A Case Study in Planning and Executing a Source-Control Exercise Using a Visual Simulator as a Well Response Training Tool

R. Oskarsen, Brett Morry, Michael Drieu
{"title":"A Case Study in Planning and Executing a Source-Control Exercise Using a Visual Simulator as a Well Response Training Tool","authors":"R. Oskarsen, Brett Morry, Michael Drieu","doi":"10.7901/2169-3358-2021.1.678594","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Since the 2010 Macondo incident, the oil industry has made many strides in improving offshore blowout prevention and preparedness. This includes manufacturing over 20 large subsea capping stacks with other supporting subsea source control equipment (e.g. cutting tools for debris removal, injection and monitoring equipment for subsea dispersants) , and routinely conducting emergency exercises to demonstrate the ability to simulate deploying their subsea control equipment defined in their source control emergency response plans, often on short notice for government initiated unannounced exercises. In 2017, Anadarko partnered with U.S. and Mexican government agencies to conduct a joint-preparedness exercise to demonstrate a binational response to a hypothetical pollution incident that would threaten the border zone of both countries. The exercise conduced in accordance with the Mexico – US (MEXUS) Plan, a bilateral agreement between both countries for offshore spill that would originate in one country and could impact the other country. Coordinating a drill that involved over 300 participants from multiple companies and organizations took several years. A short coming of previous similar exercises have been the lack of visualization and sense of realism. A fit-for-purpose visualization simulator was used improve the overall training and learning experience. The visual simulator is coupled with a dynamic multi-phase simulator to ensure that the physics of the blowout and intervention operations are as realistic as possible. The improved visualizations and physics of the source-control operation significantly improved the learnings compared to previous exercise events. This paper explains the general methodology for closing a capping stack, and, more importantly, the planning process that made the drill successful.","PeriodicalId":14447,"journal":{"name":"International Oil Spill Conference Proceedings","volume":"7 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Oil Spill Conference Proceedings","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7901/2169-3358-2021.1.678594","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Since the 2010 Macondo incident, the oil industry has made many strides in improving offshore blowout prevention and preparedness. This includes manufacturing over 20 large subsea capping stacks with other supporting subsea source control equipment (e.g. cutting tools for debris removal, injection and monitoring equipment for subsea dispersants) , and routinely conducting emergency exercises to demonstrate the ability to simulate deploying their subsea control equipment defined in their source control emergency response plans, often on short notice for government initiated unannounced exercises. In 2017, Anadarko partnered with U.S. and Mexican government agencies to conduct a joint-preparedness exercise to demonstrate a binational response to a hypothetical pollution incident that would threaten the border zone of both countries. The exercise conduced in accordance with the Mexico – US (MEXUS) Plan, a bilateral agreement between both countries for offshore spill that would originate in one country and could impact the other country. Coordinating a drill that involved over 300 participants from multiple companies and organizations took several years. A short coming of previous similar exercises have been the lack of visualization and sense of realism. A fit-for-purpose visualization simulator was used improve the overall training and learning experience. The visual simulator is coupled with a dynamic multi-phase simulator to ensure that the physics of the blowout and intervention operations are as realistic as possible. The improved visualizations and physics of the source-control operation significantly improved the learnings compared to previous exercise events. This paper explains the general methodology for closing a capping stack, and, more importantly, the planning process that made the drill successful.
使用视觉模拟器作为井响应训练工具规划和执行源控制演习的案例研究
自2010年Macondo事件以来,石油行业在改善海上井喷预防和准备方面取得了许多进展。这包括制造超过20个大型海底封井装置,以及其他配套的海底源控制设备(例如,用于清除碎片的切割工具、海底分散剂的注入和监测设备),并定期进行应急演习,以展示模拟部署源控制应急响应计划中定义的海底控制设备的能力,通常是在政府启动的临时演习中进行的。2017年,阿纳达科与美国和墨西哥政府机构合作,进行了联合准备演习,以展示对可能威胁两国边境地区的假想污染事件的两国反应。这次演习是根据墨西哥-美国(MEXUS)计划进行的,这是两国之间的一项双边协议,针对可能起源于一个国家并可能影响另一个国家的海上泄漏。协调一个涉及来自多个公司和组织的300多名参与者的演习花了几年时间。以前的类似练习的缺点是缺乏形象化和现实感。使用了一个适合目的的可视化模拟器来改善整体的训练和学习体验。视觉模拟器与动态多相模拟器相结合,以确保井喷和修井作业的物理情况尽可能真实。与之前的训练项目相比,源代码控制操作的可视化和物理效果的改进显著提高了学习效果。本文解释了封井装置的一般方法,更重要的是,介绍了使钻井成功的规划过程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信