Intellectual Dynamics of Good Governance Studies: A Bibliometric Analysis

Q3 Business, Management and Accounting
Fauzan, A. Jahja
{"title":"Intellectual Dynamics of Good Governance Studies: A Bibliometric Analysis","authors":"Fauzan, A. Jahja","doi":"10.22146/JIEB.V36I2.1411","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction/Main Objectives: This study presents a bibliometric analysis of good governance research publications from the Scopus database from 1984 to 2020. Background Problems: Since ​​good governance has an essential and central role in organizations, the research trends on good governance in the literature need to be revealed. Novelty: To the best of our knowledge, bibliometric analysis for the term good governance is not yet available. This paper aims to fill in the gap by providing a broad overview of the bibliometric analysis of the literature relating to this term. Research Methods: Good governance is used as a keyword in the titles of articles taken from the Scopus database on November 4, 2020. There were 1,954 documents analyzed. Microsoft Excel is used for frequency analysis, the VOSviewer app is used for the data’s visualization, and Harzing's Publish or Perish is used for citation metrics and analysis. Finding/Results: The results showed an increase in the growth rate of good governance literature from 1984 to 2020, particularly since 2011. Conclusion: Research related to corporate governance has involved various authors, and is published in various languages. There are 159 authors from 123 countries and 160 institutions. The United States is the most significant contributor to this study, followed by the United Kingdom and Indonesia. The International Review of Administrative Sciences has published the most papers on good governance. Our findings indicate that studies on good governance are mostly carried out in the field of social sciences.","PeriodicalId":31597,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Indonesian Economy and Business","volume":"40 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Indonesian Economy and Business","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22146/JIEB.V36I2.1411","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Business, Management and Accounting","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Introduction/Main Objectives: This study presents a bibliometric analysis of good governance research publications from the Scopus database from 1984 to 2020. Background Problems: Since ​​good governance has an essential and central role in organizations, the research trends on good governance in the literature need to be revealed. Novelty: To the best of our knowledge, bibliometric analysis for the term good governance is not yet available. This paper aims to fill in the gap by providing a broad overview of the bibliometric analysis of the literature relating to this term. Research Methods: Good governance is used as a keyword in the titles of articles taken from the Scopus database on November 4, 2020. There were 1,954 documents analyzed. Microsoft Excel is used for frequency analysis, the VOSviewer app is used for the data’s visualization, and Harzing's Publish or Perish is used for citation metrics and analysis. Finding/Results: The results showed an increase in the growth rate of good governance literature from 1984 to 2020, particularly since 2011. Conclusion: Research related to corporate governance has involved various authors, and is published in various languages. There are 159 authors from 123 countries and 160 institutions. The United States is the most significant contributor to this study, followed by the United Kingdom and Indonesia. The International Review of Administrative Sciences has published the most papers on good governance. Our findings indicate that studies on good governance are mostly carried out in the field of social sciences.
善治研究的智力动态:文献计量学分析
前言/主要目的:本研究对1984年至2020年Scopus数据库中的善治研究出版物进行了文献计量分析。背景问题:由于善治在组织中具有重要和核心的作用,因此需要揭示文献中关于善治的研究趋势。新颖性:据我们所知,还没有对“良好治理”一词进行文献计量分析。本文旨在通过提供与此术语相关的文献计量学分析的广泛概述来填补空白。研究方法:Good governance作为关键词出现在取自Scopus数据库的文章标题中,日期为2020年11月4日。共分析了1954份文件。使用Microsoft Excel进行频率分析,使用VOSviewer应用程序进行数据可视化,使用Harzing的Publish or Perish进行引用指标和分析。发现/结果:结果显示,从1984年到2020年,特别是自2011年以来,善治文献的增长率有所增加。结论:与公司治理相关的研究涉及不同的作者,并以多种语言出版。共有来自123个国家和160个机构的159位作者。美国是这项研究的最大贡献者,其次是英国和印度尼西亚。《国际行政科学评论》发表的关于善治的论文最多。我们的研究结果表明,关于善治的研究大多在社会科学领域进行。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Indonesian Economy and Business
Journal of Indonesian Economy and Business Business, Management and Accounting-Business, Management and Accounting (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
18
审稿时长
21 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书