Antioxidant and Anti Inflammation Effect of Snack Bars from Black Glutinous Rice and Pumpkin Powder

A. Mustofa, N. Suhartatik, Ega Sulistiyo Ningrum
{"title":"Antioxidant and Anti Inflammation Effect of Snack Bars from Black Glutinous Rice and Pumpkin Powder","authors":"A. Mustofa, N. Suhartatik, Ega Sulistiyo Ningrum","doi":"10.32734/INJAR.V2I3.2841","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The study was design to evaluate the antioxidant and anti-inflammatory effect of snack bars that made of black glutinous rice and pumpkin powder and study on the male Sprague Dawley rats. Twenty-five male rats in between the age of 2 and 3 months were selected and randomly divided into 5 groups, which were positive control, negative control, group with sylimarin treatment, snack bars A and snack bars B. Carbon tetrachloride was used to induce hepatic damage. The results showed that group with CCl4 treatment has 3.04 ± 0.16 μmol/L MDA while group with Sylimarin, snack bars A, snack bars B were 0.49 ± 0.05; 0.54 ± 0.05; and 1.15 ± 0.16 μmol/L MDA, respectively. The snack bars had the capacity to decline the damage in liver as much as Sylimarin (standardized natural medicine for hepatotoxicity). The SGPT (Serum Glutamin Pyruvic Transaminase) of the two treatment was 22.24 ± 0.80 U/I for Sylimarin and 22.33 ± 1.03 U/I for snack bars while SGOT (Serum Glutamic Oxaloacetic Transaminase) was 40.78 ± 0.77 U/I for Sylimarin and 40.88 ± 1.25 U/I for snack bars A. Snack bars B has a significantly different value on final SGOT and SGPT.","PeriodicalId":34255,"journal":{"name":"Indonesian Journal of Agricultural Research","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indonesian Journal of Agricultural Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32734/INJAR.V2I3.2841","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The study was design to evaluate the antioxidant and anti-inflammatory effect of snack bars that made of black glutinous rice and pumpkin powder and study on the male Sprague Dawley rats. Twenty-five male rats in between the age of 2 and 3 months were selected and randomly divided into 5 groups, which were positive control, negative control, group with sylimarin treatment, snack bars A and snack bars B. Carbon tetrachloride was used to induce hepatic damage. The results showed that group with CCl4 treatment has 3.04 ± 0.16 μmol/L MDA while group with Sylimarin, snack bars A, snack bars B were 0.49 ± 0.05; 0.54 ± 0.05; and 1.15 ± 0.16 μmol/L MDA, respectively. The snack bars had the capacity to decline the damage in liver as much as Sylimarin (standardized natural medicine for hepatotoxicity). The SGPT (Serum Glutamin Pyruvic Transaminase) of the two treatment was 22.24 ± 0.80 U/I for Sylimarin and 22.33 ± 1.03 U/I for snack bars while SGOT (Serum Glutamic Oxaloacetic Transaminase) was 40.78 ± 0.77 U/I for Sylimarin and 40.88 ± 1.25 U/I for snack bars A. Snack bars B has a significantly different value on final SGOT and SGPT.
黑糯米和南瓜粉小吃条的抗氧化和抗炎作用
本研究旨在评价黑糯米和南瓜粉制成的小食棒的抗氧化和抗炎作用,并对雄性大鼠进行研究。选取2 ~ 3月龄雄性大鼠25只,随机分为5组,分别为阳性对照组、阴性对照组、木蓟素处理组、零食A组和零食b组。结果表明:CCl4处理组MDA含量为3.04±0.16 μmol/L,水飞蓟素、小卖条A、小卖条B处理组MDA含量为0.49±0.05;0.54±0.05;MDA含量分别为1.15±0.16 μmol/L。小吃店降低肝脏损伤的能力与水飞蓟素(标准的肝毒性天然药物)相当。两种处理的血清谷氨酰胺丙酮转氨酶(SGPT)分别为22.24±0.80 U/I和22.33±1.03 U/I,而血清谷草酰乙酸转氨酶(SGOT)分别为40.78±0.77 U/I和40.88±1.25 U/I。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信