Keeping Chance in Its Place: The Socio-Legal Regulation of Gambling

Kate Bedford, Donal Casey, Alexandra Flynn
{"title":"Keeping Chance in Its Place: The Socio-Legal Regulation of Gambling","authors":"Kate Bedford, Donal Casey, Alexandra Flynn","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1319","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the winter of 2010, driving through a blizzard to a research interview outside of Ottawa, one of the co-editors of this special issue—Kate Bedford—slid and spun off the road in her rental car. The interviewee—an 80-year-old man who organized a small weekly bingo game—helped dig her out. Sitting in the community centre with him afterwards, thawing, there was ample opportunity for Bedford to reflect on the diverse meanings attached to gambling and the complex ways in which it is regulated. The interviewee talked about ‘use of proceeds’ forms and validating expenses payments for volunteers, describing a gambling landscape that seemed a long way from dominant law and policy conversations. While commentators on the global financial crisis were drawing repeated analogies to casinos and poker, the less glamourous world of small-town bingo seemed to have slipped from view. This special issue is, in part, an effort to bring it back. \n \nIn 2013, inspired by research in Ontario, Bedford began work on a large, international research grant into gambling regulation. Rather than focusing on relatively well-researched forms of gambling, such as casinos, the project centred bingo as a distinctively under-studied gambling sector. The second co-editor, Donal Casey, joined the initiative in 2015, believing that online gambling could provide a crucial new lens for his research into European Union (“EU”) law and regulation. As part of the research project, Bedford, Casey, and others convened a conference at the University of Kent in 2016 on socio-legal approaches to gambling, where scholars from nine countries and a number of disciplines presented their research. The seven papers that we have collected in this special issue are drawn from that conference, including one from our third co-editor, Alexandra Flynn. \n \nIn this Introduction to the collection, we lay out what these papers offer to the field of gambling research and beyond. To begin, we identify the scholarly approaches to gambling upon which we wish to build (Part I). Then, we specify three contributions we seek to make through our socio-legal endeavors. First, this collection seeks to foreground the diverse, vernacular forms and places of play that are sometimes overlooked in gambling scholarship (Part II). Second, the papers take a distinctive pluralist approach that recognizes the multi-layered character of gambling regulation (Part III). Third, and finally, the interdisciplinary and methodologically-diverse nature of this special issue allows the papers, alongside the contributions in the Voices and Perspectives section, to speak to a wide range of debates within and outside academia (Part IV).","PeriodicalId":89609,"journal":{"name":"Northwestern journal of law and social policy","volume":"1975 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-11-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Northwestern journal of law and social policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.60082/0829-3929.1319","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

In the winter of 2010, driving through a blizzard to a research interview outside of Ottawa, one of the co-editors of this special issue—Kate Bedford—slid and spun off the road in her rental car. The interviewee—an 80-year-old man who organized a small weekly bingo game—helped dig her out. Sitting in the community centre with him afterwards, thawing, there was ample opportunity for Bedford to reflect on the diverse meanings attached to gambling and the complex ways in which it is regulated. The interviewee talked about ‘use of proceeds’ forms and validating expenses payments for volunteers, describing a gambling landscape that seemed a long way from dominant law and policy conversations. While commentators on the global financial crisis were drawing repeated analogies to casinos and poker, the less glamourous world of small-town bingo seemed to have slipped from view. This special issue is, in part, an effort to bring it back. In 2013, inspired by research in Ontario, Bedford began work on a large, international research grant into gambling regulation. Rather than focusing on relatively well-researched forms of gambling, such as casinos, the project centred bingo as a distinctively under-studied gambling sector. The second co-editor, Donal Casey, joined the initiative in 2015, believing that online gambling could provide a crucial new lens for his research into European Union (“EU”) law and regulation. As part of the research project, Bedford, Casey, and others convened a conference at the University of Kent in 2016 on socio-legal approaches to gambling, where scholars from nine countries and a number of disciplines presented their research. The seven papers that we have collected in this special issue are drawn from that conference, including one from our third co-editor, Alexandra Flynn. In this Introduction to the collection, we lay out what these papers offer to the field of gambling research and beyond. To begin, we identify the scholarly approaches to gambling upon which we wish to build (Part I). Then, we specify three contributions we seek to make through our socio-legal endeavors. First, this collection seeks to foreground the diverse, vernacular forms and places of play that are sometimes overlooked in gambling scholarship (Part II). Second, the papers take a distinctive pluralist approach that recognizes the multi-layered character of gambling regulation (Part III). Third, and finally, the interdisciplinary and methodologically-diverse nature of this special issue allows the papers, alongside the contributions in the Voices and Perspectives section, to speak to a wide range of debates within and outside academia (Part IV).
把握机会:赌博的社会法律规制
2010年冬天,本特刊的一位联合编辑凯特·贝德福德(kate bedford)开车冒着暴风雪前往渥太华郊外接受调查采访,她开着租来的车滑出了路面。一位80岁的老人组织了一个每周一次的小型宾果游戏,帮助她找到了答案。之后,贝德福德和他一起坐在社区中心,放松心情,有足够的机会反思赌博的各种含义,以及监管赌博的复杂方式。这位受访者谈到了“使用收益”表格和核实志愿者的费用支付,并描述了一个似乎与主流法律和政策对话相去甚远的赌博环境。就在全球金融危机的评论人士不断将其与赌场和扑克相提并论的时候,不那么迷人的小镇宾果游戏似乎已经从人们的视野中消失了。在某种程度上,本期特刊就是为了让它回归。2013年,受安大略省研究的启发,贝德福德开始了一项关于赌博监管的大型国际研究资助。该项目没有把重点放在研究相对充分的赌博形式上,比如赌场,而是把宾果游戏作为一个明显研究不足的赌博部门。第二位联合编辑多纳尔·凯西(Donal Casey)于2015年加入该计划,他认为在线赌博可以为他对欧盟法律法规的研究提供一个至关重要的新视角。作为研究项目的一部分,Bedford、Casey等人于2016年在肯特大学召开了一场关于赌博的社会法律方法的会议,来自9个国家和多个学科的学者展示了他们的研究成果。我们在本期特刊中收集的七篇论文来自那次会议,其中一篇来自我们的第三位联合编辑亚历山德拉·弗林(Alexandra Flynn)。在本文集的介绍中,我们列出了这些论文对赌博研究领域和其他领域的贡献。首先,我们确定了我们希望建立的赌博学术方法(第一部分)。然后,我们指定了我们试图通过社会法律努力做出的三个贡献。首先,本合集旨在突出赌博学术中有时被忽视的多样化、方言形式和游戏场所(第二部分)。其次,这些论文采用了独特的多元主义方法,认识到赌博监管的多层次特征(第三部分)。第三,也是最后,这一期特刊的跨学科和方法论多样性使得这些论文,以及“声音和观点”部分的贡献,就学术界内外的广泛辩论发表意见(第四部分)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信