Kotaro Takeda, Marc Hansen, Y. Ikenoue, T. Nagasaka
{"title":"Bibliometric Analysis of Academic Journals in the Area of Materials Science and Engineering for the Benchmarking of Materials Transactions","authors":"Kotaro Takeda, Marc Hansen, Y. Ikenoue, T. Nagasaka","doi":"10.2320/JINSTMET.J2021003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Bibliometric analysis has been conducted against eight representative academic journals, Materials Transactions, Acta Materialia, Scripta Materialia, Journal of Alloys and Compounds, Metallurgical and Materials Transactions A, Materials Science and Engineering A, ISIJ International and Science and Technology of Advanced Materials in order to make clear and benchmark the current status of Materials Transactions in the area of materials science and engineering. The status of each journal has been analyzed and comprehensively discussed based on the annual trend of number of published papers, citation per paper, journal impact factor, number and country a ffi liations of authors, rate of zero – citation articles and so forth. The major conclusions are as following: ( 1 ) the decrease in zero – citation articles in Material Transactions and ISIJ International is very slower against passed time than other six journals, and thus approximately 3 of papers in Material Transactions published in remain un – cited. One of the of may be self – by the themselves. ( The average number of references per paper in Material Transactions and ISIJ is less than in the The of the references are generally cited in the introductory part in to review the explain the originality of their research. These results suggest that the coverage of previous papers and the claim of the expected impact given by their research may be insu ffi cient and thus give a negative e ff ect on the citation for Material Transactions. [ doi:10.2320 / jinstmet.J2021003 ] ( )","PeriodicalId":17322,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Japan Institute of Metals and Materials","volume":"47 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Japan Institute of Metals and Materials","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2320/JINSTMET.J2021003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Bibliometric analysis has been conducted against eight representative academic journals, Materials Transactions, Acta Materialia, Scripta Materialia, Journal of Alloys and Compounds, Metallurgical and Materials Transactions A, Materials Science and Engineering A, ISIJ International and Science and Technology of Advanced Materials in order to make clear and benchmark the current status of Materials Transactions in the area of materials science and engineering. The status of each journal has been analyzed and comprehensively discussed based on the annual trend of number of published papers, citation per paper, journal impact factor, number and country a ffi liations of authors, rate of zero – citation articles and so forth. The major conclusions are as following: ( 1 ) the decrease in zero – citation articles in Material Transactions and ISIJ International is very slower against passed time than other six journals, and thus approximately 3 of papers in Material Transactions published in remain un – cited. One of the of may be self – by the themselves. ( The average number of references per paper in Material Transactions and ISIJ is less than in the The of the references are generally cited in the introductory part in to review the explain the originality of their research. These results suggest that the coverage of previous papers and the claim of the expected impact given by their research may be insu ffi cient and thus give a negative e ff ect on the citation for Material Transactions. [ doi:10.2320 / jinstmet.J2021003 ] ( )
对Materials Transactions、Acta Materialia、Scripta Materialia、Journal of Alloys and Compounds、Metallurgical and Materials Transactions A、Materials Science and Engineering A、ISIJ International、Science and Technology of Advanced Materials等8种具有代表性的学术期刊进行了文献计量分析,以明确和标杆化Materials Transactions在材料科学与工程领域的现状。从发表论文数、论文被引次数、期刊影响因子、作者数量和所属国家、论文零被引率等方面对各期刊的现状进行了分析和综合讨论。主要结论如下:(1)与其他6种期刊相比,《材料学报》和《国际ISIJ》的零被引论文减少的速度较慢,因此在《材料学报》上发表的论文约有3篇未被引。他们中的一个可能是他们自己的。(《Material Transactions》和《ISIJ》的平均每篇论文的参考文献数量比《The journal》要少,这些参考文献一般被引用在引言部分,以回顾和解释他们研究的原创性。这些结果表明,先前论文的覆盖范围和他们的研究所带来的预期影响的主张可能不够有效,从而对《材料交易》的引用产生负面影响。[doi:10.2320 / jinstmet.][2021003] ()