“Where You Have to Bypass”: History, Memory, and Multiple Temporalities of Innu Cultural Landscapes

J. Gagnon, C. Desbiens, Éric Kanapé
{"title":"“Where You Have to Bypass”: History, Memory, and Multiple Temporalities of Innu Cultural Landscapes","authors":"J. Gagnon, C. Desbiens, Éric Kanapé","doi":"10.1353/aiq.2021.0026","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:Since the 1970s, many Indigenous Peoples in Canada have undertaken land claims negotiations under the Comprehensive Land Claims Policy. These negotiations have highlighted the restrictive and colonial legal framework within which Indigenous rights and titles have to be expressed in order to be validated by the Canadian state. Notions of occupation and continuity, more particularly, have been largely defined according to a unilinear vision of time and space, making cultural landscapes that gradually merged into colonial ones harder to claim as still occupied and holding meaning for the present generation. As a way to overcome these contradictions, and following its withdrawal from the land claims process in 2005, the Innu community of Pessamit has opted, among other avenues, to engage in a heritage project on an ancestral route that was significantly altered by hydro-development. Highlighting the way in which the meaning and value of the Uamashtakan portage trail was maintained and handed down through cultural memory and oral history, this article aims to develop a critical perspective on Quebec historiography, as expressed within the political and legal arenas of Canada’s land claims policy.","PeriodicalId":22216,"journal":{"name":"The American Indian Quarterly","volume":"1 1","pages":"361 - 399"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The American Indian Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/aiq.2021.0026","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract:Since the 1970s, many Indigenous Peoples in Canada have undertaken land claims negotiations under the Comprehensive Land Claims Policy. These negotiations have highlighted the restrictive and colonial legal framework within which Indigenous rights and titles have to be expressed in order to be validated by the Canadian state. Notions of occupation and continuity, more particularly, have been largely defined according to a unilinear vision of time and space, making cultural landscapes that gradually merged into colonial ones harder to claim as still occupied and holding meaning for the present generation. As a way to overcome these contradictions, and following its withdrawal from the land claims process in 2005, the Innu community of Pessamit has opted, among other avenues, to engage in a heritage project on an ancestral route that was significantly altered by hydro-development. Highlighting the way in which the meaning and value of the Uamashtakan portage trail was maintained and handed down through cultural memory and oral history, this article aims to develop a critical perspective on Quebec historiography, as expressed within the political and legal arenas of Canada’s land claims policy.
“你必须绕过的地方”:伊努文化景观的历史、记忆与多重时间性
摘要:自20世纪70年代以来,加拿大许多土著居民根据《综合土地索赔政策》进行了土地索赔谈判。这些谈判突出了限制性和殖民性的法律框架,在这个框架内必须表达土著人民的权利和头衔,以便得到加拿大国家的认可。更具体地说,占领和连续性的概念在很大程度上是根据对时间和空间的线性看法来定义的,这使得逐渐合并为殖民地的文化景观更难被称为仍然被占领并对这一代人具有意义。作为克服这些矛盾的一种方式,在2005年退出土地索赔程序之后,Pessamit的Innu社区选择了其他途径,在一条祖传的路线上参与一个遗产项目,这条路线被水电开发大大改变了。通过文化记忆和口述历史,本文强调了乌马什塔坎遗产的意义和价值是如何被保存下来并传承下来的。本文旨在从加拿大土地主张政策的政治和法律领域的角度,对魁北克史学进行批判。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信