Environmental Justice in an Era of Devolved Collaboration

IF 0.7 4区 社会学 Q4 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
Sheila Rose Foster
{"title":"Environmental Justice in an Era of Devolved Collaboration","authors":"Sheila Rose Foster","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.291510","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This Essay examines the move by environmental and natural resources agencies to devolve decision making influence to local, multi-stakeholder, collaborative groups. The emerging use of such decision making mechanisms - such as forestry and watershed partnerships and community advisory committees - reflects the need for more creative solutions to the current generation of environmental problems and for improved decision making processes for identifying and equitably distributing the costs and benefits of environmental decisions. In seeking more participatory, local and holistic decision making mechanisms, the move toward devolved collaboration intersects and converges with another prominent movement, environmental justice, in ways that are crucial for the future of environmental decision making. This Essay examines the points of convergence and divergence between these two important currents in modern environmental decision making. On the one hand, the interest-convergence of these two powerful currents in modern environmentalism has been a crucial element shaping the direction of environmentalism from the 1990s into the new century. There are now more voices than ever calling for the creation of democratic, sustainable communities and for a more comprehensive approach to environmental problems that address the connections between environmental, economic and civic health. Yet, despite the interest-convergence of these two powerful currents in modern environmentalism, there are dangers lurking at their intersection. This Essay argues that while devolved collaboration can theoretically ameliorate some regulatory inequities, it may also add renewed legitimacy to racial and class distributional inequities, further entrenching them in the landscape of environmental decision-making. Perhaps as importantly, devolved collaboration will introduce new equity problems in environmental decision-making by modifying current patterns of participation and representation in unforeseen ways. Like its predecessor decision making approaches, this evolving model, thus far, is indifferent to (or innocent about) the social structural and institutional conditions necessary to realize its own promises, including its aspiration of more equitable decisions. This Essay concludes that the movement toward devolved collaboration should best be regarded as the collective expression of a core set of normative principles that can guide the shaping of environmental decision making processes in a context-specific fashion. These normative principles can be used to tailor a mix of decision making mechanisms to specific environmental problems in particular ecological, social, economic, and political contexts. This contextualized approach brings with it the additional virtue of preserving the accountability of centralized authorities for ensuring fidelity to these principles in specific contexts instead of leaving this task to unaccountable, fragmented local groups.","PeriodicalId":45668,"journal":{"name":"Harvard Environmental Law Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2001-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"34","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Harvard Environmental Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.291510","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 34

Abstract

This Essay examines the move by environmental and natural resources agencies to devolve decision making influence to local, multi-stakeholder, collaborative groups. The emerging use of such decision making mechanisms - such as forestry and watershed partnerships and community advisory committees - reflects the need for more creative solutions to the current generation of environmental problems and for improved decision making processes for identifying and equitably distributing the costs and benefits of environmental decisions. In seeking more participatory, local and holistic decision making mechanisms, the move toward devolved collaboration intersects and converges with another prominent movement, environmental justice, in ways that are crucial for the future of environmental decision making. This Essay examines the points of convergence and divergence between these two important currents in modern environmental decision making. On the one hand, the interest-convergence of these two powerful currents in modern environmentalism has been a crucial element shaping the direction of environmentalism from the 1990s into the new century. There are now more voices than ever calling for the creation of democratic, sustainable communities and for a more comprehensive approach to environmental problems that address the connections between environmental, economic and civic health. Yet, despite the interest-convergence of these two powerful currents in modern environmentalism, there are dangers lurking at their intersection. This Essay argues that while devolved collaboration can theoretically ameliorate some regulatory inequities, it may also add renewed legitimacy to racial and class distributional inequities, further entrenching them in the landscape of environmental decision-making. Perhaps as importantly, devolved collaboration will introduce new equity problems in environmental decision-making by modifying current patterns of participation and representation in unforeseen ways. Like its predecessor decision making approaches, this evolving model, thus far, is indifferent to (or innocent about) the social structural and institutional conditions necessary to realize its own promises, including its aspiration of more equitable decisions. This Essay concludes that the movement toward devolved collaboration should best be regarded as the collective expression of a core set of normative principles that can guide the shaping of environmental decision making processes in a context-specific fashion. These normative principles can be used to tailor a mix of decision making mechanisms to specific environmental problems in particular ecological, social, economic, and political contexts. This contextualized approach brings with it the additional virtue of preserving the accountability of centralized authorities for ensuring fidelity to these principles in specific contexts instead of leaving this task to unaccountable, fragmented local groups.
下放合作时代的环境正义
本文考察了环境和自然资源机构将决策影响力下放给地方、多方利益相关者、协作团体的举措。诸如林业和流域伙伴关系以及社区咨询委员会等决策机制的出现,反映出需要以更有创造性的办法解决当前产生的环境问题,并需要改进决策过程,以查明和公平分配环境决策的成本和利益。在寻求更具参与性、地方性和整体性的决策机制的过程中,向下放合作的转变与另一个突出的运动——环境正义——相互交叉和汇合,这对环境决策的未来至关重要。本文考察了这两个重要潮流在现代环境决策中的趋同点和分歧点。一方面,这两股强大的现代环境主义思潮的利益趋同是决定20世纪90年代至新世纪环境主义走向的关键因素。现在比以往任何时候都有更多的声音要求建立民主、可持续的社区,并要求对环境问题采取更全面的办法,处理环境、经济和公民健康之间的联系。然而,尽管这两股强大的潮流在现代环保主义中利益趋同,但在它们的交汇处潜伏着危险。本文认为,虽然权力下放的合作在理论上可以改善一些监管不平等,但它也可能为种族和阶级分配不平等增加新的合法性,进一步巩固它们在环境决策领域的地位。也许同样重要的是,下放的合作将以不可预见的方式改变目前的参与和代表模式,从而在环境决策方面带来新的公平问题。像其前身的决策方法一样,到目前为止,这种不断发展的模式对实现其自身承诺所必需的社会结构和体制条件漠不关心(或一无所知),包括实现更公平决策的愿望。本文的结论是,向下放合作的运动最好被视为一组核心规范原则的集体表达,这些原则可以指导环境决策过程的形成,以特定的方式进行。这些规范原则可用于为特定生态、社会、经济和政治背景下的具体环境问题量身定制决策机制组合。这种情境化的方法带来了额外的优点,即保留中央当局的问责制,以确保在特定情况下忠实于这些原则,而不是将这项任务留给不负责任的、分散的地方团体。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
15.40%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The Harvard Environmental Law Review is published semiannually by Harvard Law School students. Views expressed in the Review are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of HELR members. Editorial Policy: HELR has adopted a broad view of environmental affairs to include such areas as land use and property rights; air, water, and noise regula-tion; toxic substances control; radiation control; energy use; workplace pollution; science and technology control; and resource use and regulation. HELR is interested in developments on the local, state, federal, foreign, or international levels.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信