Investigating Optional Functional Element and Obligatory Contour Principle in L2 Comprehension and Production Among ESL Learners

IF 1 Q2 LINGUISTICS
De Castro, Gefilloyd Lim De Castro
{"title":"Investigating Optional Functional Element and Obligatory Contour Principle in L2 Comprehension and Production Among ESL Learners","authors":"De Castro, Gefilloyd Lim De Castro","doi":"10.22055/RALS.2021.16721","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Most studies in optional functional element (OFE), specifically the optional function word (OFW) such as the optional that and obligatory contour principle (OCP),are concerned with accounting facilitation in language production in L1. The present study accounted for comprehension facilitation of OFE and OCP in syntactically ambiguous clausal complement, and OCP in L2 production among 180 ESL speakers. Utilizing quasi-experimental through the nonequivalent groups research design, the study found out differences in the interpretation of sentences with and without that. Adjacent identical elements (double thats) seemed to be avoided because they are perceived to be ungrammatical. Findings suggest that complementary clause (CC), with an embedded specific noun, is easily understood if optional that is included, whereas CC with an embedded common noun is easily understood without the said optional word. Findings are also pivotal in understanding comprehension-facilitation and production-facilitation accounts in L2 with respect to OFE and OCP.","PeriodicalId":44330,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Research in Applied Linguistics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Research in Applied Linguistics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22055/RALS.2021.16721","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Most studies in optional functional element (OFE), specifically the optional function word (OFW) such as the optional that and obligatory contour principle (OCP),are concerned with accounting facilitation in language production in L1. The present study accounted for comprehension facilitation of OFE and OCP in syntactically ambiguous clausal complement, and OCP in L2 production among 180 ESL speakers. Utilizing quasi-experimental through the nonequivalent groups research design, the study found out differences in the interpretation of sentences with and without that. Adjacent identical elements (double thats) seemed to be avoided because they are perceived to be ungrammatical. Findings suggest that complementary clause (CC), with an embedded specific noun, is easily understood if optional that is included, whereas CC with an embedded common noun is easily understood without the said optional word. Findings are also pivotal in understanding comprehension-facilitation and production-facilitation accounts in L2 with respect to OFE and OCP.
选择性功能要素与强制性轮廓原则在ESL学习者的二语理解与生产中的研究
大多数关于可选功能词(OFE)的研究,特别是可选功能词(OFW),如可选that和强制性轮廓原则(OCP),关注的是L1语言产生中的会计促进作用。本研究分析了180名ESL说话者在句法歧义小句补语中使用的汉语口语表达和汉语口语表达对理解的促进作用,以及汉语口语表达对二语生产的促进作用。本研究采用准实验的方法,通过非等效组研究设计,找出有和没有句子的解释差异。相邻的相同元素(double that)似乎被避免了,因为它们被认为是不符合语法的。研究结果表明,包含特定名词的补语从句在包含可选词的情况下更容易理解,而包含普通名词的补语从句在没有可选词的情况下更容易理解。研究结果对于理解第二语言中关于OFE和OCP的理解-促进和生产-促进解释也至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
50.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The growth of Applied Linguistics as a separate discipline is a success story of the 1950s. The field has developed in many parts of the world and is clearly destined to continue developing well into the twenty-first century. Being concerned with pragmatically motivated study of language in social and cultural settings, Applied Linguistics brings together work in a wide array of fields, including linguistics, literary studies, history, anthropology, psychology, sociology, and economics. The purpose of Journal of Research in Applied Linguistics is to contribute to the development of the field, reflect the breadth of work in Applied Linguistics, and enable readers to share in the exciting new developments that are taking place at the present time. Journal of Research in Applied Linguistics (RALs) invites all Iranian and foreign linguists, applied linguists, and teaching practitioners to contribute to the journal by submitting papers under the following main headings: Applied Linguistics Literary Studies Translation Studies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信