Receptivity to a peer counselling program and recovery atmosphere as perceived by Veterans Health Administration peer support specialists and supervisors

E. Stefanovics, C. Drebing, Patricia Sweeney, M. Sofuoglu, R. Rosenheck
{"title":"Receptivity to a peer counselling program and recovery atmosphere as perceived by Veterans Health Administration peer support specialists and supervisors","authors":"E. Stefanovics, C. Drebing, Patricia Sweeney, M. Sofuoglu, R. Rosenheck","doi":"10.1080/15487768.2016.1267050","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Peer support is an important component in the promotion of recovery for people with serious mental illness. The Veterans Health Administration (VHA) has implemented peer support services nationally. This study used a series of questions about the perceived acceptance of peer services at VA facilities and the Recovery Self-Assessment (RSA), a standard measure of recovery attitudes, to evaluate and compare responses of a convenience sample of peer support specialists (PSS) and local peer supervisors (LPS). The authors hypothesized that level of receptivity of program among PSS and LPS will be high and that the scores on the five RSA domains will be comparable. The level of perceived receptivity was quite high for PSS and LPS and it was strongly correlated with recovery attitudes. Moreover, PSS scored significantly higher than LPS, on the Receptivity measure and on several domains of the RSA. RSA scores in this study were slightly higher than, or similar to, those observed in other VHA and non-VHA samples. PSS rated their programs as more receptive to peer services and more recovery oriented than their supervisors. The results of this study provide evidence of the successful implementation of this program in VHA and demonstrates an efficient approach and a first step in the evaluation of peer support services.","PeriodicalId":72174,"journal":{"name":"American journal of psychiatric rehabilitation","volume":"7 1","pages":"62 - 73"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of psychiatric rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15487768.2016.1267050","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

ABSTRACT Peer support is an important component in the promotion of recovery for people with serious mental illness. The Veterans Health Administration (VHA) has implemented peer support services nationally. This study used a series of questions about the perceived acceptance of peer services at VA facilities and the Recovery Self-Assessment (RSA), a standard measure of recovery attitudes, to evaluate and compare responses of a convenience sample of peer support specialists (PSS) and local peer supervisors (LPS). The authors hypothesized that level of receptivity of program among PSS and LPS will be high and that the scores on the five RSA domains will be comparable. The level of perceived receptivity was quite high for PSS and LPS and it was strongly correlated with recovery attitudes. Moreover, PSS scored significantly higher than LPS, on the Receptivity measure and on several domains of the RSA. RSA scores in this study were slightly higher than, or similar to, those observed in other VHA and non-VHA samples. PSS rated their programs as more receptive to peer services and more recovery oriented than their supervisors. The results of this study provide evidence of the successful implementation of this program in VHA and demonstrates an efficient approach and a first step in the evaluation of peer support services.
接受退伍军人健康管理局同伴支持专家和主管认为的同伴咨询计划和康复氛围
同伴支持是促进严重精神疾病患者康复的重要组成部分。退伍军人健康管理局(VHA)在全国范围内实施了同伴支持服务。本研究使用了一系列关于退伍军人医疗机构对同伴服务的感知接受度的问题和康复自我评估(RSA),一种衡量康复态度的标准方法,来评估和比较同伴支持专家(PSS)和当地同伴监督者(LPS)的方便样本的反应。作者假设PSS和LPS的程序接受度水平较高,并且五个RSA域的分数具有可比性。PSS和LPS患者的可接受性水平较高,且与康复态度密切相关。此外,在接受度测量和RSA的几个域上,PSS的得分明显高于LPS。本研究中的RSA评分略高于或类似于其他VHA和非VHA样本中观察到的结果。PSS认为他们的项目比他们的主管更容易接受同伴服务,更注重康复。本研究的结果为该项目在VHA的成功实施提供了证据,并展示了一种有效的方法和评估同伴支持服务的第一步。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信