Neural-Machine-Translation-Based Commit Message Generation: How Far Are We?

Zhongxin Liu, Xin Xia, A. Hassan, D. Lo, Zhenchang Xing, Xinyu Wang
{"title":"Neural-Machine-Translation-Based Commit Message Generation: How Far Are We?","authors":"Zhongxin Liu, Xin Xia, A. Hassan, D. Lo, Zhenchang Xing, Xinyu Wang","doi":"10.1145/3238147.3238190","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Commit messages can be regarded as the documentation of software changes. These messages describe the content and purposes of changes, hence are useful for program comprehension and software maintenance. However, due to the lack of time and direct motivation, commit messages sometimes are neglected by developers. To address this problem, Jiang et al. proposed an approach (we refer to it as NMT), which leverages a neural machine translation algorithm to automatically generate short commit messages from code. The reported performance of their approach is promising, however, they did not explore why their approach performs well. Thus, in this paper, we first perform an in-depth analysis of their experimental results. We find that (1) Most of the test diffs from which NMT can generate high-quality messages are similar to one or more training diffs at the token level. (2) About 16% of the commit messages in Jiang et al.'s dataset are noisy due to being automatically generated or due to them describing repetitive trivial changes. (3) The performance of NMT declines by a large amount after removing such noisy commit messages. In addition, NMT is complicated and time-consuming. Inspired by our first finding, we proposed a simpler and faster approach, named NNGen (Nearest Neighbor Generator), to generate concise commit messages using the nearest neighbor algorithm. Our experimental results show that NNGen is over 2,600 times faster than NMT, and outperforms NMT in terms of BLEU (an accuracy measure that is widely used to evaluate machine translation systems) by 21%. Finally, we also discuss some observations for the road ahead for automated commit message generation to inspire other researchers.","PeriodicalId":6622,"journal":{"name":"2018 33rd IEEE/ACM International Conference on Automated Software Engineering (ASE)","volume":"2 1","pages":"373-384"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"168","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2018 33rd IEEE/ACM International Conference on Automated Software Engineering (ASE)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3238147.3238190","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 168

Abstract

Commit messages can be regarded as the documentation of software changes. These messages describe the content and purposes of changes, hence are useful for program comprehension and software maintenance. However, due to the lack of time and direct motivation, commit messages sometimes are neglected by developers. To address this problem, Jiang et al. proposed an approach (we refer to it as NMT), which leverages a neural machine translation algorithm to automatically generate short commit messages from code. The reported performance of their approach is promising, however, they did not explore why their approach performs well. Thus, in this paper, we first perform an in-depth analysis of their experimental results. We find that (1) Most of the test diffs from which NMT can generate high-quality messages are similar to one or more training diffs at the token level. (2) About 16% of the commit messages in Jiang et al.'s dataset are noisy due to being automatically generated or due to them describing repetitive trivial changes. (3) The performance of NMT declines by a large amount after removing such noisy commit messages. In addition, NMT is complicated and time-consuming. Inspired by our first finding, we proposed a simpler and faster approach, named NNGen (Nearest Neighbor Generator), to generate concise commit messages using the nearest neighbor algorithm. Our experimental results show that NNGen is over 2,600 times faster than NMT, and outperforms NMT in terms of BLEU (an accuracy measure that is widely used to evaluate machine translation systems) by 21%. Finally, we also discuss some observations for the road ahead for automated commit message generation to inspire other researchers.
基于神经机器翻译的提交信息生成:我们走了多远?
提交消息可以被视为软件更改的文档。这些消息描述了变更的内容和目的,因此对于程序理解和软件维护非常有用。然而,由于缺乏时间和直接动机,提交消息有时会被开发人员忽略。为了解决这个问题,Jiang等人提出了一种方法(我们称之为NMT),它利用神经机器翻译算法从代码中自动生成简短的提交消息。据报道,他们的方法的表现是有希望的,然而,他们没有探讨为什么他们的方法表现良好。因此,在本文中,我们首先对他们的实验结果进行了深入的分析。我们发现(1)NMT可以生成高质量消息的大多数测试差异类似于令牌级别的一个或多个训练差异。(2) Jiang等人的数据集中大约16%的提交消息是嘈杂的,因为它们是自动生成的,或者因为它们描述了重复的琐碎变化。(3)在去除这些有噪声的提交消息后,NMT的性能下降了很多。此外,NMT复杂且耗时。受第一个发现的启发,我们提出了一种更简单、更快的方法,称为NNGen(最近邻生成器),使用最近邻算法生成简洁的提交消息。我们的实验结果表明,NNGen比NMT快2600多倍,并且在BLEU(一种广泛用于评估机器翻译系统的精度度量)方面优于NMT 21%。最后,我们还讨论了自动化提交消息生成的一些观察结果,以激励其他研究人员。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信