Visual Outcomes of Patients With Retrobulbar Hemorrhage Undergoing Lateral Canthotomy and Cantholysis.

Lucy A. Bailey, Alexandra J van Brummen, Layla M Ghergherehchi, A. Chuang, K. Richani, M. Phillips
{"title":"Visual Outcomes of Patients With Retrobulbar Hemorrhage Undergoing Lateral Canthotomy and Cantholysis.","authors":"Lucy A. Bailey, Alexandra J van Brummen, Layla M Ghergherehchi, A. Chuang, K. Richani, M. Phillips","doi":"10.1097/IOP.0000000000001401","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PURPOSE\nEvaluate visual outcomes in relation to time from injury to intervention in patients who undergo lateral canthotomy with cantholysis (LCC) for retrobulbar hemorrhage (RBH).\n\n\nMETHODS\nRetrospective study of patients with orbital compartment syndrome (OCS) secondary to RBH who underwent LCC. OCS due to RBH was defined by a combination of decreased vision, proptosis, resistance to retropulsion, increased intraocular pressure, and relative afferent pupillary defect. Time from injury to intervention and change in visual acuity were calculated, with regression analysis identifying predictors of vision recovery.\n\n\nRESULTS\nFifteen participants were included. Three (20%) participants presented with no light perception, 7 (47%) with count fingers (CF) to light perception, and 5 (33%) with better than count fingers vision. All 5 participants who had LCC within 3 hours (twice the standard 90 minutes) gained some vision, and 6 of 10 participants who had LCC after 3 hours recovered some vision. The latest intervention with visual acuity improvement was performed 9 hours postinjury. Of 3 participants who presented with no light perception vision, 1 regained vision to 20/40 (intervention 1.7 hours postinjury), and 2 did not regain any vision (interventions at 5 and 8.7 hours postinjury). Duration from injury to intervention was associated with decreased amount of vision recovery (P = 0.03).\n\n\nCONCLUSIONS\nIncreased time to intervention with LCC was associated with less vision recovery after OCS from RBH. However, over half of participants with intervention more than 90 minutes after injury still showed visual acuity improvement. The authors recommend LCC in all patients who present with OCS regardless of the time since injury.Patients with orbital compartment syndrome may see visual recovery after lateral canthotomy and cantholysis, even if performed outside of the previously accepted 3-hour window.","PeriodicalId":19621,"journal":{"name":"Ophthalmic Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ophthalmic Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/IOP.0000000000001401","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

PURPOSE Evaluate visual outcomes in relation to time from injury to intervention in patients who undergo lateral canthotomy with cantholysis (LCC) for retrobulbar hemorrhage (RBH). METHODS Retrospective study of patients with orbital compartment syndrome (OCS) secondary to RBH who underwent LCC. OCS due to RBH was defined by a combination of decreased vision, proptosis, resistance to retropulsion, increased intraocular pressure, and relative afferent pupillary defect. Time from injury to intervention and change in visual acuity were calculated, with regression analysis identifying predictors of vision recovery. RESULTS Fifteen participants were included. Three (20%) participants presented with no light perception, 7 (47%) with count fingers (CF) to light perception, and 5 (33%) with better than count fingers vision. All 5 participants who had LCC within 3 hours (twice the standard 90 minutes) gained some vision, and 6 of 10 participants who had LCC after 3 hours recovered some vision. The latest intervention with visual acuity improvement was performed 9 hours postinjury. Of 3 participants who presented with no light perception vision, 1 regained vision to 20/40 (intervention 1.7 hours postinjury), and 2 did not regain any vision (interventions at 5 and 8.7 hours postinjury). Duration from injury to intervention was associated with decreased amount of vision recovery (P = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS Increased time to intervention with LCC was associated with less vision recovery after OCS from RBH. However, over half of participants with intervention more than 90 minutes after injury still showed visual acuity improvement. The authors recommend LCC in all patients who present with OCS regardless of the time since injury.Patients with orbital compartment syndrome may see visual recovery after lateral canthotomy and cantholysis, even if performed outside of the previously accepted 3-hour window.
球后出血患者行侧眦切开术和眦松解术的视觉效果。
目的评价因球后出血(RBH)而行侧眦切开术伴眦松解(LCC)治疗的患者从损伤到干预的时间与视力的关系。方法回顾性分析RBH继发眼眶间室综合征(OCS)行LCC的患者。RBH引起的OCS被定义为视力下降、眼球突出、抗后移、眼压升高和相对传入瞳孔缺损。计算从受伤到干预的时间和视力的变化,并通过回归分析确定视力恢复的预测因素。结果共纳入15例受试者。3名(20%)参与者没有光知觉,7名(47%)参与者有数指(CF)光知觉,5名(33%)参与者有数指以上的视觉。所有5名在3小时内(两倍于标准90分钟)患有LCC的参与者都恢复了一些视力,10名在3小时后患有LCC的参与者中有6人恢复了一些视力。视力改善的最新干预在损伤后9小时进行。在3名无光感视力的参与者中,1名视力恢复到20/40(损伤后1.7小时干预),2名未恢复任何视力(损伤后5小时和8.7小时干预)。从受伤到干预的持续时间与视力恢复的减少有关(P = 0.03)。结论LCC干预时间的延长与RBH OCS术后视力恢复的减少有关。然而,在受伤后超过90分钟的干预中,超过一半的参与者仍然表现出视力的改善。作者推荐对所有出现OCS的患者进行LCC治疗,无论损伤时间。眶间室综合征患者在侧眦切开术和眦松解术后,即使在先前接受的3小时窗口之外,也可以看到视力恢复。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信