¿Son fiables los medidores de glucemia capilar?

Maria Luisa Casas Oñate, Dolores Montoya Martínez
{"title":"¿Son fiables los medidores de glucemia capilar?","authors":"Maria Luisa Casas Oñate,&nbsp;Dolores Montoya Martínez","doi":"10.1016/j.avdiab.2012.09.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To assess the reliability of the portable blood glucose meters most used in a Health Area.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A diagnostic test analysis was conducted in the Zone VIII Health Centre, Albacete Health Area. A total of 50 diabetic patients with different treatments, and who came to the Centre to perform an analytical control, were included in the study. Capillary blood samples were measured on the seven glucometers to study. The results were compared with venous blood tested in the reference laboratory of the Albacete General University Hospital. For the descriptive analysis, means and percentages were used, and the Student's t test for paired data and standard deviation for analytical comparisons of the means, with 95% confidence intervals and <em>P</em> <!-->&lt;<!--> <!-->.05.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Of the 50 subjects who were included in the study, 48% were female, and the mean age was 59 years. The glucose readings ranged from 23<!--> <!-->mg/dL to 292<!--> <!-->mg/dL and with haematocrits between 36.4% and 53.8%. The mean differences between the results from the reference laboratory and the different glucometers were as follows: Contour Link<sup>®</sup> 6.30; Accu-Chek<sup>®</sup> Aviva 10.20; Glucocard<sup>®</sup> 10.32; Optium Xceed<sup>®</sup> 12.24; FreeStyle Freedom<sup>®</sup> 13.62; One Touch Ultra 2<sup>®</sup> 18.16; Breeze 2<sup>®</sup> –8.08.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Glucometers generally give reasonable results compared to those measured in venous blood, and are highly reliable for the self-monitoring diabetic patient.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100152,"journal":{"name":"Avances en Diabetología","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.avdiab.2012.09.003","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Avances en Diabetología","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1134323012001172","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Objective

To assess the reliability of the portable blood glucose meters most used in a Health Area.

Methods

A diagnostic test analysis was conducted in the Zone VIII Health Centre, Albacete Health Area. A total of 50 diabetic patients with different treatments, and who came to the Centre to perform an analytical control, were included in the study. Capillary blood samples were measured on the seven glucometers to study. The results were compared with venous blood tested in the reference laboratory of the Albacete General University Hospital. For the descriptive analysis, means and percentages were used, and the Student's t test for paired data and standard deviation for analytical comparisons of the means, with 95% confidence intervals and P < .05.

Results

Of the 50 subjects who were included in the study, 48% were female, and the mean age was 59 years. The glucose readings ranged from 23 mg/dL to 292 mg/dL and with haematocrits between 36.4% and 53.8%. The mean differences between the results from the reference laboratory and the different glucometers were as follows: Contour Link® 6.30; Accu-Chek® Aviva 10.20; Glucocard® 10.32; Optium Xceed® 12.24; FreeStyle Freedom® 13.62; One Touch Ultra 2® 18.16; Breeze 2® –8.08.

Conclusions

Glucometers generally give reasonable results compared to those measured in venous blood, and are highly reliable for the self-monitoring diabetic patient.

毛细血管血糖仪可靠吗?
目的评价某卫生区常用便携式血糖仪的可靠性。方法对阿尔巴塞特卫生区八区卫生中心进行诊断试验分析。共有50名接受不同治疗的糖尿病患者被纳入研究,这些患者来到中心进行分析对照。在7台血糖仪上测量毛细血管血液样本进行研究。结果与在阿尔巴塞特综合大学医院参比实验室检测的静脉血进行比较。描述性分析使用均值和百分比,配对数据使用Student's t检验,均值分析比较使用标准差,95%置信区间和P <. 05。结果纳入研究的50名受试者中,女性占48%,平均年龄59岁。葡萄糖读数在23毫克/分升到292毫克/分升之间,红细胞比容在36.4%到53.8%之间。参考实验室的结果与不同血糖仪的平均差异如下:Contour Link®6.30;Accu-Chek®Aviva 10.20;Glucocard®10.32;Optium Xceed®12.24;自由式自由®13.62;One Touch Ultra 2®18.16;微风2®-8.08。结论与静脉血相比,血糖仪的测量结果普遍合理,对糖尿病患者的自我监测具有较高的可靠性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信