Implementing and Analyzing Social Media in Higher Education

Jenny L. Davis, D'lane Compton, D. N. Farris, Tony P. Love
{"title":"Implementing and Analyzing Social Media in Higher Education","authors":"Jenny L. Davis, D'lane Compton, D. N. Farris, Tony P. Love","doi":"10.31235/osf.io/e5gcx","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"No longer can we think of \"online\" as somewhere people go, an escape our aside from daily living. Rather, the Internet, and digital technologies more generally, are part and parcel of everyday life. We move seamlessly, and often simultaneously, between digital and physical, acting and interacting with and without physical copresence. It is therefore important to understand how this kind of digital-physical enmeshment plays out in the educational setting, and how it can be harnessed for pedagogical purposes. Indeed, as Daniels and Feagin (2011) aptly state:A revolution in academia is coming. New social media and other web technologies are transforming the way we, as academics, do our job. These technologies offer communication that is interactive, instantaneous, global, low-cost, and fully searchable, as well as platforms for connecting with other scholars everywhere.In line with this, we examine the present role of digital technologies in higher education with an eye towards strengthening intellectual engagement.Specifically, we look at the successful incorporation of social network sites (boyd & Ellison, 2008) in the higher education setting through two case studies. The first case focuses on a student-generated Facebook group that emerged out of a 2011 Sociology of Gender course, and remains active several years later. The second looks at the successful maintenance of a Sociology Department Facebook page. The former demonstrates social media as a tool of pedagogy, while the latter demonstrates social media as a tool in the construction of a larger participatory learning culture (Jenkins et al., 2009). Beyond describing these case examples, we extract from them the components that made them useful for both faculty and students. Specifically, we show how optional participation, active content production, and active comment moderation can foster a rich learning environment and meaningful intellectual community.We illustrate these two cases through the autoethnographic accounts of authors Farris and Compton, who actively administer their respective course and departmental Facebook platforms. Through these personal accounts and our subsequent analysis of them, we address the specific issues of control, privacy, and participation. In so doing, we confront the challenges and opportunities of social network sites as educational tools. We offer both a practical model and concrete advice for the fruitful integration of social network sites within higher education, emphasizing balance between social connection and professionalism; information availability and information overload; administrator control and student driven engagement.Social Media in the ClassroomSocial media are the set of digital interactive tools used for production, consumption, and sharing of user generated content within a network. These include a range of platforms such as YouTube, Twitter, Tumblr, Facebook, Instagram, and Snapchat, for example. Social network sites are a subset of social media. These refer specifically to social media platforms on which existing networks connect through webs of personal homepages with the capacity for user-generated content produced by self and others (boyd, 2011; boyd & Ellison, 2008). Examples include Facebook, MySpace, and Google+. Our cases focus on social network sites, and the Facebook platform in particular.The use of social network sites is highly prevalent and growing. The Pew Internet and American Life project reports that as of February 2014, 74% of all adults on the Internet utilize social network sites. This number jumps to 89% when looking at 18-29 year olds, encompassing those of typical college age. The jump in the statistics is unsurprising, as those of typical college age have been termed \"digital natives,\" in reference to their life-long engagement with digital technologies (Prensky, 2001). Indeed, Bowen (2012) identifies Facebook as the place students \"live\" and likens educational use of the platform to co-habitational learning communities-containing the advantages and disadvantages of intellectual and personal entwinement. …","PeriodicalId":90982,"journal":{"name":"The journal of faculty development","volume":"10 1","pages":"9-16"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The journal of faculty development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/e5gcx","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

No longer can we think of "online" as somewhere people go, an escape our aside from daily living. Rather, the Internet, and digital technologies more generally, are part and parcel of everyday life. We move seamlessly, and often simultaneously, between digital and physical, acting and interacting with and without physical copresence. It is therefore important to understand how this kind of digital-physical enmeshment plays out in the educational setting, and how it can be harnessed for pedagogical purposes. Indeed, as Daniels and Feagin (2011) aptly state:A revolution in academia is coming. New social media and other web technologies are transforming the way we, as academics, do our job. These technologies offer communication that is interactive, instantaneous, global, low-cost, and fully searchable, as well as platforms for connecting with other scholars everywhere.In line with this, we examine the present role of digital technologies in higher education with an eye towards strengthening intellectual engagement.Specifically, we look at the successful incorporation of social network sites (boyd & Ellison, 2008) in the higher education setting through two case studies. The first case focuses on a student-generated Facebook group that emerged out of a 2011 Sociology of Gender course, and remains active several years later. The second looks at the successful maintenance of a Sociology Department Facebook page. The former demonstrates social media as a tool of pedagogy, while the latter demonstrates social media as a tool in the construction of a larger participatory learning culture (Jenkins et al., 2009). Beyond describing these case examples, we extract from them the components that made them useful for both faculty and students. Specifically, we show how optional participation, active content production, and active comment moderation can foster a rich learning environment and meaningful intellectual community.We illustrate these two cases through the autoethnographic accounts of authors Farris and Compton, who actively administer their respective course and departmental Facebook platforms. Through these personal accounts and our subsequent analysis of them, we address the specific issues of control, privacy, and participation. In so doing, we confront the challenges and opportunities of social network sites as educational tools. We offer both a practical model and concrete advice for the fruitful integration of social network sites within higher education, emphasizing balance between social connection and professionalism; information availability and information overload; administrator control and student driven engagement.Social Media in the ClassroomSocial media are the set of digital interactive tools used for production, consumption, and sharing of user generated content within a network. These include a range of platforms such as YouTube, Twitter, Tumblr, Facebook, Instagram, and Snapchat, for example. Social network sites are a subset of social media. These refer specifically to social media platforms on which existing networks connect through webs of personal homepages with the capacity for user-generated content produced by self and others (boyd, 2011; boyd & Ellison, 2008). Examples include Facebook, MySpace, and Google+. Our cases focus on social network sites, and the Facebook platform in particular.The use of social network sites is highly prevalent and growing. The Pew Internet and American Life project reports that as of February 2014, 74% of all adults on the Internet utilize social network sites. This number jumps to 89% when looking at 18-29 year olds, encompassing those of typical college age. The jump in the statistics is unsurprising, as those of typical college age have been termed "digital natives," in reference to their life-long engagement with digital technologies (Prensky, 2001). Indeed, Bowen (2012) identifies Facebook as the place students "live" and likens educational use of the platform to co-habitational learning communities-containing the advantages and disadvantages of intellectual and personal entwinement. …
社会媒体在高等教育中的实施与分析
我们不再认为“网络”是人们去的地方,是我们逃离日常生活的地方。相反,互联网和更广泛的数字技术是日常生活中不可或缺的一部分。我们在数字和实体之间无缝移动,而且经常是同时移动,在有或没有实体存在的情况下行动和互动。因此,了解这种数字与物理的结合如何在教育环境中发挥作用,以及如何利用它来达到教学目的是很重要的。事实上,正如丹尼尔斯和费金(2011)所言:学术界的一场革命即将到来。新的社交媒体和其他网络技术正在改变我们作为学者的工作方式。这些技术提供了互动、即时、全球、低成本和完全可搜索的交流,以及与世界各地其他学者联系的平台。与此相一致,我们着眼于加强智力参与,研究数字技术在高等教育中的作用。具体来说,我们通过两个案例研究来研究社交网站在高等教育环境中的成功整合(boyd & Ellison, 2008)。第一个案例关注的是2011年性别社会学课程中出现的一个由学生创建的Facebook小组,该小组在几年后仍然活跃。第二篇文章着眼于社会学系Facebook页面的成功维护。前者证明了社交媒体是一种教学工具,而后者则证明了社交媒体是构建更大的参与式学习文化的工具(Jenkins et al., 2009)。除了描述这些案例之外,我们还从中提取了使它们对教师和学生都有用的组件。具体来说,我们展示了可选择的参与、积极的内容生产和积极的评论审核如何促进丰富的学习环境和有意义的知识社区。我们通过作者法里斯和康普顿的自我民族志描述来说明这两个案例,他们积极管理各自的课程和部门Facebook平台。通过这些个人账户以及我们随后对其进行的分析,我们解决了控制、隐私和参与等具体问题。在这样做的过程中,我们面对了社交网站作为教育工具的挑战和机遇。我们为高等教育社会网站的有效整合提供了一个实用的模式和具体的建议,强调社会联系和专业之间的平衡;信息可用性与信息过载;管理员控制和学生驱动的参与。课堂上的社交媒体社交媒体是一组数字互动工具,用于在网络中生产、消费和分享用户生成的内容。这些平台包括YouTube、Twitter、Tumblr、Facebook、Instagram和Snapchat等一系列平台。社交网站是社交媒体的一个子集。这些具体指的是社交媒体平台,在这些平台上,现有网络通过个人主页的网络连接起来,具有由自己和他人生产的用户生成内容的能力(boyd, 2011;boyd & Ellison, 2008)。例如Facebook、MySpace和b谷歌+。我们的案例主要针对社交网站,尤其是Facebook平台。社交网站的使用非常普遍,而且还在不断增长。皮尤互联网和美国生活项目报告称,截至2014年2月,互联网上74%的成年人使用社交网站。在18-29岁的人群中,这一数字跃升至89%,包括那些典型的大学年龄。统计数据的激增并不令人惊讶,因为那些典型的大学年龄的人被称为“数字原住民”,指的是他们一生都在使用数字技术(Prensky, 2001)。事实上,Bowen(2012)将Facebook视为学生“生活”的地方,并将该平台的教育用途比作共同居住的学习社区——包含智力和个人纠缠的优点和缺点。…
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信