Evaluation of a New Clinical Test of Fusion Status: A Pilot Study

{"title":"Evaluation of a New Clinical Test of Fusion Status: A Pilot Study","authors":"","doi":"10.31707/vdr2019.5.2.p113","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background\nSuppression is associated with binocular\nvision\nconditions such as amblyopia and strabismus.\nCommercial\nmethods of testing fusion often\nonly measure central fusion or suppression\nat near. The purpose of this pilot study was\nto assess a new iPad picture fusion test that\nassesses foveal and central fusion at near.\n\nMethods\nParticipants aged 5 years and older presenting\nfor eye examination at The Ohio State University\nCollege of Optometry were enrolled. Results\nfrom visual acuity, dry and wet refraction/retinoscopy, stereopsis and cover testing were\nrecorded from the patient chart. The iPad\npicture fusion test, Worth four-dot, Worth type\ntest with foveal letter targets, and Polarized\nfour-dot were performed by one examiner\nin a randomized order at 40 cm. Testing was\nrepeated with the anaglyphic filters reversed.\nCrosstabulation and McNemar chi-square\nanalysis were used to compare the results\nbetween fusion testing devices.\n\nResults\nOf the fifty participants (mean age = 17.5),\ntwelve reported suppression and one reported\ndiplopia. Testability was excellent for all tests\n(98% to 100%). There were no significant\ndifferences between tests in reported results\n(P ≥ 0.22 for all comparisons). No difference\nin reported fusion or suppression status was\nobserved with change in orientation of the\nanaglyphic filters. Six participants reported\nfoveal suppression alone at near which was\nnot identified with Worth four-dot at near.\n\nConclusion\nThe iPad picture fusion test provided excellent\ntestability and agreement with commonly\nused tests of fusion and allowed testing of\nboth central and foveal fusion at near. Nearly\nhalf (46%) of participants with suppression\nreported foveal suppression, supporting the\nimportance of testing for foveal suppression.","PeriodicalId":91423,"journal":{"name":"Vision development and rehabilitation","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vision development and rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31707/vdr2019.5.2.p113","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background Suppression is associated with binocular vision conditions such as amblyopia and strabismus. Commercial methods of testing fusion often only measure central fusion or suppression at near. The purpose of this pilot study was to assess a new iPad picture fusion test that assesses foveal and central fusion at near. Methods Participants aged 5 years and older presenting for eye examination at The Ohio State University College of Optometry were enrolled. Results from visual acuity, dry and wet refraction/retinoscopy, stereopsis and cover testing were recorded from the patient chart. The iPad picture fusion test, Worth four-dot, Worth type test with foveal letter targets, and Polarized four-dot were performed by one examiner in a randomized order at 40 cm. Testing was repeated with the anaglyphic filters reversed. Crosstabulation and McNemar chi-square analysis were used to compare the results between fusion testing devices. Results Of the fifty participants (mean age = 17.5), twelve reported suppression and one reported diplopia. Testability was excellent for all tests (98% to 100%). There were no significant differences between tests in reported results (P ≥ 0.22 for all comparisons). No difference in reported fusion or suppression status was observed with change in orientation of the anaglyphic filters. Six participants reported foveal suppression alone at near which was not identified with Worth four-dot at near. Conclusion The iPad picture fusion test provided excellent testability and agreement with commonly used tests of fusion and allowed testing of both central and foveal fusion at near. Nearly half (46%) of participants with suppression reported foveal suppression, supporting the importance of testing for foveal suppression.
评估融合状态的一种新的临床试验:一项初步研究
背景抑制与双眼视力状况有关,如弱视和斜视。商业的聚变测试方法通常只测量中心聚变或附近的抑制。本初步研究的目的是评估一种新的iPad图像融合测试,该测试可以评估近中心凹和中央融合。方法选取在俄亥俄州立大学验光学院进行眼科检查的5岁及以上受试者。从患者病历中记录视力、干湿屈光/视网膜检查、立体视和覆盖检查结果。iPadpicture融合测试,Worth四点测试,Worth类型测试与中央凹字母目标,偏振四点测试由一个检查者在40厘米随机顺序进行。重复测试时,颠倒了对焦滤光片。采用交叉标定和McNemar卡方分析比较融合试验装置之间的结果。结果50例参与者(平均年龄17.5岁)中,12例报告视力抑制,1例报告复视。所有测试的可测试性都很好(98%到100%)。各试验报告的结果无显著差异(所有比较P≥0.22)。在报道的融合或抑制状态中,未观察到随着色点取向的改变而变化的差异。6名参与者报告仅在附近有中央凹抑制,这与附近的Worth 4点不一致。结论iPad图像融合试验与常用的融合试验具有良好的可测性和一致性,可在近距离检测中央和中央凹融合。近一半(46%)的抑制参与者报告中央凹抑制,支持中央凹抑制测试的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信