Adverse Selection Costs, Sequential Learning, and the Within-Wave Timing of Initial Public Offerings - Evidence from Germany

M. Petersen
{"title":"Adverse Selection Costs, Sequential Learning, and the Within-Wave Timing of Initial Public Offerings - Evidence from Germany","authors":"M. Petersen","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1017471","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper investigates whether IPO firms' characteristics associated with adverse selection costs, which are in particular proxies for asymmetric information and signaling, differ across the recent German IPO wave from 1996 to 2002. Theoretical research on sequential learning within an IPO wave suggests that issues undertaken late in a wave exhibit larger proxies for information asymmetries and apply less signaling (learning hypothesis). This issue is interesting since previous empirical research focused on explanations of whole IPO waves and \"hot issue\" markets, while dynamics within waves were neglected. In a logistic regression with early and late wave IPOs (within-wave timing) as the dependent variable, the hypothesis is clearly confirmed for asymmetric information and weakly confirmed for signaling mechanisms. The findings in the sample of 315 IPOs are not driven by the occurrence of \"hot issue\" markets, and are robust to a special consideration of industry waves and several versions of the timing variable. Although these results imply a learning process, more research is needed to generalize the findings for more IPO waves and countries.","PeriodicalId":14435,"journal":{"name":"International Strategy & Policy eJournal","volume":"3 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2007-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Strategy & Policy eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1017471","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This paper investigates whether IPO firms' characteristics associated with adverse selection costs, which are in particular proxies for asymmetric information and signaling, differ across the recent German IPO wave from 1996 to 2002. Theoretical research on sequential learning within an IPO wave suggests that issues undertaken late in a wave exhibit larger proxies for information asymmetries and apply less signaling (learning hypothesis). This issue is interesting since previous empirical research focused on explanations of whole IPO waves and "hot issue" markets, while dynamics within waves were neglected. In a logistic regression with early and late wave IPOs (within-wave timing) as the dependent variable, the hypothesis is clearly confirmed for asymmetric information and weakly confirmed for signaling mechanisms. The findings in the sample of 315 IPOs are not driven by the occurrence of "hot issue" markets, and are robust to a special consideration of industry waves and several versions of the timing variable. Although these results imply a learning process, more research is needed to generalize the findings for more IPO waves and countries.
逆向选择成本、顺序学习和首次公开募股的波内时机——来自德国的证据
本文研究了1996年至2002年德国IPO浪潮中,IPO公司与逆向选择成本相关的特征(尤其是信息和信号不对称的代表)是否存在差异。IPO浪潮中顺序学习的理论研究表明,在IPO浪潮后期进行的问题表现出更大的信息不对称代理,并且应用较少的信号(学习假设)。这个问题很有趣,因为以往的实证研究主要集中在对整个IPO浪潮和“热点”市场的解释上,而忽略了浪潮内部的动态。在以早波和晚波ipo(波内时序)为因变量的逻辑回归中,该假设在信息不对称方面得到了明确的证实,在信号机制方面得到了微弱的证实。315次ipo样本的研究结果并非由“热点发行”市场的出现所驱动,在特殊考虑行业波动和几个版本的时间变量后,结果是稳健的。虽然这些结果意味着一个学习过程,但需要更多的研究来推广更多IPO浪潮和国家的研究结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信