Controllability of Technosphere and Paradigm of Global Evolutionism

IF 0.4 0 PHILOSOPHY
N. Popkova
{"title":"Controllability of Technosphere and Paradigm of Global Evolutionism","authors":"N. Popkova","doi":"10.29202/phil-cosm/21/3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article analyzes the modern philosophical view of technique as the next step in the selfdevelopment of the universe, and shows its relevance for the analysis of problem of the controllability of technosphere. The applicability of various philosophical approaches to the analysis of technique for examining contemporary global problems is considered. Philosophy of technique, analyzing technogenic processes in nature and in society, offers various philosophical approaches, on the basis of which programs are developed to overcome the current civilizational crisis. It is shown that there are different views on its nature: the theoretical models obtained and the practical recommendations depend on the understanding of the technique. The traditional view of technique as a passive tool is not effective enough as a basis for philosophical analysis. An alternative concept is disclosed that understands technical progress as a stage of global evolution; its advantages and disadvantages are analyzed. Developed by modern science, the concept of global evolutionism allows us to see the similarity between the processes of nature change, characteristic for living matter and for technical reality. If we consider, as an evolutionary criterion, the scale of processing information or the ability to adapt, then technique stands at a higher stage of development than biological life. The self-organization of the global technical system has not yet been achieved and the formation of the artificial intelligence controlling it has not been completed, but humanity is actively working in this direction, confident that the emerging technosphere is just a tool for improving its well-being. The development of the evolutionary approach to technique leads to the conclusion that the problems of modern humanity are signs of the beginning of his involution, caused by the transition of evolutionary leadership to technical reality. The technique is already emerging from the power of man: perhaps attempts to preserve the former person or nature are opposed to the vector of evolution leading them to become elements of the technosphere. Although this approach does not take into account a number of modern concepts (sustainable development, controlled evolution, etc.), evolutionary approach to technique requires further analysis and development of a methodology for its verification and the derivation of possible recommendations for environmental performance. It is concluded that further philosophical search is necessary, since different views on technique serve as a basis for opposing programs to exit from the current environmental crisis. Change of ideas about the essence of technique leads to new, unexpected prognosis of the development of technogenic society and helps to take a fresh look at the prospects of achievement of the controllability of technosphere.","PeriodicalId":42240,"journal":{"name":"Philosophy and Cosmology-Filosofiya i Kosmologiya","volume":"58 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2018-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Philosophy and Cosmology-Filosofiya i Kosmologiya","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29202/phil-cosm/21/3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

The article analyzes the modern philosophical view of technique as the next step in the selfdevelopment of the universe, and shows its relevance for the analysis of problem of the controllability of technosphere. The applicability of various philosophical approaches to the analysis of technique for examining contemporary global problems is considered. Philosophy of technique, analyzing technogenic processes in nature and in society, offers various philosophical approaches, on the basis of which programs are developed to overcome the current civilizational crisis. It is shown that there are different views on its nature: the theoretical models obtained and the practical recommendations depend on the understanding of the technique. The traditional view of technique as a passive tool is not effective enough as a basis for philosophical analysis. An alternative concept is disclosed that understands technical progress as a stage of global evolution; its advantages and disadvantages are analyzed. Developed by modern science, the concept of global evolutionism allows us to see the similarity between the processes of nature change, characteristic for living matter and for technical reality. If we consider, as an evolutionary criterion, the scale of processing information or the ability to adapt, then technique stands at a higher stage of development than biological life. The self-organization of the global technical system has not yet been achieved and the formation of the artificial intelligence controlling it has not been completed, but humanity is actively working in this direction, confident that the emerging technosphere is just a tool for improving its well-being. The development of the evolutionary approach to technique leads to the conclusion that the problems of modern humanity are signs of the beginning of his involution, caused by the transition of evolutionary leadership to technical reality. The technique is already emerging from the power of man: perhaps attempts to preserve the former person or nature are opposed to the vector of evolution leading them to become elements of the technosphere. Although this approach does not take into account a number of modern concepts (sustainable development, controlled evolution, etc.), evolutionary approach to technique requires further analysis and development of a methodology for its verification and the derivation of possible recommendations for environmental performance. It is concluded that further philosophical search is necessary, since different views on technique serve as a basis for opposing programs to exit from the current environmental crisis. Change of ideas about the essence of technique leads to new, unexpected prognosis of the development of technogenic society and helps to take a fresh look at the prospects of achievement of the controllability of technosphere.
技术圈的可控性与全球进化论范式
本文分析了现代哲学的技术观是宇宙自我发展的下一步,并指出了它对技术圈可控性问题分析的相关性。各种哲学方法的适用性,以分析技术检查当代全球问题被认为。技术哲学,分析自然和社会中的技术过程,提供了各种哲学方法,在此基础上制定了克服当前文明危机的方案。结果表明,对其性质有不同的看法:所获得的理论模型和实际建议取决于对该技术的理解。将技术视为被动工具的传统观点不足以作为哲学分析的基础。公开了另一种概念,将技术进步理解为全球演变的一个阶段;分析了其优缺点。在现代科学的发展下,全球进化论的概念让我们看到了自然变化过程之间的相似性,生命物质的特征和技术现实。如果我们把处理信息的规模或适应能力作为一种进化标准来考虑,那么技术就处于比生物生命更高的发展阶段。全球技术体系的自组织尚未实现,控制它的人工智能的形成尚未完成,但人类正在积极地朝着这个方向努力,相信新兴的技术圈只是改善人类福祉的工具。技术进化方法的发展导致了这样的结论:现代人类的问题是人类进化的开始的标志,这是由进化领导向技术现实的过渡引起的。这项技术已经从人类的力量中出现了:也许试图保护以前的人或自然是与导致他们成为技术圈元素的进化向量相反的。虽然这种方法没有考虑到一些现代概念(可持续发展、有控制的演变等),但技术的演变方法需要进一步分析和发展一种方法,以便核查和提出可能的环境绩效建议。结论是,进一步的哲学探索是必要的,因为对技术的不同看法是反对退出当前环境危机的方案的基础。对技术本质观念的改变,导致了对技术社会发展的新的、意想不到的预测,有助于重新审视技术圈可控性的实现前景。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
25.00%
发文量
27
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信