Comparative assessment of competitiveness and external costs of electric car and car with internal combustion engine (on the example of Moscow)

A. V. Baraboshkina
{"title":"Comparative assessment of competitiveness and external costs of electric car and car with internal combustion engine (on the example of Moscow)","authors":"A. V. Baraboshkina","doi":"10.35854/1998-1627-2023-4-423-434","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim. To carry out a comparative evaluation of the competitiveness of electric car and car with internal combustion engine (ICE) of the middle price segment and their external costs on the example of Moscow.Tasks. To describe the methodology and estimate the total cost of ownership of an electric car “Moskvich 3e” and its gasoline counterpart “Moskvich 3”; calculate the external costs of an electric car and a gasoline-powered car related to greenhouse gas emissions and air pollutants; estimate the total cost for society.Methods. In order to compare the competitiveness of cars with different types of engines, the method of total cost of ownership was used; in the aspect of obtaining the total cost for society by economic evaluation of emissions, the external costs associated with climate change and air pollution were calculated.Results. Currently, the total cost of five-year ownership of electric car “Moskvich 3e” is higher in comparison with the car “Moskvich 3” practically by 461 thousand rubles, even taking into account the existing support measures in Moscow. The difference in external costs due to greenhouse gas emissions and air pollutants is about 68.3 thousand rubles. The electric car is more environmentally friendly and contributes less to climate change. The difference in the total cost of five-year ownership of an electric car “Moskvich 3e” and its gasoline analogue, taking into account the external costs (total cost for society) is 392 thousand rubles. This means that the internalization of external costs may slightly increase the competitiveness of the electric car.Conclusions. The study will allow potential buyers to assess the real affordability of vehicles of interest to them, in particular vehicles “Moskvich 3” and “Moskvich 3e”. The obtained results may serve as a basis for further development of support measures for electric motor vehicles in Moscow, for example, when calculating the amount of subsidy necessary to ensure the competitiveness of electric cars of the medium price segment.","PeriodicalId":101258,"journal":{"name":"Transport Economics and Management","volume":"42 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transport Economics and Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35854/1998-1627-2023-4-423-434","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Aim. To carry out a comparative evaluation of the competitiveness of electric car and car with internal combustion engine (ICE) of the middle price segment and their external costs on the example of Moscow.Tasks. To describe the methodology and estimate the total cost of ownership of an electric car “Moskvich 3e” and its gasoline counterpart “Moskvich 3”; calculate the external costs of an electric car and a gasoline-powered car related to greenhouse gas emissions and air pollutants; estimate the total cost for society.Methods. In order to compare the competitiveness of cars with different types of engines, the method of total cost of ownership was used; in the aspect of obtaining the total cost for society by economic evaluation of emissions, the external costs associated with climate change and air pollution were calculated.Results. Currently, the total cost of five-year ownership of electric car “Moskvich 3e” is higher in comparison with the car “Moskvich 3” practically by 461 thousand rubles, even taking into account the existing support measures in Moscow. The difference in external costs due to greenhouse gas emissions and air pollutants is about 68.3 thousand rubles. The electric car is more environmentally friendly and contributes less to climate change. The difference in the total cost of five-year ownership of an electric car “Moskvich 3e” and its gasoline analogue, taking into account the external costs (total cost for society) is 392 thousand rubles. This means that the internalization of external costs may slightly increase the competitiveness of the electric car.Conclusions. The study will allow potential buyers to assess the real affordability of vehicles of interest to them, in particular vehicles “Moskvich 3” and “Moskvich 3e”. The obtained results may serve as a basis for further development of support measures for electric motor vehicles in Moscow, for example, when calculating the amount of subsidy necessary to ensure the competitiveness of electric cars of the medium price segment.
电动汽车与内燃机汽车竞争力及外部成本比较评估(以莫斯科为例)
的目标。以莫斯科为例,对电动汽车和中价位内燃机汽车的竞争力及其外部成本进行比较评估。描述电动汽车“Moskvich 3e”和汽油车“Moskvich 3”的方法并估计拥有的总成本;计算一辆电动汽车和一辆汽油动力汽车与温室气体排放和空气污染物相关的外部成本;估计社会的总成本。为了比较不同型号发动机汽车的竞争力,采用了总拥有成本法;在通过排放经济评价获得社会总成本方面,计算了与气候变化和大气污染相关的外部成本。目前,即使考虑到莫斯科现有的支持措施,电动汽车“莫斯科3e”的五年总拥有成本也比汽车“莫斯科3”高出46.1万卢布。温室气体排放和空气污染物造成的外部成本差异约为6.83万卢布。电动汽车更环保,对气候变化的影响更小。考虑到外部成本(社会总成本),电动汽车“Moskvich 3e”和汽油类似物五年所有权的总成本差异为39.2万卢布。这意味着外部成本的内部化可能会略微增加电动汽车的竞争力。这项研究将使潜在购买者能够评估他们感兴趣的车辆的实际负担能力,特别是“莫斯科3”和“莫斯科3e”车辆。获得的结果可以作为莫斯科进一步制定电动汽车支持措施的基础,例如,在计算确保中等价位电动汽车竞争力所需的补贴金额时。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信