Measuring Poverty and Socio-Economic Deprivation Inequalities in India at Sub-National Level

Q1 Arts and Humanities
Kajari Roy, S. K. Halder
{"title":"Measuring Poverty and Socio-Economic Deprivation Inequalities in India at Sub-National Level","authors":"Kajari Roy, S. K. Halder","doi":"10.3860/APSSR.V10I1.1581","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study examines the inequality of income, poverty and socio-economic variables manifesting human deprivation across the sixteen major states in India at different points of time. There exists a positive trend of inequality in income and poverty (measured in terms of head-count ratio-HCR) across the states at seven points of time, but there is a sharp increase in inequality in poverty after 1993-94. Since HCR captures only one dimension of poverty viz. income, we measure other non-income dimensions of human deprivations and their inequalities at three points of time: 1980-81, 1990-91 and 2000-2001. The results show a common positive trend of inequality implying increasing regional imbalance over the decades. Keeping in mind the problem of weights and aggregation in estimating Human Poverty Index (HPI) popularized by UNDP, a new multidimensional measure of poverty is suggested. This new measure of poverty is found compatible with the head-count ratio and human poverty index estimated by Planning Commission, India. Cluster Analysis has been applied in a similar context of human deprivation on the major states of India that provides us two distinct clusters in three points of time: 1980-81, 1990-91 and 2000-2001. The results show that Kerala has been a distinctive state in India in all the three points of time.","PeriodicalId":39323,"journal":{"name":"Asia-Pacific Social Science Review","volume":"6 1","pages":"1-1"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"15","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asia-Pacific Social Science Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3860/APSSR.V10I1.1581","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 15

Abstract

This study examines the inequality of income, poverty and socio-economic variables manifesting human deprivation across the sixteen major states in India at different points of time. There exists a positive trend of inequality in income and poverty (measured in terms of head-count ratio-HCR) across the states at seven points of time, but there is a sharp increase in inequality in poverty after 1993-94. Since HCR captures only one dimension of poverty viz. income, we measure other non-income dimensions of human deprivations and their inequalities at three points of time: 1980-81, 1990-91 and 2000-2001. The results show a common positive trend of inequality implying increasing regional imbalance over the decades. Keeping in mind the problem of weights and aggregation in estimating Human Poverty Index (HPI) popularized by UNDP, a new multidimensional measure of poverty is suggested. This new measure of poverty is found compatible with the head-count ratio and human poverty index estimated by Planning Commission, India. Cluster Analysis has been applied in a similar context of human deprivation on the major states of India that provides us two distinct clusters in three points of time: 1980-81, 1990-91 and 2000-2001. The results show that Kerala has been a distinctive state in India in all the three points of time.
衡量印度次国家层面的贫困和社会经济剥夺不平等
本研究考察了印度16个主要邦在不同时间点表现人类剥夺的收入、贫困和社会经济变量的不平等。在七个时间点上,各州的收入和贫困不平等(以人口总数比率衡量)存在积极的趋势,但1993-94年之后,贫困不平等急剧增加。由于HCR只捕获了贫困的一个维度,即收入,我们在三个时间点测量了人类剥夺的其他非收入维度及其不平等:1980-81年,1990-91年和2000-2001年。结果表明,在过去的几十年中,不平等的普遍趋势是积极的,这意味着区域不平衡的加剧。针对联合国开发计划署(UNDP)推广的人类贫困指数(HPI)估算中的权重和汇总问题,提出了一种新的多维贫困衡量标准。这一新的贫困衡量标准与印度计划委员会估计的人口总数比率和人类贫困指数相一致。聚类分析在类似的人类剥夺背景下应用于印度主要邦,为我们提供了三个时间点的两个不同的聚类:1980-81年,1990-91年和2000-2001年。结果表明,喀拉拉邦在这三个时间点上都是印度一个独特的邦。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Asia-Pacific Social Science Review
Asia-Pacific Social Science Review Arts and Humanities-History
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The Asia-Pacific Social Science Review (APSSR) is an internationally refereed journal published biannually (June and December) by De La Salle University, Manila, Philippines. It aims to be a leading venue for authors seeking to share their data and perspectives on compelling and emerging topics in the social sciences with, and to create an impact on, the region’s communities of academics, researchers, students, civil society, policymakers, development specialists, among others. Topics related to or with implications for the region that are pursued employing sound methodologies and comparative, and inter, multi and transdisciplinary approaches are of particular interest.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信