Project management reform: a public body case study

IF 1 4区 工程技术 Q4 ENGINEERING, CIVIL
A. Hamilton
{"title":"Project management reform: a public body case study","authors":"A. Hamilton","doi":"10.1680/MUEN.2004.157.3.199","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Many projects are not being delivered in accordance with predetermined requirements. Even if one could conclude that a particular project has been successful, the general record for projects is not a good one, with overruns in time and cost being commonplace. The indications are that the private sector is no worse but, quite likely, no better than the public sector. However, the public sector uses public money and, for that reason at least, the current demands for more effective management are axiomatic. This paper examines the implications that certain factors had on changing the project management approach of a public-sector organisation that uses engineers as project managers on capital works engineering projects. The results of this research, if such results can be applied to the whole sector, would indicate that the public sector is in need of reform on how it handles the project-side of its business. Greater or lesser amounts of reform would be dependent upon the project management maturity of any s...","PeriodicalId":54571,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers-Municipal Engineer","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2004-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers-Municipal Engineer","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1680/MUEN.2004.157.3.199","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Many projects are not being delivered in accordance with predetermined requirements. Even if one could conclude that a particular project has been successful, the general record for projects is not a good one, with overruns in time and cost being commonplace. The indications are that the private sector is no worse but, quite likely, no better than the public sector. However, the public sector uses public money and, for that reason at least, the current demands for more effective management are axiomatic. This paper examines the implications that certain factors had on changing the project management approach of a public-sector organisation that uses engineers as project managers on capital works engineering projects. The results of this research, if such results can be applied to the whole sector, would indicate that the public sector is in need of reform on how it handles the project-side of its business. Greater or lesser amounts of reform would be dependent upon the project management maturity of any s...
项目管理改革:公共机构案例研究
许多项目没有按照预定的要求交付。即使一个人可以断定一个特定的项目是成功的,项目的总体记录也不是很好,时间和成本超支是司空见惯的。种种迹象表明,私营部门的情况并不比公共部门差,但很可能也不比公共部门好。然而,公共部门使用公共资金,至少出于这个原因,目前对更有效管理的要求是不言自明的。本文考察了某些因素对改变公共部门组织的项目管理方法的影响,该组织在基本工程项目中使用工程师作为项目经理。这项研究的结果,如果这些结果可以应用于整个部门,将表明公共部门在如何处理其业务的项目方面需要改革。更多或更少的改革将取决于任何项目管理的成熟度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Municipal Engineer publishes international peer reviewed research, best practice, case study and project papers reports. The journal proudly enjoys an international readership and actively encourages international Panel members and authors. The journal covers the effect of civil engineering on local community such as technical issues, political interface and community participation, the sustainability agenda, cultural context, and the key dimensions of procurement, management and finance. This also includes public services, utilities, and transport. Research needs to be transferable and of interest to a wide international audience. Please ensure that municipal aspects are considered in all submissions. We are happy to consider research papers/reviews/briefing articles.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信