Comparative Study on Mechanical Behaviour of Enzyme Modified Soils

IF 1.3 Q3 ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL
V. Divya, M. Asha
{"title":"Comparative Study on Mechanical Behaviour of Enzyme Modified Soils","authors":"V. Divya, M. Asha","doi":"10.1680/jgrim.22.00029","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Soil stabilization of soil has been carried out by many researchers in the past using conventional materials such as lime, fly ash, silica fumes, quarry dust etc. Ground improvement using enzymes or micro-organisms, fermented from vegetable extracts, has been one of the latest sustainable invents in Geotechnical Engineering. The present work explores and compares the effectiveness of Terrazyme in improving the mechanical properties such as strength and compressibility characteristics of locally available soils. The experimental studies are extended to two soils which possess extreme characteristics namely lateritic and black cotton soils. The work is carried out on 3 different dosages of Terrazyme namely 150 ml/m3, 200 ml/m3 and 250 ml/m3 respectively, obtained through volumetric proportioning. In order to understand the long-term behaviour pattern of Terrazyme, studies are carried out on varying curing periods (7 and 28 days) and results are compared. The results highlight that Terrazyme modification is more effective in black cotton soil than lateritic soil. To evaluate the change in soil fabric brought about on account of enzyme application, scanning electron microscope (SEM) and energy dispersive X Ray analysis (EDAX) studies are performed on these soils. The design of flexible pavement with an enzyme modified subgrade revealed a more robust and sustainable infrastructure solution.","PeriodicalId":51705,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers-Ground Improvement","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers-Ground Improvement","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1680/jgrim.22.00029","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Soil stabilization of soil has been carried out by many researchers in the past using conventional materials such as lime, fly ash, silica fumes, quarry dust etc. Ground improvement using enzymes or micro-organisms, fermented from vegetable extracts, has been one of the latest sustainable invents in Geotechnical Engineering. The present work explores and compares the effectiveness of Terrazyme in improving the mechanical properties such as strength and compressibility characteristics of locally available soils. The experimental studies are extended to two soils which possess extreme characteristics namely lateritic and black cotton soils. The work is carried out on 3 different dosages of Terrazyme namely 150 ml/m3, 200 ml/m3 and 250 ml/m3 respectively, obtained through volumetric proportioning. In order to understand the long-term behaviour pattern of Terrazyme, studies are carried out on varying curing periods (7 and 28 days) and results are compared. The results highlight that Terrazyme modification is more effective in black cotton soil than lateritic soil. To evaluate the change in soil fabric brought about on account of enzyme application, scanning electron microscope (SEM) and energy dispersive X Ray analysis (EDAX) studies are performed on these soils. The design of flexible pavement with an enzyme modified subgrade revealed a more robust and sustainable infrastructure solution.
酶改性土力学性能的比较研究
过去,许多研究人员使用石灰、粉煤灰、二氧化硅烟尘、采石场粉尘等常规材料进行土壤稳定研究。利用植物提取物发酵的酶或微生物来改善土地,是岩土工程中最新的可持续发明之一。本研究探讨并比较了土拉酶在改善当地可用土壤的强度和压缩性等力学特性方面的有效性。将试验研究扩展到两种具有极端特性的土,即红土和黑棉土。通过体积配比得到三种不同剂量的Terrazyme,分别为150 ml/m3、200 ml/m3和250 ml/m3。为了了解Terrazyme的长期行为模式,对不同的养护期(7天和28天)进行了研究,并对结果进行了比较。结果表明,土霉酶对黑棉土的改性效果优于红土。为了评价施酶对土壤结构的影响,对这些土壤进行了扫描电镜(SEM)和能量色散X射线(EDAX)分析。柔性路面与酶改性路基的设计揭示了一个更强大和可持续的基础设施解决方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
8.30%
发文量
54
期刊介绍: Ground Improvement provides a fast-track vehicle for the dissemination of news in technological developments, feasibility studies and innovative engineering applications for all aspects of ground improvement, ground reinforcement and grouting. The journal publishes high-quality, practical papers relevant to engineers, specialist contractors and academics involved in the development, design, construction, monitoring and quality control aspects of ground improvement. It covers a wide range of civil and environmental engineering applications, including analytical advances, performance evaluations, pilot and model studies, instrumented case-histories and innovative applications of existing technology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信