Development of forecast information for institutional decision-makers: landslides in India and cyclones in Mozambique

Q2 Social Sciences
{"title":"Development of forecast information for institutional decision-makers: landslides in India and cyclones in Mozambique","authors":"","doi":"10.5194/gc-2021-31","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract. There remains a gap between the production of scientifically robust forecasts, and the translation of these forecasts into useful information such as daily \"bulletins\" for decision-makers in early warning systems. There is significant published literature on best practice to communicate risk information, but very little to guide and provide advice on the process of how these bulletins have been, or should be, developed. This paper reviews two case studies where bulletins were developed for national and district-level government agencies and humanitarian responders: daily reports in response to Cyclones Idai and Kenneth in Mozambique, and prototype landslide forecast bulletins in Nilgiris and Darjeeling Districts of India. Primary data was collected from producers and intermediaries of the bulletins via interview, and secondary data analysed on: iterative changes in the bulletin development; minutes from internal discussions; and feedback from users to extract learning on both the content and process of developing the bulletins. There were significant similarities in the type of content included in the bulletins, such as the layout, choice of words, and use of visualisation that was consistent with published best practices. Both case studies experienced challenges dealing with uncertainty, complexity, and whether to include advice. There were also similarities in the processes and approaches taken to develop the bulletins. Both case studies took an iterative approach, developed feedback mechanisms, benefitted from experienced multi-disciplinary teams, emphasised the need for strong inter-relationships, and the importance and value of preparedness and protocols. A major challenge was the difficulty of balancing science capabilities with user needs, which did not become significantly easier to deal with given more time availability. The findings indicate that whilst more research is needed into existing or best practice processes to develop content for forecast bulletins, there is an existing body of experiential and intuitive knowledge and learning that already exists but is not yet captured in an appropriate format that could be of significant interest and value to those developing forecast information. This paper goes some way to capturing some of the learning from translating scientific forecasts into useful information, in particular on both the content and the process of developing forecast bulletins for decision-making.\n","PeriodicalId":52877,"journal":{"name":"Geoscience Communication","volume":"56 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geoscience Communication","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-2021-31","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Abstract. There remains a gap between the production of scientifically robust forecasts, and the translation of these forecasts into useful information such as daily "bulletins" for decision-makers in early warning systems. There is significant published literature on best practice to communicate risk information, but very little to guide and provide advice on the process of how these bulletins have been, or should be, developed. This paper reviews two case studies where bulletins were developed for national and district-level government agencies and humanitarian responders: daily reports in response to Cyclones Idai and Kenneth in Mozambique, and prototype landslide forecast bulletins in Nilgiris and Darjeeling Districts of India. Primary data was collected from producers and intermediaries of the bulletins via interview, and secondary data analysed on: iterative changes in the bulletin development; minutes from internal discussions; and feedback from users to extract learning on both the content and process of developing the bulletins. There were significant similarities in the type of content included in the bulletins, such as the layout, choice of words, and use of visualisation that was consistent with published best practices. Both case studies experienced challenges dealing with uncertainty, complexity, and whether to include advice. There were also similarities in the processes and approaches taken to develop the bulletins. Both case studies took an iterative approach, developed feedback mechanisms, benefitted from experienced multi-disciplinary teams, emphasised the need for strong inter-relationships, and the importance and value of preparedness and protocols. A major challenge was the difficulty of balancing science capabilities with user needs, which did not become significantly easier to deal with given more time availability. The findings indicate that whilst more research is needed into existing or best practice processes to develop content for forecast bulletins, there is an existing body of experiential and intuitive knowledge and learning that already exists but is not yet captured in an appropriate format that could be of significant interest and value to those developing forecast information. This paper goes some way to capturing some of the learning from translating scientific forecasts into useful information, in particular on both the content and the process of developing forecast bulletins for decision-making.
为机构决策者开发预报信息:印度的山体滑坡和莫桑比克的飓风
摘要在制作科学上可靠的预报和将这些预报转化为有用的信息,如预警系统中决策者的每日“公报”之间仍然存在差距。关于沟通风险信息的最佳实践,已经发表了大量的文献,但很少有关于如何或应该如何制定这些公告的过程的指导和建议。本文回顾了为国家和区级政府机构和人道主义救援人员编写公报的两个案例研究:莫桑比克“伊代”和“肯尼斯”气旋应对的每日报告,以及印度尼尔吉里斯和大吉岭地区的滑坡预测公报原型。通过访谈从公告的生产者和中介机构收集第一手数据,并分析了二级数据:公告发展的迭代变化;内部讨论记录;以及来自用户的反馈,以提取关于开发公告的内容和过程的学习。公告中包含的内容类型有显著的相似之处,例如布局、词汇选择和可视化的使用,这些都与已发布的最佳实践相一致。两个案例研究都遇到了处理不确定性、复杂性和是否包括建议的挑战。制定公告的过程和方法也有相似之处。这两个案例研究都采用了迭代方法,建立了反馈机制,受益于经验丰富的多学科团队,强调了牢固的相互关系的必要性,以及准备和协议的重要性和价值。一个主要的挑战是平衡科学能力和用户需求的困难,即使有更多的时间可用性,这个问题也没有变得容易得多。研究结果表明,虽然需要对现有的或最佳实践过程进行更多的研究,以开发预测公报的内容,但已有的经验和直觉知识和学习体系已经存在,但尚未以适当的格式捕获,这可能对开发预测信息的人有重大的兴趣和价值。本文在一定程度上获取了将科学预测转化为有用信息的一些经验,特别是在为决策编制预测公报的内容和过程方面。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Geoscience Communication
Geoscience Communication Social Sciences-Communication
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
26
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信