The Pharyngeal Airways of Patients with Class II Malocclusion: A Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Analysis

IF 0.3 Q4 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Y. Ünüvar, Fundagül Bilgiç Zortuk, T. Özer, K. Beycan
{"title":"The Pharyngeal Airways of Patients with Class II Malocclusion: A Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Analysis","authors":"Y. Ünüvar, Fundagül Bilgiç Zortuk, T. Özer, K. Beycan","doi":"10.7454/msk.v25i2.1272","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: This study aimed to compare the minimum axial (min Ax) area and the volumes of the nasopharyngeal (NP) and oropharyngeal (OP) airways of patients with Class II malocclusion with different sagittal positions of the mandible and maxilla and patients with Class I malocclusion with normal jaw positions. Methods: Airway areas and volumes of 51 patients with Class I malocclusion with normal maxillary and mandibular positions (0 < ANB < 4, 84 > SNA > 80, and 82 > SNB > 78) were compared with 21 patients with Class II malocclusion with normal maxillary and retrognathic mandibular positions (ANB>4, 84>SNA>80, and SNB<78) and 21 patients with Class II malocclusion with prognathic maxillary and normal mandibular positions (ANB>4, SNA>84, and 82>SNB>78). Results: In the comparison of airway measurements between Class I and Class II groups, significant differences were found in the OP airway volume, total airway volume, and minimum OP axial area. Patients with Class II mandibular retrusion had smaller OP airway volume. The total airway volume and min Ax area were significantly lower in the Class II mandibular retrusion group than in other groups. Conclusions: The sagittal position of the jaws affects the OP airway volume and the minimum axial airway area, but not the NP airway volume.","PeriodicalId":51994,"journal":{"name":"Makara Journal of Health Research","volume":"11 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Makara Journal of Health Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7454/msk.v25i2.1272","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: This study aimed to compare the minimum axial (min Ax) area and the volumes of the nasopharyngeal (NP) and oropharyngeal (OP) airways of patients with Class II malocclusion with different sagittal positions of the mandible and maxilla and patients with Class I malocclusion with normal jaw positions. Methods: Airway areas and volumes of 51 patients with Class I malocclusion with normal maxillary and mandibular positions (0 < ANB < 4, 84 > SNA > 80, and 82 > SNB > 78) were compared with 21 patients with Class II malocclusion with normal maxillary and retrognathic mandibular positions (ANB>4, 84>SNA>80, and SNB<78) and 21 patients with Class II malocclusion with prognathic maxillary and normal mandibular positions (ANB>4, SNA>84, and 82>SNB>78). Results: In the comparison of airway measurements between Class I and Class II groups, significant differences were found in the OP airway volume, total airway volume, and minimum OP axial area. Patients with Class II mandibular retrusion had smaller OP airway volume. The total airway volume and min Ax area were significantly lower in the Class II mandibular retrusion group than in other groups. Conclusions: The sagittal position of the jaws affects the OP airway volume and the minimum axial airway area, but not the NP airway volume.
II类错颌患者的咽气道:锥束计算机断层扫描分析
背景:本研究旨在比较下颌和上颌不同矢状位的II类错颌患者与正常颌位的I类错颌患者鼻咽(NP)和口咽(OP)气道的最小轴向(min Ax)面积和体积。方法:将51例ⅰ类错颌正常体位(0 < ANB < 4、84>SNA>80、82>SNB>78)患者与21例ⅱ类错颌正常体位(ANB>4、84>SNA>80、SNB4、SNA>84、82>SNB>78)患者气道面积和容积进行比较。结果:I类组与II类组气道测量比较,上呼吸道容积、气道总容积、上呼吸道最小轴向面积均有显著差异。II类下颌骨后缩患者上颌气道体积较小。II类下颌骨后缩组气道总容积和最小Ax面积明显低于其他组。结论:下颌矢状位对上颌口气道容积和最小轴向气道面积有影响,对上颌口气道容积无影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Makara Journal of Health Research
Makara Journal of Health Research MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
20
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信