The impact of a refurbishment programme on older people living in sheltered housing

IF 0.6 Q3 URBAN STUDIES
Z. Sattar, S. Wilkie, J. Ling
{"title":"The impact of a refurbishment programme on older people living in sheltered housing","authors":"Z. Sattar, S. Wilkie, J. Ling","doi":"10.1108/hcs-02-2021-0004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThis paper aims to explore residents' perceptions of a refurbishment programme to sheltered housing schemes and its impact on their well-being.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nThe methodology draws upon a realist evaluation framework. Four participatory appraisals (PAs) and 19 interviews with residents were conducted in the sheltered housing schemes. Ages of participants ranged from 50 to 99 years.\n\n\nFindings\nTwo categories of residents were identified: healthy active older adults and older frail adults (or over 85+). Residents said their social and emotional well-being improved from the provision of indoor and outdoor communal areas. Older frail residents only accessed the new communal spaces when staff took them in their wheelchairs. The physical changes increased opportunities for social connections for residents. Conservatories and sensory gardens were most popular. Residents felt that structured activities in the new spaces and digital training would improve their social activities.\n\n\nResearch limitations/implications\nThe participatory methods spanned over an hour, and some residents felt too tired to complete the full session.\n\n\nPractical implications\nA practical limitation was that some sensory rooms were not fully completed at the time of the evaluation.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThis paper adds the following: Perceptions of residents of a refurbishment programme in sheltered housing and the impact on their well-being. Perceptions of residents about social activities after a refurbishment programme. Perceptions of residents about the impact of physical changes to their sheltered housing schemes and impact on their internal accessibility to the improvements.\n","PeriodicalId":43302,"journal":{"name":"Housing Care and Support","volume":"39 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Housing Care and Support","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/hcs-02-2021-0004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"URBAN STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose This paper aims to explore residents' perceptions of a refurbishment programme to sheltered housing schemes and its impact on their well-being. Design/methodology/approach The methodology draws upon a realist evaluation framework. Four participatory appraisals (PAs) and 19 interviews with residents were conducted in the sheltered housing schemes. Ages of participants ranged from 50 to 99 years. Findings Two categories of residents were identified: healthy active older adults and older frail adults (or over 85+). Residents said their social and emotional well-being improved from the provision of indoor and outdoor communal areas. Older frail residents only accessed the new communal spaces when staff took them in their wheelchairs. The physical changes increased opportunities for social connections for residents. Conservatories and sensory gardens were most popular. Residents felt that structured activities in the new spaces and digital training would improve their social activities. Research limitations/implications The participatory methods spanned over an hour, and some residents felt too tired to complete the full session. Practical implications A practical limitation was that some sensory rooms were not fully completed at the time of the evaluation. Originality/value This paper adds the following: Perceptions of residents of a refurbishment programme in sheltered housing and the impact on their well-being. Perceptions of residents about social activities after a refurbishment programme. Perceptions of residents about the impact of physical changes to their sheltered housing schemes and impact on their internal accessibility to the improvements.
翻新方案对住在庇护住房的老年人的影响
本文旨在探讨居民对庇护住房计划翻新计划的看法及其对他们福祉的影响。设计/方法/方法该方法借鉴了现实主义的评估框架。在庇护房屋计划内进行了四次参与性评估和19次与居民的访谈。参与者的年龄从50岁到99岁不等。研究发现,居民分为两类:健康活跃的老年人和体弱多病的老年人(或85岁以上)。居民们表示,室内和室外公共区域的提供改善了他们的社交和情感健康。年老体弱的居民只有在工作人员把他们放在轮椅上的时候才能进入新的公共空间。身体上的变化为居民增加了社会联系的机会。温室和感官花园最受欢迎。居民们认为,新空间中的结构化活动和数字培训将改善他们的社交活动。研究局限/启示参与式方法持续了一个多小时,一些居民感到太累而无法完成整个会话。实际意义一个实际的限制是一些感官室在评估时没有完全完成。原创性/价值本文增加了以下内容:居民对庇护住房翻新计划的看法及其对他们福祉的影响。翻新后居民对社会活动的看法。居民对其庇护住房计划的物理变化的影响以及对其内部可达性的影响的看法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Housing Care and Support
Housing Care and Support URBAN STUDIES-
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
11.10%
发文量
13
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信