PSYCHOANALYSIS, NEUROSCIENCE, AND THE UNCONSCIOUS SELF

A. Modell
{"title":"PSYCHOANALYSIS, NEUROSCIENCE, AND THE UNCONSCIOUS SELF","authors":"A. Modell","doi":"10.1521/PREV.2012.99.4.475","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"It is appropriate that psychoanalysts should be honoring Eric Kandel, for there is a direct link between Freud’s (1895) Project for a Scientific Psychology and Kandel’s achievement. Freud (1895) anticipated the discovery of the synapse that he termed a contact barrier. He further suggested that such contact barriers might be altered permanently after a single excitation and that this process might explain memory. In a larger sense, his belief that mental processes were “in themselves unconscious” (Freud, 1915, p. 171) anticipated what has become a fundamental assumption of neuroscience. Kandel actualized what for Freud was only a thought experiment. Kandel discovered the molecular processes that occur at the synapse of the giant marine snail Aplysia. He described the molecular biology of long-term memory, confirming Freud’s belief that its explanation can be found at the synapse. However, where Freud (1895) attributed the quality of memory to different classes (permeable and impermeable) of neurons (p.302), Kandel identified the specific molecules. For a journalist’s overview of Kandel’s achievement, see Halpern (2008). Freud would later dismiss the Project as being of little value. He wrote to Fleiss, “I can no longer understand the state of mind in which I hatched out the Psychology” (Editor’s introduction, Freud, 1895, p. 285). The Project would have been lost had it not been for the efforts of Princess Marie Bonaparte, who bought the Project, along with Freud’s letters to Fleiss, from a Berlin bookseller (Gay, 1988). I suspect Freud rejected the Project when he realized that neural events were not isomorphic with psychological events. In other words, he was confronted with what philosophers","PeriodicalId":86547,"journal":{"name":"Psychoanalysis and the psychoanalytic review","volume":"65 2 1","pages":"475-483"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-08-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"11","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychoanalysis and the psychoanalytic review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1521/PREV.2012.99.4.475","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

Abstract

It is appropriate that psychoanalysts should be honoring Eric Kandel, for there is a direct link between Freud’s (1895) Project for a Scientific Psychology and Kandel’s achievement. Freud (1895) anticipated the discovery of the synapse that he termed a contact barrier. He further suggested that such contact barriers might be altered permanently after a single excitation and that this process might explain memory. In a larger sense, his belief that mental processes were “in themselves unconscious” (Freud, 1915, p. 171) anticipated what has become a fundamental assumption of neuroscience. Kandel actualized what for Freud was only a thought experiment. Kandel discovered the molecular processes that occur at the synapse of the giant marine snail Aplysia. He described the molecular biology of long-term memory, confirming Freud’s belief that its explanation can be found at the synapse. However, where Freud (1895) attributed the quality of memory to different classes (permeable and impermeable) of neurons (p.302), Kandel identified the specific molecules. For a journalist’s overview of Kandel’s achievement, see Halpern (2008). Freud would later dismiss the Project as being of little value. He wrote to Fleiss, “I can no longer understand the state of mind in which I hatched out the Psychology” (Editor’s introduction, Freud, 1895, p. 285). The Project would have been lost had it not been for the efforts of Princess Marie Bonaparte, who bought the Project, along with Freud’s letters to Fleiss, from a Berlin bookseller (Gay, 1988). I suspect Freud rejected the Project when he realized that neural events were not isomorphic with psychological events. In other words, he was confronted with what philosophers
精神分析,神经科学,以及无意识的自我
精神分析学家应该向埃里克·坎德尔致敬,这是恰当的,因为弗洛伊德(1895年)的科学心理学计划与坎德尔的成就之间存在直接联系。弗洛伊德(1895)预料到了突触的发现,他称之为接触障碍。他进一步提出,这种接触障碍可能在一次激发后永久改变,这一过程可以解释记忆。从更大的意义上说,他认为心理过程“本身是无意识的”(弗洛伊德,1915,第171页),这一信念已经成为神经科学的一个基本假设。坎德尔实现了对弗洛伊德来说只是一个思想实验的东西。坎德尔发现了发生在巨型海蜗牛突触上的分子过程。他描述了长期记忆的分子生物学,证实了弗洛伊德的信念,即它可以在突触中找到解释。然而,弗洛伊德(1895)将记忆的质量归因于不同类别的神经元(可渗透的和不可渗透的)(第302页),坎德尔确定了特定的分子。关于记者对坎德尔成就的概述,见Halpern(2008)。弗洛伊德后来认为这个项目没有什么价值,就把它驳回了。他在给弗莱斯的信中写道:“我再也不能理解我孕育出心理学的精神状态”(编辑介绍,弗洛伊德,1895年,285页)。如果不是玛丽·波拿巴公主(Marie Bonaparte)的努力,这个项目可能已经丢失了,她从柏林的一个书商那里买下了这个项目,以及弗洛伊德给弗莱斯的信(Gay, 1988)。我怀疑弗洛伊德在意识到神经事件与心理事件并非同构时拒绝了这个项目。换句话说,他面对的是哲学家
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书