Effects of Bilateral Cochlear Implantation on Binaural Listening Tasks for Younger and Older Adults

Molly Smeal, Hillary A. Snapp, S. Ausili, Meredith A. Holcomb, S. Prentiss
{"title":"Effects of Bilateral Cochlear Implantation on Binaural Listening Tasks for Younger and Older Adults","authors":"Molly Smeal, Hillary A. Snapp, S. Ausili, Meredith A. Holcomb, S. Prentiss","doi":"10.1159/000523914","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: This study investigated the objective and subjective benefit of a second cochlear implant (CI) on binaural listening tasks of speech understanding in noise and localization in younger and older adults. We aimed to determine if the aging population can utilize binaural cues and obtain comparable benefits from bilateral CI (BIL_CI) when compared to the younger population. Methods: Twenty-nine adults with severe to profound bilateral sensorineural hearing loss were included. Participants were evaluated in two conditions, better CI (BE_CI) alone and BIL_CI using AzBio and Bamford-Kowal-Bench (BKB) sentence in noise tests. Localization tasks were completed in the BIL_CI condition using a broadband stimulus, low-frequency stimuli, and high-frequency stimuli. A subjective questionnaire was administered to assess satisfaction with CI. Results: Older age was significantly associated with poorer performance on AzBio +5 dB signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and BKB-speech in noise (SIN); however, improvements from BE_CI to BIL_CI were observed across all ages. In the AzBio +5 condition, nearly half of all participants achieved a significant improvement from BE_CI to BIL_CI with the majority of those occurring in patients younger than 65 years of age. Conversely, the majority of participants who achieved a significant improvement in BKB-SIN were adults >65 years of age. Years of BIL_CI experience and time between implants were not associated with performance. For localization, mean absolute error increased with age for low and high narrowband noise, but not for the broadband noise. Response gain was negatively correlated with age for all localization stimuli. Neither BIL_CI listening experience nor time between implants significantly impacted localization ability. Subjectively, participants report reduction in disability with the addition of the second CI. There is no observed relationship between age or speech recognition score and satisfaction with BIL_CI. Conclusion: Overall performance on binaural listening tasks was poorer in older adults than in younger adults. However, older adults were able to achieve significant benefit from the addition of a second CI, and performance on binaural tasks was not correlated with overall device satisfaction. The significance of the improvement was task and stimulus dependent but suggested a critical limit may exist for optimal performance on SIN tasks for CI users. Specifically, older adults require at least a +8 dB SNR to understand 50% of speech postoperatively; therefore, solely utilizing a fixed +5 dB SNR preoperatively to qualify CI candidates is not recommended as this test condition may introduce limitations in demonstrating CI benefit.","PeriodicalId":8624,"journal":{"name":"Audiology and Neurotology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Audiology and Neurotology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000523914","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: This study investigated the objective and subjective benefit of a second cochlear implant (CI) on binaural listening tasks of speech understanding in noise and localization in younger and older adults. We aimed to determine if the aging population can utilize binaural cues and obtain comparable benefits from bilateral CI (BIL_CI) when compared to the younger population. Methods: Twenty-nine adults with severe to profound bilateral sensorineural hearing loss were included. Participants were evaluated in two conditions, better CI (BE_CI) alone and BIL_CI using AzBio and Bamford-Kowal-Bench (BKB) sentence in noise tests. Localization tasks were completed in the BIL_CI condition using a broadband stimulus, low-frequency stimuli, and high-frequency stimuli. A subjective questionnaire was administered to assess satisfaction with CI. Results: Older age was significantly associated with poorer performance on AzBio +5 dB signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and BKB-speech in noise (SIN); however, improvements from BE_CI to BIL_CI were observed across all ages. In the AzBio +5 condition, nearly half of all participants achieved a significant improvement from BE_CI to BIL_CI with the majority of those occurring in patients younger than 65 years of age. Conversely, the majority of participants who achieved a significant improvement in BKB-SIN were adults >65 years of age. Years of BIL_CI experience and time between implants were not associated with performance. For localization, mean absolute error increased with age for low and high narrowband noise, but not for the broadband noise. Response gain was negatively correlated with age for all localization stimuli. Neither BIL_CI listening experience nor time between implants significantly impacted localization ability. Subjectively, participants report reduction in disability with the addition of the second CI. There is no observed relationship between age or speech recognition score and satisfaction with BIL_CI. Conclusion: Overall performance on binaural listening tasks was poorer in older adults than in younger adults. However, older adults were able to achieve significant benefit from the addition of a second CI, and performance on binaural tasks was not correlated with overall device satisfaction. The significance of the improvement was task and stimulus dependent but suggested a critical limit may exist for optimal performance on SIN tasks for CI users. Specifically, older adults require at least a +8 dB SNR to understand 50% of speech postoperatively; therefore, solely utilizing a fixed +5 dB SNR preoperatively to qualify CI candidates is not recommended as this test condition may introduce limitations in demonstrating CI benefit.
双侧人工耳蜗植入对青年和老年人双耳听力任务的影响
目的:本研究探讨了第二人工耳蜗(CI)对年轻人和老年人双耳噪声和定位语音理解任务的客观和主观益处。我们的目的是确定老年人群是否可以利用双耳信号,并与年轻人群相比,从双耳CI (BIL_CI)中获得可比的益处。方法:29例成人重度至重度双侧感音神经性听力损失。在噪声测试中,对参与者进行两种情况下的评价,即单独使用更好的CI (BE_CI)和使用AzBio和bamford - kowalbench (BKB)句子的BIL_CI。在BIL_CI条件下,使用宽带刺激、低频刺激和高频刺激完成定位任务。采用主观问卷来评估CI的满意度。结果:年龄越大,AzBio +5 dB信噪比(SNR)和BKB-speech in noise (SIN)表现越差;然而,在所有年龄段都观察到从BE_CI到BIL_CI的改善。在AzBio +5条件下,近一半的参与者实现了从BE_CI到BIL_CI的显着改善,其中大多数发生在年龄小于65岁的患者中。相反,大多数获得BKB-SIN显著改善的参与者是>65岁的成年人。BIL_CI经验的年数和植入之间的时间与表现无关。对于定位,低窄带噪声和高窄带噪声的平均绝对误差随年龄增大,而宽带噪声的平均绝对误差不随年龄增大。所有局部刺激的反应增益与年龄呈负相关。BIL_CI聆听经验和植体间隔时间对定位能力均无显著影响。主观上,参与者报告减少残疾与第二个CI的增加。年龄和语音识别评分与BIL_CI满意度之间没有关系。结论:老年人在双耳听力任务中的总体表现比年轻人差。然而,老年人能够从增加第二个CI中获得显著的好处,并且双耳任务的表现与总体设备满意度无关。这种改善的意义与任务和刺激有关,但表明CI用户在SIN任务上的最佳表现可能存在一个临界限制。具体来说,老年人术后至少需要+ 8db信噪比才能理解50%的言语;因此,不建议术前仅使用固定的+5 dB信噪比来确定CI候选者的资格,因为这种测试条件可能会限制CI益处的展示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信