The Impact of Pore Structure on Carbonate Stimulation Treatment Using VES-Based HCl

Tiurma Theresa Sibarani, M. Ziauddin, H. Nasr-El-Din, Ahmed S. Zakaria
{"title":"The Impact of Pore Structure on Carbonate Stimulation Treatment Using VES-Based HCl","authors":"Tiurma Theresa Sibarani, M. Ziauddin, H. Nasr-El-Din, Ahmed S. Zakaria","doi":"10.2118/192066-MS","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n This study investigates the performance of viscoelastic surfactant (VES)-based HCl stimulation fluids as a function of carbonate rock type and quantifies the response of the acid to different pore-structures. A pore-structure evaluation during stimulation design could lead to a successful field treatment.\n Coreflood tests were conducted using several types of limestone cores with permeabilities ranging from 2.5 to 155 md. Intergranular pores were dominant in the Indiana limestone and Austin chalk samples investigated, whereas moldic pores were dominant in the Pink desert, Edwards yellow, Winterset, and Edwards white cores. Tracer experiments characterized the pore structure in each carbonate sample, and the tracer fluid was injected at 5 cm3/min and 75°F into the cores with dimensions of 6 in. length and 1.5 in. diameter. The tracer effluent data was used to measure accessible porosity (flowing fraction) for each core sample. After the tracer, the VES acid was injected at rates from 1 to 10 cm3/min and 150°F to determine pore volume to breakthrough (PVbt). The wormhole patterns were analyzed using computed tomography (CT) scan images, and the pattern complexity was examined by fractal dimension analysis.\n A better pore connectivity showed for Indiana limestone compared to Edwards yellow, Winterset limestone, and Edwards white. The flowing fractions were 1, 0.86, 0.61, and 0.53 for Indiana limestone, Edwards yellow, Winterset limestone, and Edwards white, respectively. The PVbt of Indiana limestone ranged from 0.62 to 0.92. Cores with lower pore connectivity, such as Edwards yellow, had PVbt ranging from 0.52 to 0.81, Winterset limestone from 0.34 to 0.49, and Edwards white from 0.21 to 0.36. These results revealed that higher flowing fractions are required with a higher PVbt. Rocks that have the same dominant pore-structures usually exhibit similar wormhole behavior.\n Prior to this study, the performance of VES fluids had only been studied on carbonate rocks with well-connected intergranular porosity. The results of this study show that porosity distribution of the rock affects the response to acids.","PeriodicalId":11182,"journal":{"name":"Day 3 Thu, October 25, 2018","volume":"39 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-10-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 3 Thu, October 25, 2018","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/192066-MS","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

This study investigates the performance of viscoelastic surfactant (VES)-based HCl stimulation fluids as a function of carbonate rock type and quantifies the response of the acid to different pore-structures. A pore-structure evaluation during stimulation design could lead to a successful field treatment. Coreflood tests were conducted using several types of limestone cores with permeabilities ranging from 2.5 to 155 md. Intergranular pores were dominant in the Indiana limestone and Austin chalk samples investigated, whereas moldic pores were dominant in the Pink desert, Edwards yellow, Winterset, and Edwards white cores. Tracer experiments characterized the pore structure in each carbonate sample, and the tracer fluid was injected at 5 cm3/min and 75°F into the cores with dimensions of 6 in. length and 1.5 in. diameter. The tracer effluent data was used to measure accessible porosity (flowing fraction) for each core sample. After the tracer, the VES acid was injected at rates from 1 to 10 cm3/min and 150°F to determine pore volume to breakthrough (PVbt). The wormhole patterns were analyzed using computed tomography (CT) scan images, and the pattern complexity was examined by fractal dimension analysis. A better pore connectivity showed for Indiana limestone compared to Edwards yellow, Winterset limestone, and Edwards white. The flowing fractions were 1, 0.86, 0.61, and 0.53 for Indiana limestone, Edwards yellow, Winterset limestone, and Edwards white, respectively. The PVbt of Indiana limestone ranged from 0.62 to 0.92. Cores with lower pore connectivity, such as Edwards yellow, had PVbt ranging from 0.52 to 0.81, Winterset limestone from 0.34 to 0.49, and Edwards white from 0.21 to 0.36. These results revealed that higher flowing fractions are required with a higher PVbt. Rocks that have the same dominant pore-structures usually exhibit similar wormhole behavior. Prior to this study, the performance of VES fluids had only been studied on carbonate rocks with well-connected intergranular porosity. The results of this study show that porosity distribution of the rock affects the response to acids.
孔隙结构对ves基HCl碳酸盐岩增产处理的影响
本研究考察了基于粘弹性表面活性剂(VES)的HCl增产液的性能与碳酸盐岩类型的关系,并量化了酸对不同孔隙结构的响应。在增产设计过程中进行孔隙结构评估可以成功进行现场处理。研究人员利用渗透率在2.5 ~ 155 md之间的几种石灰岩岩心进行了岩心驱油测试。在印第安纳石灰岩和奥斯汀白垩样品中,晶间孔隙占主导地位,而在粉红沙漠、爱德华兹黄岩心、温特塞特岩心和爱德华兹白岩心中,模态孔隙占主导地位。示踪剂实验表征了每个碳酸盐样品的孔隙结构,示踪液以5 cm3/min和75°F的速度注入到尺寸为6 in的岩心中。长度和1.5英寸。直径。示踪剂流出数据用于测量每个岩心样品的可接近孔隙度(流动分数)。示踪剂后,以1 ~ 10 cm3/min和150°F的速度注入VES酸,以测定孔隙体积(PVbt)。利用计算机断层扫描(CT)图像分析虫洞图案,用分形维数分析虫洞图案的复杂度。与Edwards黄灰岩、Winterset灰岩和Edwards白灰岩相比,Indiana灰岩的孔隙连通性更好。印第安纳灰岩、爱德华兹黄灰岩、温特赛特灰岩和爱德华兹白灰岩的流动分数分别为1、0.86、0.61和0.53。印第安纳石灰岩的PVbt值在0.62 ~ 0.92之间。孔隙连通性较低的岩心,如Edwards黄岩心,PVbt值为0.52 ~ 0.81,Winterset灰岩为0.34 ~ 0.49,Edwards白岩心为0.21 ~ 0.36。这些结果表明,更高的PVbt要求更高的流动分数。具有相同主导孔隙结构的岩石通常表现出相似的虫洞行为。在此之前,研究人员只对具有良好连通粒间孔隙度的碳酸盐岩进行了研究。研究结果表明,岩石孔隙度分布影响岩石对酸的响应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信