Selma Ben Fraj, Amira Miladi, F. Guezguez, M. Ben rejeb, J. Bouguila, I. Gargouri, S. Rouatbi, I. Latiri, H. Ben Saad
{"title":"Does Ramadan Fasting Affect Spirometric Data of Healthy Adolescents?","authors":"Selma Ben Fraj, Amira Miladi, F. Guezguez, M. Ben rejeb, J. Bouguila, I. Gargouri, S. Rouatbi, I. Latiri, H. Ben Saad","doi":"10.1177/1179556519862280","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: Several studies raised the effects of Ramadan fasting on healthy adults spirometric data, but none was performed in children. The aim of this study was to compare the spirometric data of a group of faster adolescents (n = 26) with an age-matched non-faster one (n = 10). Methods: This comparative quasi-experimental study, including 36 healthy males aged 12 to 15 years, was conducted during the summer 2015 (Ramadan: June 18 to July 16). Three sessions (Before-Ramadan [Before-R], Mid-Ramadan [Mid-R], After-Ramadan [After-R]) were selected for spirometry measurements. Spirometry was performed around 5.5 to 3.5 h before sunset and the spirometric data were expressed as percentages of local spirometric norms. Results: The two groups of fasters and non-fasters had similar ages and weights (13.35 ± 0.79 vs 12.96 ± 0.45 years, 46.8 ± 9.2 vs 41.7 ± 12.6 kg, respectively). There was no effect of Ramadan fasting on forced vital capacity (FVC), forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1), FEV1/FVC, peak expiratory flow, and maximal mid-expiratory flow. For example, during the Before-R, Mid-R, and After-R sessions, there was no significant difference between the fasters and non-fasters mean FVC (101 ± 11 vs 99 ± 14, 101 ± 12 vs 102 ± 14, 103 ± 11 vs 104 ± 13, respectively) or FEV1 (101 ± 13 vs 96 ± 16, 98 ± 11 vs 97 ± 16, 101 ± 10 vs 98 ± 16, respectively). Conclusions: Ramadan fasting had no interaction effect with the spirometric data of Tunisian healthy male adolescents.","PeriodicalId":45027,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Medicine Insights-Pediatrics","volume":"30 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Medicine Insights-Pediatrics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1179556519862280","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5
Abstract
Purpose: Several studies raised the effects of Ramadan fasting on healthy adults spirometric data, but none was performed in children. The aim of this study was to compare the spirometric data of a group of faster adolescents (n = 26) with an age-matched non-faster one (n = 10). Methods: This comparative quasi-experimental study, including 36 healthy males aged 12 to 15 years, was conducted during the summer 2015 (Ramadan: June 18 to July 16). Three sessions (Before-Ramadan [Before-R], Mid-Ramadan [Mid-R], After-Ramadan [After-R]) were selected for spirometry measurements. Spirometry was performed around 5.5 to 3.5 h before sunset and the spirometric data were expressed as percentages of local spirometric norms. Results: The two groups of fasters and non-fasters had similar ages and weights (13.35 ± 0.79 vs 12.96 ± 0.45 years, 46.8 ± 9.2 vs 41.7 ± 12.6 kg, respectively). There was no effect of Ramadan fasting on forced vital capacity (FVC), forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1), FEV1/FVC, peak expiratory flow, and maximal mid-expiratory flow. For example, during the Before-R, Mid-R, and After-R sessions, there was no significant difference between the fasters and non-fasters mean FVC (101 ± 11 vs 99 ± 14, 101 ± 12 vs 102 ± 14, 103 ± 11 vs 104 ± 13, respectively) or FEV1 (101 ± 13 vs 96 ± 16, 98 ± 11 vs 97 ± 16, 101 ± 10 vs 98 ± 16, respectively). Conclusions: Ramadan fasting had no interaction effect with the spirometric data of Tunisian healthy male adolescents.
目的:几项研究提出了斋月禁食对健康成人肺活量数据的影响,但没有在儿童中进行。本研究的目的是比较一组速度较快的青少年(n = 26)与年龄匹配的非速度较快的青少年(n = 10)的肺活量测定数据。方法:选取2015年夏季(斋月:6月18日至7月16日)健康男性36名,进行比较准实验研究。选取三个时段(斋月前[Before-R],斋月中期[Mid-R],斋月后[After-R])进行肺活量测定。在日落前5.5至3.5小时进行肺活量测定,肺活量数据以当地肺活量标准的百分比表示。结果:两组空腹组与非空腹组年龄、体重相近(分别为13.35±0.79 vs 12.96±0.45岁,46.8±9.2 vs 41.7±12.6 kg)。斋月禁食对用力肺活量(FVC)、1 s用力呼气量(FEV1)、FEV1/FVC、呼气峰流量和呼气中最大流量均无影响。例如,在r前、r中和r后阶段,快速者和非快速者的平均FVC(分别为101±11 vs 99±14、101±12 vs 102±14、103±11 vs 104±13)或FEV1(分别为101±13 vs 96±16、98±11 vs 97±16、101±10 vs 98±16)之间没有显著差异。结论:斋月禁食与突尼斯健康男性青少年肺活量测定数据无交互作用。