Cognitive dynamics

Q3 Arts and Humanities
Luca Tateo
{"title":"Cognitive dynamics","authors":"Luca Tateo","doi":"10.18680/hss.2020.0032","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The proliferation of disciplinary labels, distinctions, borders, and hierarchies is an interesting semiotic phenomenon per se. In particular, the need to circumscribe a new semiotics field and then denoting it as transdisciplinary appears instead to be an exercise of politics. One cannot but fall into the paradox of any systemic organization, nicely described by Simmel a long time before: By choosing two items from the undisturbed store of natural things in order to designate them as “separate,” we have already related them to one another in our consciousness, we have emphasized these two together against whatever lies between them. And conversely, we can only sense those things to be related which we have previously somehow isolated from one another; things must first be separated from one another in order to be together. (Simmel 1994: 5)","PeriodicalId":36248,"journal":{"name":"Punctum International Journal of Semiotics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Punctum International Journal of Semiotics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18680/hss.2020.0032","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

The proliferation of disciplinary labels, distinctions, borders, and hierarchies is an interesting semiotic phenomenon per se. In particular, the need to circumscribe a new semiotics field and then denoting it as transdisciplinary appears instead to be an exercise of politics. One cannot but fall into the paradox of any systemic organization, nicely described by Simmel a long time before: By choosing two items from the undisturbed store of natural things in order to designate them as “separate,” we have already related them to one another in our consciousness, we have emphasized these two together against whatever lies between them. And conversely, we can only sense those things to be related which we have previously somehow isolated from one another; things must first be separated from one another in order to be together. (Simmel 1994: 5)
认知的动力学
学科标签、区分、边界和等级的扩散本身就是一个有趣的符号学现象。特别是,需要限定一个新的符号学领域,然后将其表示为跨学科,而不是政治练习。人们不得不陷入任何系统组织的悖论中,很久以前,齐美尔就很好地描述了这一点:通过从自然事物的未受干扰的存储中选择两个项目,以便将它们指定为“独立的”,我们已经在我们的意识中将它们彼此联系起来,我们强调了这两个项目在一起,而不是它们之间的任何东西。相反,我们只能感觉到那些我们以前以某种方式彼此隔离的事物之间的联系;事物必须先彼此分离,才能在一起。(Simmel 1994: 5)
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Punctum International Journal of Semiotics
Punctum International Journal of Semiotics Social Sciences-Linguistics and Language
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信