{"title":"¿Son fiables los medidores de glucemia capilar?","authors":"Maria Luisa Casas Oñate, Dolores Montoya Martínez","doi":"10.1016/j.avdiab.2012.09.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To assess the reliability of the portable blood glucose meters most used in a Health Area.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A diagnostic test analysis was conducted in the Zone VIII Health Centre, Albacete Health Area. A total of 50 diabetic patients with different treatments, and who came to the Centre to perform an analytical control, were included in the study. Capillary blood samples were measured on the seven glucometers to study. The results were compared with venous blood tested in the reference laboratory of the Albacete General University Hospital. For the descriptive analysis, means and percentages were used, and the Student's t test for paired data and standard deviation for analytical comparisons of the means, with 95% confidence intervals and <em>P</em> <!--><<!--> <!-->.05.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Of the 50 subjects who were included in the study, 48% were female, and the mean age was 59 years. The glucose readings ranged from 23<!--> <!-->mg/dL to 292<!--> <!-->mg/dL and with haematocrits between 36.4% and 53.8%. The mean differences between the results from the reference laboratory and the different glucometers were as follows: Contour Link<sup>®</sup> 6.30; Accu-Chek<sup>®</sup> Aviva 10.20; Glucocard<sup>®</sup> 10.32; Optium Xceed<sup>®</sup> 12.24; FreeStyle Freedom<sup>®</sup> 13.62; One Touch Ultra 2<sup>®</sup> 18.16; Breeze 2<sup>®</sup> –8.08.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Glucometers generally give reasonable results compared to those measured in venous blood, and are highly reliable for the self-monitoring diabetic patient.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100152,"journal":{"name":"Avances en Diabetología","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.avdiab.2012.09.003","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Avances en Diabetología","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1134323012001172","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6
Abstract
Objective
To assess the reliability of the portable blood glucose meters most used in a Health Area.
Methods
A diagnostic test analysis was conducted in the Zone VIII Health Centre, Albacete Health Area. A total of 50 diabetic patients with different treatments, and who came to the Centre to perform an analytical control, were included in the study. Capillary blood samples were measured on the seven glucometers to study. The results were compared with venous blood tested in the reference laboratory of the Albacete General University Hospital. For the descriptive analysis, means and percentages were used, and the Student's t test for paired data and standard deviation for analytical comparisons of the means, with 95% confidence intervals and P < .05.
Results
Of the 50 subjects who were included in the study, 48% were female, and the mean age was 59 years. The glucose readings ranged from 23 mg/dL to 292 mg/dL and with haematocrits between 36.4% and 53.8%. The mean differences between the results from the reference laboratory and the different glucometers were as follows: Contour Link® 6.30; Accu-Chek® Aviva 10.20; Glucocard® 10.32; Optium Xceed® 12.24; FreeStyle Freedom® 13.62; One Touch Ultra 2® 18.16; Breeze 2® –8.08.
Conclusions
Glucometers generally give reasonable results compared to those measured in venous blood, and are highly reliable for the self-monitoring diabetic patient.