Why are Faculty Unfavorably Disposed to MOOCs? — A Sharing of Views by Chinese Hospitality Educators

IF 2.5 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Xin Zhang, M. Koseoglu, B. King, O. Aladag
{"title":"Why are Faculty Unfavorably Disposed to MOOCs? — A Sharing of Views by Chinese Hospitality Educators","authors":"Xin Zhang, M. Koseoglu, B. King, O. Aladag","doi":"10.1080/10963758.2021.1963749","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This study explores the negative disposition of many hospitality higher education faculty toward MOOCs, an increasingly prominent delivery mode in pedagogical discourse which potentially enriches student learning. Such enrichment is particularly welcome in the case of hospitality because of its diverse stakeholders and student learning needs. The researchers conducted an in-depth and qualitative exploration with faculty members in mainland China. They combined the Diffusion of Innovation (DOI) approach and theory of motivation to propose five dimensions that account for groupings of resistance to deploying MOOCs. These are attributes and complexities, perceived incompatibility, unsuitability for trial, and lack of observational capacity. The study contributes to knowledge by examining the perspectives of faculty who have the capacity to constrain the deployment of MOOCs. The authors suggest that faculty members should be encouraged to embrace MOOCs as an innovative medium for learning and teaching.","PeriodicalId":46390,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Education","volume":"41 4 1","pages":"123 - 132"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10963758.2021.1963749","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT This study explores the negative disposition of many hospitality higher education faculty toward MOOCs, an increasingly prominent delivery mode in pedagogical discourse which potentially enriches student learning. Such enrichment is particularly welcome in the case of hospitality because of its diverse stakeholders and student learning needs. The researchers conducted an in-depth and qualitative exploration with faculty members in mainland China. They combined the Diffusion of Innovation (DOI) approach and theory of motivation to propose five dimensions that account for groupings of resistance to deploying MOOCs. These are attributes and complexities, perceived incompatibility, unsuitability for trial, and lack of observational capacity. The study contributes to knowledge by examining the perspectives of faculty who have the capacity to constrain the deployment of MOOCs. The authors suggest that faculty members should be encouraged to embrace MOOCs as an innovative medium for learning and teaching.
为什么教师不喜欢mooc ?-中国酒店教育工作者的意见交流
摘要:本研究探讨了许多酒店高等教育教师对mooc的负面倾向,mooc是一种在教学话语中日益突出的交付模式,它可能丰富学生的学习。这种丰富在酒店业尤其受欢迎,因为其利益攸关方和学生的学习需要各不相同。研究人员与中国大陆的教师进行了深入而定性的探讨。他们将创新扩散(DOI)方法和动机理论结合起来,提出了五个维度来解释部署mooc的阻力分组。这些是属性和复杂性,感知不相容,不适合试验,缺乏观察能力。该研究通过考察有能力限制mooc部署的教师的观点,为知识做出了贡献。作者建议,应该鼓励教师接受mooc,将其作为一种创新的学习和教学媒介。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Education
Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
17.20%
发文量
31
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信