Evaluation of the INTERGROWTH-21st Fetal Growth Standards in the United Arab Emirates: A Pilot Study.

Biruk Hassib Narchi, Lolowa A. Almekhaini, Muna N. Alshekaili, Fatema Alshibli, S. Hamad, Ruwaya Aldhaheri, A. Souid
{"title":"Evaluation of the INTERGROWTH-21st Fetal Growth Standards in the United Arab Emirates: A Pilot Study.","authors":"Biruk Hassib Narchi, Lolowa A. Almekhaini, Muna N. Alshekaili, Fatema Alshibli, S. Hamad, Ruwaya Aldhaheri, A. Souid","doi":"10.35248/2167-0420.20.9.495","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives: To evaluate the use of recently published INTERGROWTH-21st (IG-21) fetal growth standards in United Arab Emirates native population. Method: This prospective cohort study analyzed fetal ultrasound measurements of head circumference, abdominal circumference and femur length. Z-scores and percentiles of fetal and neonatal growth measurements were calculated using IG-21 and compared with a standard reference. Results: Measurements were performed in 120 pregnancies at a median gestational age of 25.8 weeks (range, 16 to 35). Thirteen out of 15 mean IG-21 Z-scores for all measurements remained between −0.5 and +0.5 at all gestational-ages. Actual standard deviations (SD) using IG-21 charts gave an acceptable SD (0.8 to 1.2) for 13 out of 15 measurements. The proportions of most antenatal measurements 90th and >97th percentiles were identical between standard and IG-21st charts. The median gestational age was 39 weeks (range, 29 to 41) and 14 (13%) were delivered by cesarean section. The mean z-scores of all biometric measurements were close to zero while the mean percentiles were close to the 50th percentile, thus, describing appropriately the neonatal growth parameters in our population. Conclusions: Fetal size in our population was comparable to the IG-21 standards. The IG-21 neonatal growth standards were more similar to that of the anticipated population distribution than to the standard charts. These preliminary results, if confirmed in a larger study in the UAE, would support use of IG-21 standards in UAE instead of the currently used standard charts.","PeriodicalId":93471,"journal":{"name":"Journal of women's health care and management","volume":"13 1","pages":"1-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of women's health care and management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35248/2167-0420.20.9.495","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate the use of recently published INTERGROWTH-21st (IG-21) fetal growth standards in United Arab Emirates native population. Method: This prospective cohort study analyzed fetal ultrasound measurements of head circumference, abdominal circumference and femur length. Z-scores and percentiles of fetal and neonatal growth measurements were calculated using IG-21 and compared with a standard reference. Results: Measurements were performed in 120 pregnancies at a median gestational age of 25.8 weeks (range, 16 to 35). Thirteen out of 15 mean IG-21 Z-scores for all measurements remained between −0.5 and +0.5 at all gestational-ages. Actual standard deviations (SD) using IG-21 charts gave an acceptable SD (0.8 to 1.2) for 13 out of 15 measurements. The proportions of most antenatal measurements 90th and >97th percentiles were identical between standard and IG-21st charts. The median gestational age was 39 weeks (range, 29 to 41) and 14 (13%) were delivered by cesarean section. The mean z-scores of all biometric measurements were close to zero while the mean percentiles were close to the 50th percentile, thus, describing appropriately the neonatal growth parameters in our population. Conclusions: Fetal size in our population was comparable to the IG-21 standards. The IG-21 neonatal growth standards were more similar to that of the anticipated population distribution than to the standard charts. These preliminary results, if confirmed in a larger study in the UAE, would support use of IG-21 standards in UAE instead of the currently used standard charts.
intergrowth -21胎儿生长标准在阿联酋的评价:一项试点研究。
目的:评价最近发布的intergrowth -21 (IG-21)胎儿生长标准在阿联酋本地人群中的使用情况。方法:本前瞻性队列研究分析胎儿超声测量的头围、腹围和股骨长度。使用IG-21计算胎儿和新生儿生长测量的z分数和百分位数,并与标准参考进行比较。结果:对120例中位胎龄为25.8周(16 ~ 35周)的孕妇进行了测量。在所有孕龄的15例中,13例的所有测量结果的平均IG-21 z分数保持在- 0.5和+0.5之间。使用IG-21图表的实际标准偏差(SD)给出了15个测量中的13个可接受的SD(0.8到1.2)。大多数产前测量的第90百分位和>97百分位的比例在标准图和ig -21图之间相同。中位胎龄为39周(范围29 ~ 41周),14例(13%)为剖宫产。所有生物特征测量的平均z分数接近于零,而平均百分位数接近于第50百分位数,因此,适当地描述了我们人群中的新生儿生长参数。结论:我们人群的胎儿大小与IG-21标准相当。IG-21新生儿生长标准更接近于预期的人口分布,而不是标准图表。这些初步结果,如果在阿联酋进行的更大规模研究中得到证实,将支持在阿联酋使用IG-21标准,而不是目前使用的标准图表。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信