Diagnostic yield and safety of medical thoracoscopic versus CT guided percutaneous tru-cut pleural biopsy

Gehan Hassan Ali Abo E-Magd, Ahmad Abouissa, I. Abbass
{"title":"Diagnostic yield and safety of medical thoracoscopic versus CT guided percutaneous tru-cut pleural biopsy","authors":"Gehan Hassan Ali Abo E-Magd, Ahmad Abouissa, I. Abbass","doi":"10.1183/13993003.congress-2019.pa3085","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Pleural effusion is considered the most common presentation of pleural diseases; around 50% of cases of pleural effusion remain undiagnosed following thoracentesis. Purpose: To compare between the diagnostic accuracy, safety and complications of medical thoracoscopic (MT) versus CT guided (CTG) tru-cut pleural biopsy. Patients and Methods: The patients with unexplained exudative pleural effusion were classified into two groups for either MT or CTG tru-cut pleural biopsy. The pleural biopsies obtained during both procedures were sent for mycobacterial culture and histopathology. Results: Complications of MT were pain in 6 (20%), prolonged air leak in 2 (6.7%) and subcutaneous emphysema in 2 (6.7%) patients. While the complications of CT guided pleural biopsy were pain in 3 (10%) and pneumothorax in 2 (6.7%) patients with no significant difference. Length of hospital stay was 5.13 ± 1.63 in MT and 2.83 ± 1.23 in CTG group; the difference was highly significant (P Conclusions: Medical thoracoscopy and CT guided pleural biopsy are safe techniques with high diagnostic yield and low complication rate; However, MT was slightly more sensitive than CTG biopsy besides its therapeutic role. On the other hand, CT guided biopsy has a shorter hospital stay than thoracoscopic technique. Proper selection of the procedure will increase the diagnostic value of each procedure.","PeriodicalId":20113,"journal":{"name":"Pleural and Mediastinal Malignancies","volume":"16 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pleural and Mediastinal Malignancies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1183/13993003.congress-2019.pa3085","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Introduction: Pleural effusion is considered the most common presentation of pleural diseases; around 50% of cases of pleural effusion remain undiagnosed following thoracentesis. Purpose: To compare between the diagnostic accuracy, safety and complications of medical thoracoscopic (MT) versus CT guided (CTG) tru-cut pleural biopsy. Patients and Methods: The patients with unexplained exudative pleural effusion were classified into two groups for either MT or CTG tru-cut pleural biopsy. The pleural biopsies obtained during both procedures were sent for mycobacterial culture and histopathology. Results: Complications of MT were pain in 6 (20%), prolonged air leak in 2 (6.7%) and subcutaneous emphysema in 2 (6.7%) patients. While the complications of CT guided pleural biopsy were pain in 3 (10%) and pneumothorax in 2 (6.7%) patients with no significant difference. Length of hospital stay was 5.13 ± 1.63 in MT and 2.83 ± 1.23 in CTG group; the difference was highly significant (P Conclusions: Medical thoracoscopy and CT guided pleural biopsy are safe techniques with high diagnostic yield and low complication rate; However, MT was slightly more sensitive than CTG biopsy besides its therapeutic role. On the other hand, CT guided biopsy has a shorter hospital stay than thoracoscopic technique. Proper selection of the procedure will increase the diagnostic value of each procedure.
医用胸腔镜与CT引导下经皮胸膜穿刺活检的诊断率和安全性
简介:胸腔积液被认为是胸膜疾病最常见的表现;约50%的胸腔积液病例在胸腔穿刺后仍未确诊。目的:比较内科胸腔镜(MT)与CT引导(CTG)胸膜真切活检的诊断准确性、安全性及并发症。患者与方法:将原因不明的渗出性胸腔积液患者分为两组,分别行MT或CTG真切胸膜活检。在这两个过程中获得的胸膜活检送去进行分枝杆菌培养和组织病理学检查。结果:MT并发症为疼痛6例(20%),漏气2例(6.7%),皮下肺气肿2例(6.7%)。CT引导下胸膜活检的并发症为疼痛3例(10%),气胸2例(6.7%),两者差异无统计学意义。MT组住院时间为5.13±1.63,CTG组住院时间为2.83±1.23;结论:内科胸腔镜和CT引导胸膜活检是一种诊断率高、并发症发生率低的安全技术;MT除具有治疗作用外,敏感性略高于CTG活检。另一方面,CT引导活检比胸腔镜技术住院时间短。正确选择手术方式将提高每项手术的诊断价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信