Human trafficking and the modern slavery framing of the problem: Between rhetorical pathos and conceptual limitations

Donka Petrova
{"title":"Human trafficking and the modern slavery framing of the problem: Between rhetorical pathos and conceptual limitations","authors":"Donka Petrova","doi":"10.26565/2218-2926-2022-24-04","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Trafficking in human beings is a serious problem, which affects vulnerable groups disproportionately. Eastern European countries are among the most affected due to a variety of risk factors. Yet this problem often remains invisible to the mass public. The attempts to bring it into the public consciousness rely strongly on different rhetorical strategies. I argue that the way of social issue framing largely determines its public perceptions and reactions to it. This material examines human trafficking as phenomenon, its definitions and root causes, and then focuses on the framing of trafficking as modern slavery. This framing is made possible by the use of multimodality in media outlets and in prevention campaigns. I will apply the method of content analysis of images used in the Bulgarian digital press or for campaign purposes. The combination of text and imagery is a powerful tool to create the association of slavery, detention, and captivity. These associations are emotionally contagious and can generate pathos; they also convey the idea of a powerless innocent victim in need of rescue, which is a limiting view. The paper argues that this approach has both its positive and negative aspects, the latter being the risks of reductiveness and barriers to the deeper understanding of the problem, its underlying causes, and possible solutions. The alternative framing of this phenomenon as a human rights violation implies the necessity of not just “rescue and salvation” of individuals, but also structural changes in society.","PeriodicalId":62895,"journal":{"name":"科学24小时","volume":"39 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"科学24小时","FirstCategoryId":"1089","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26565/2218-2926-2022-24-04","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Trafficking in human beings is a serious problem, which affects vulnerable groups disproportionately. Eastern European countries are among the most affected due to a variety of risk factors. Yet this problem often remains invisible to the mass public. The attempts to bring it into the public consciousness rely strongly on different rhetorical strategies. I argue that the way of social issue framing largely determines its public perceptions and reactions to it. This material examines human trafficking as phenomenon, its definitions and root causes, and then focuses on the framing of trafficking as modern slavery. This framing is made possible by the use of multimodality in media outlets and in prevention campaigns. I will apply the method of content analysis of images used in the Bulgarian digital press or for campaign purposes. The combination of text and imagery is a powerful tool to create the association of slavery, detention, and captivity. These associations are emotionally contagious and can generate pathos; they also convey the idea of a powerless innocent victim in need of rescue, which is a limiting view. The paper argues that this approach has both its positive and negative aspects, the latter being the risks of reductiveness and barriers to the deeper understanding of the problem, its underlying causes, and possible solutions. The alternative framing of this phenomenon as a human rights violation implies the necessity of not just “rescue and salvation” of individuals, but also structural changes in society.
人口贩卖和现代奴隶制问题的框架:在修辞上的悲情和概念上的限制之间
人口贩运是一个严重问题,对弱势群体的影响尤为严重。由于各种风险因素,东欧国家受影响最大。然而,这个问题往往不为大众所知。将其带入公众意识的尝试强烈依赖于不同的修辞策略。我认为,构建社会问题的方式在很大程度上决定了公众对社会问题的看法和反应。本材料将人口贩运作为一种现象、其定义和根本原因进行审查,然后将重点放在将人口贩运视为现代奴隶制的框架上。这种框架是通过在媒体渠道和预防运动中使用多模式来实现的。我将应用在保加利亚数字媒体或竞选活动中使用的图像的内容分析方法。文字和图像的结合是创造奴隶制、拘留和囚禁联想的有力工具。这些联系在情感上是具有传染性的,可以产生悲情;他们还传达了一个无助的无辜受害者需要救援的想法,这是一种局限的观点。本文认为,这种方法既有积极的一面,也有消极的一面,后者是简化的风险,以及对更深层次地理解问题、其根本原因和可能的解决方案的障碍。将这种现象视为侵犯人权的另一种说法意味着不仅需要“拯救和拯救”个人,而且需要对社会进行结构性改革。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
6690
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信