Is This Part Substantial or Is It Time to Rethink the Concept of Originality in Music?

Salsalina Itha Karina
{"title":"Is This Part Substantial or Is It Time to Rethink the Concept of Originality in Music?","authors":"Salsalina Itha Karina","doi":"10.25077/nalrev.v.5.i.2.p.184-191.2022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The vagueness in the concept of originality in music has been problematic, especially relating to the enforcement of copyright. There is no definite line between ideas and the expression of an idea, which is essentially the object of copyright in music. The act of using a general concept in music could be mistaken as substantial taking and even futher a copyright infringement. The purpose of this article is to give a new perspective on the concept of originality in music, specifically in determining the act of substantial taking, and to explain why it could be time to finally rethink this concept. The research shows that the concept of substantial taking, as regulated by is Copyright Act, could hardly be applied to music due to the vagueness in the concept of originality. This reflects the necessity of a standardization for originality in music, which could be achieved through dialogues between musicologists, musicians, and other relevant professionals.","PeriodicalId":33148,"journal":{"name":"Nagari Law Review","volume":"23 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nagari Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25077/nalrev.v.5.i.2.p.184-191.2022","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The vagueness in the concept of originality in music has been problematic, especially relating to the enforcement of copyright. There is no definite line between ideas and the expression of an idea, which is essentially the object of copyright in music. The act of using a general concept in music could be mistaken as substantial taking and even futher a copyright infringement. The purpose of this article is to give a new perspective on the concept of originality in music, specifically in determining the act of substantial taking, and to explain why it could be time to finally rethink this concept. The research shows that the concept of substantial taking, as regulated by is Copyright Act, could hardly be applied to music due to the vagueness in the concept of originality. This reflects the necessity of a standardization for originality in music, which could be achieved through dialogues between musicologists, musicians, and other relevant professionals.
这部分是实质性的吗?还是该重新思考音乐创意的概念了?
音乐原创性概念的模糊性一直是个问题,特别是与版权的执行有关。在思想和思想的表达之间没有明确的界限,这是音乐版权的本质目的。在音乐中使用一般概念的行为可能会被误认为是实质性的盗用,甚至是侵犯版权。本文的目的是为音乐中的原创性概念提供一个新的视角,特别是在确定实质性采取行为时,并解释为什么现在是重新思考这个概念的时候了。研究表明,由于原创性概念的模糊性,我国《著作权法》所规定的实质取取概念难以适用于音乐。这反映了音乐原创性标准化的必要性,这可以通过音乐学家、音乐家和其他相关专业人员之间的对话来实现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信