL), Left Lateral (LL), supine and prone positions. Venous blood (5 ml) via jugular venipuncture was collected before and after each sedation to determine selected stress biomarkers [blood glucose (mg/dL), plasma cortisol (mmol/L) and lactate dehydrogenase LDH (U/L)]. Heart Rate-HR (beats/min), Respiratory Rate-RR (breaths/min), Mean Arterial Pressure-MAP (mmHg), Oxygenhaemoglobin Saturation-SpO2 (%) and Rectal Temperature -RT (°C) were measured at intervals of 10 min for 1 h. Bucks were rested for 14 days in between clinical trials. Data were analysed using descriptive statistics and ANOVA at p<0.05. In LL, supine and prone body positions, peak blood glucose levels and plasma cortisol, respectively were significantly increased with xylazine, acepromazine and midazolam compared to control. Plasma levels of LDH were significantly decreased compared to control for the RL, LL, supine and prone positions with xylazine and acepromazine sedation. Acepromazine and Midazolam had highest HR with supine position. Xylazine sedation resulted in severe hypotension and hyperglycaemia with LL and supine body positions whereas acepromazine and midazolam sedation resulted in mild hypotension and increased heart rate with LL and prone body positions. The LL and prone positioning should be used cautiously in caprine sedation. Acepromazine and midazolam were found to be safer alternatives to xylazine.
木嗪、乙酰丙嗪和咪达唑仑对西非矮山羊不同体位的心肺和应激反应的影响
西非矮山羊(WAD)是动物蛋白的重要来源,在尼日利亚农村家庭中随处可见,并接受必要的外科手术。由于体位诱导应激,对山羊进行全身麻醉会产生严重的全身副作用。本研究研究了WAD山羊在不同体位下对三种镇静剂的心肺和应激反应。选取体重11±2.0 kg的成年WAD雄鹿6只,分为3组,分别肌肉注射噻嗪(0.05 mg/kg)、乙酰丙嗪(0.2 mg/kg)和咪达唑仑(0.3 mg/kg),共5组,每组5 d。山羊被限制为站立(对照)、右侧卧位(RL)、左侧卧位(LL)、仰卧位和俯卧位。每次镇静前后通过颈静脉穿刺采集静脉血(5 ml),测定选定的应激生物标志物[血糖(mg/dL)、血浆皮质醇(mmol/L)和乳酸脱氢酶(U/L)]。心率- hr(心跳/分钟)、呼吸率- rr(呼吸/分钟)、平均动脉压- map (mmHg)、氧血红蛋白饱和度- spo2(%)和直肠温度-RT(°C)每隔10分钟测量1小时。雄犬在两次临床试验之间休息14天。资料分析采用描述性统计和方差分析,p<0.05。在仰卧位和俯卧位中,与对照组相比,羟嗪、乙酰丙嗪和咪达唑仑分别显著提高了血糖峰值和血浆皮质醇水平。与对照组相比,使用噻嗪和乙酰丙嗪镇静的左卧位、左卧位、仰卧位和俯卧位的血浆LDH水平显著降低。仰卧位时,乙酰丙嗪和咪达唑仑的HR最高。二甲嗪镇静导致左卧位和仰卧位的严重低血压和高血糖,而乙酰丙嗪和咪达唑仑镇静导致左卧位和俯卧位的轻度低血压和心率增加。镇静时应谨慎使用俯卧位。乙酰丙嗪和咪达唑仑被发现是比噻嗪更安全的替代品。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信