Artificial intelligence assisted discrimination between pulmonary tuberculous nodules and solid lung cancer nodules

Shihan Zeng , Junhao Mu , Haiyun Dai , Mingyu Peng, Weiyi Li, Min Ao, Jing Huang, Li Yang
{"title":"Artificial intelligence assisted discrimination between pulmonary tuberculous nodules and solid lung cancer nodules","authors":"Shihan Zeng ,&nbsp;Junhao Mu ,&nbsp;Haiyun Dai ,&nbsp;Mingyu Peng,&nbsp;Weiyi Li,&nbsp;Min Ao,&nbsp;Jing Huang,&nbsp;Li Yang","doi":"10.1016/j.ceh.2022.12.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The differential diagnosis between pulmonary tuberculous nodules and solid lung cancer nodules is difficult and easy to be misdiagnosed in clinic. The data of clinic and image features of Chest CT with 70 cases of non-calcified pulmonary tuberculous nodules and 198 cases of solid lung cancer nodules confirmed by pathology in the Department of Thoracic Surgery or Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, the First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University from January to September 2020 were collected retrospectively. The characteristics of clinical and chest CT were compared between pulmonary tuberculous nodules and solid lung cancer nodules. The sensitivity, specificity, accuracy and negative predictive value in the two groups were compared between Artificial Intelligence assisted diagnosis system and manual image reading. The results found that the mean age, past tumor history, family history of tumor, CT image features of nodules includes mean diameter, short burr, blood vessel crossing in the pulmonary tuberculous nodules group were lower than those in the solid lung cancer group (p &lt; 0.05). In 35 cases of pulmonary tuberculous nodules group and 63 cases of solid lung cancer nodules group with Dicom format thin-slice chest CT, the sensitivity of AI-assisted diagnosis was 98.98 %. The diagnosis specificity, accuracy and negative predictive value in the AI group (80.61 %, 92.06 %, 60.00 %) were much higher than these in the intermediate respiratory physicians (62.24 %, 76.19 %, 37.14 %, p = 0.004, 0.015, 0.044) respectively, and there was no significant difference between AI and senior radiologists. There are many similarities in clinical and CT image features between pulmonary tuberculous nodules and solid lung cancer nodules. The ability of AI-assisted diagnosis system is better than that of intermediate physicians, reaching the diagnostic level of senior physicians, which is conducive to homogenization and improvement of the differential diagnosis ability of physicians.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100268,"journal":{"name":"Clinical eHealth","volume":"5 ","pages":"Pages 100-105"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2588914122000259/pdfft?md5=c6f5c68a0e16cefde93f2811cd911b66&pid=1-s2.0-S2588914122000259-main.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical eHealth","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2588914122000259","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The differential diagnosis between pulmonary tuberculous nodules and solid lung cancer nodules is difficult and easy to be misdiagnosed in clinic. The data of clinic and image features of Chest CT with 70 cases of non-calcified pulmonary tuberculous nodules and 198 cases of solid lung cancer nodules confirmed by pathology in the Department of Thoracic Surgery or Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, the First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University from January to September 2020 were collected retrospectively. The characteristics of clinical and chest CT were compared between pulmonary tuberculous nodules and solid lung cancer nodules. The sensitivity, specificity, accuracy and negative predictive value in the two groups were compared between Artificial Intelligence assisted diagnosis system and manual image reading. The results found that the mean age, past tumor history, family history of tumor, CT image features of nodules includes mean diameter, short burr, blood vessel crossing in the pulmonary tuberculous nodules group were lower than those in the solid lung cancer group (p < 0.05). In 35 cases of pulmonary tuberculous nodules group and 63 cases of solid lung cancer nodules group with Dicom format thin-slice chest CT, the sensitivity of AI-assisted diagnosis was 98.98 %. The diagnosis specificity, accuracy and negative predictive value in the AI group (80.61 %, 92.06 %, 60.00 %) were much higher than these in the intermediate respiratory physicians (62.24 %, 76.19 %, 37.14 %, p = 0.004, 0.015, 0.044) respectively, and there was no significant difference between AI and senior radiologists. There are many similarities in clinical and CT image features between pulmonary tuberculous nodules and solid lung cancer nodules. The ability of AI-assisted diagnosis system is better than that of intermediate physicians, reaching the diagnostic level of senior physicians, which is conducive to homogenization and improvement of the differential diagnosis ability of physicians.

人工智能辅助鉴别肺结核结节与实性肺癌结节
肺结核结节与实性肺癌结节的鉴别诊断是临床诊断的难点,容易误诊。回顾性收集2020年1 - 9月重庆医科大学第一附属医院胸外科或呼吸与危重病医学科经病理证实的70例非钙化性肺结核结节和198例实性肺癌结节的胸部CT临床及影像资料。比较肺结核结节与实性肺癌结节的临床及胸部CT表现。比较人工智能辅助诊断系统与人工读图两组患者的敏感性、特异性、准确性及阴性预测值。结果发现,结核性结节组的平均年龄、既往肿瘤史、肿瘤家族史、结节的CT图像特征包括平均直径、短毛刺、血管交叉等均低于实性肺癌组(p <0.05)。在35例肺结核结节组和63例实性肺癌结节组的Dicom格式薄层胸部CT中,人工智能辅助诊断的敏感性为98.98%。AI组的诊断特异性、准确性和阴性预测值分别为80.61%、92.06%、60.00 %,显著高于中级呼吸内科医师(62.24%、76.19%、37.14%,p = 0.004、0.015、0.044),与高级放射科医师比较差异无统计学意义。肺结核结节与实性肺癌结节在临床和CT表现上有许多相似之处。人工智能辅助诊断系统的能力优于中级医师,达到高级医师的诊断水平,有利于医师鉴别诊断能力的同质化和提高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信