Studies on Neisseria gonorrhoeae strains from test-of-cure specimens. Correlation between the in vitro susceptibility to penicillin and the sensitivity to the complement-dependent bactericidal activity of normal and convalescent human serum.

L. Odum, I. Lind
{"title":"Studies on Neisseria gonorrhoeae strains from test-of-cure specimens. Correlation between the in vitro susceptibility to penicillin and the sensitivity to the complement-dependent bactericidal activity of normal and convalescent human serum.","authors":"L. Odum, I. Lind","doi":"10.1111/J.1699-0463.1982.TB00097.X","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Sixty-seven out of 88 Neisseria gonorrhoeae strains isolated from test-of-cure (TOC) specimens during a five-months' period were included in the study. For 62 patients sufficient information was obtained in order to distinguish between relapse (34 ptt) and re-infection (28 ptt). For comparison with strains from these two groups of patients, 63 urogenital and 21 pharyngeal gonococcal strains isolated during the same period of time were randomly selected. The distributions according to susceptibility to penicillin for TOC strains and control strains corresponded to those found for the total number of TOC strains (275) and other strains (3,345) tested in 1979, respectively. The TOC strains did not differ from the control strains in sensitivity to the complement-dependent. The TOC strains did not differ from the control strains in sensitivity to the complement-dependent bactericidal activity of normal human serum. However, gonococcal strains less susceptible to penicillin in vitro (MIC values within the range 0.1-2.0 microgram/ml) were significantly more sensitive to the complement-dependent activity of normal human serum (P less than 0.01) than strains fully susceptible to penicillin (MIC less than 0.01 microgram/ml.) Penicillin-resistant strains (MIC greater than 2.0 microgram/ml) did not differ from strains susceptible to less than 0.1 microgram penicillin/ml and were slightly more serum-resistant than the less susceptible strains (P less than 0.05). No difference in serum-sensitivity of urogenital and pharyngeal isolates could be demonstrated. The level of bactericidal activity of homologous convalescent serum was unrelated to the presence of antibodies either to gonococcal pili or crude gonococcal antigen preparations. The sensitivity to normal human serum of a certain strain was not correlated with sensitivity to homologous convalescent serum.","PeriodicalId":7045,"journal":{"name":"Acta pathologica, microbiologica, et immunologica Scandinavica. Section B, Microbiology","volume":"11 19 1","pages":"145-52"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-08-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta pathologica, microbiologica, et immunologica Scandinavica. Section B, Microbiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1699-0463.1982.TB00097.X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Sixty-seven out of 88 Neisseria gonorrhoeae strains isolated from test-of-cure (TOC) specimens during a five-months' period were included in the study. For 62 patients sufficient information was obtained in order to distinguish between relapse (34 ptt) and re-infection (28 ptt). For comparison with strains from these two groups of patients, 63 urogenital and 21 pharyngeal gonococcal strains isolated during the same period of time were randomly selected. The distributions according to susceptibility to penicillin for TOC strains and control strains corresponded to those found for the total number of TOC strains (275) and other strains (3,345) tested in 1979, respectively. The TOC strains did not differ from the control strains in sensitivity to the complement-dependent. The TOC strains did not differ from the control strains in sensitivity to the complement-dependent bactericidal activity of normal human serum. However, gonococcal strains less susceptible to penicillin in vitro (MIC values within the range 0.1-2.0 microgram/ml) were significantly more sensitive to the complement-dependent activity of normal human serum (P less than 0.01) than strains fully susceptible to penicillin (MIC less than 0.01 microgram/ml.) Penicillin-resistant strains (MIC greater than 2.0 microgram/ml) did not differ from strains susceptible to less than 0.1 microgram penicillin/ml and were slightly more serum-resistant than the less susceptible strains (P less than 0.05). No difference in serum-sensitivity of urogenital and pharyngeal isolates could be demonstrated. The level of bactericidal activity of homologous convalescent serum was unrelated to the presence of antibodies either to gonococcal pili or crude gonococcal antigen preparations. The sensitivity to normal human serum of a certain strain was not correlated with sensitivity to homologous convalescent serum.
淋病奈瑟菌治愈试验标本的研究。正常和恢复期人血清中青霉素体外敏感性与补体依赖性杀菌活性敏感性的相关性。
在5个月的时间里,从治愈试验(TOC)标本中分离出的88株淋病奈瑟菌中有67株被纳入了这项研究。对于62例患者,获得了足够的信息以区分复发(34 ptt)和再感染(28 ptt)。随机选取同期分离的泌尿生殖道淋球菌63株和咽淋球菌21株,与两组患者的淋球菌进行比较。TOC菌株和对照菌株对青霉素的敏感性分布与1979年TOC总菌株(275株)和其他菌株(3345株)的检测结果一致。TOC菌株对补体依赖菌的敏感性与对照菌株无明显差异。TOC菌株与对照菌株对正常人血清补体依赖性杀菌活性的敏感性无明显差异。然而,体外对青霉素不敏感的淋球菌菌株(MIC值在0.1 ~ 2.0微克/ml范围内)对正常人血清补体依赖活性的敏感性(P < 0.01)显著高于对青霉素完全敏感的菌株(MIC < 0.01微克/ml)。青霉素耐药菌株(MIC大于2.0微克/毫升)与对小于0.1微克/毫升青霉素敏感的菌株无显著差异,其血清耐药程度略高于不敏感菌株(P < 0.05)。泌尿生殖道和咽部分离株的血清敏感性没有差异。同源恢复期血清的杀菌活性水平与淋球菌毛抗体或淋球菌粗抗原制剂的存在无关。某菌株对正常人血清的敏感性与对同类恢复期血清的敏感性无相关性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信