Fog-Clearing and the “Irish Dimension” in Oscar Wilde’s Three Society Plays

IF 0.2 Q4 AREA STUDIES
R. Haslam
{"title":"Fog-Clearing and the “Irish Dimension” in Oscar Wilde’s Three Society Plays","authors":"R. Haslam","doi":"10.36253/sijis-2239-3978-14623","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Despite growing scholarly interest in how Oscar Wilde’s Irish heritage shaped the form and content of his creative works, critics exploring this area have paid less attention to his three society plays than to his fiction and his final play The Importance of Being Earnest. In seeking to rectify that imbalance, this essay first addresses the analytical implications of Wilde’s suggestion in 1893 that his own performed and planned society plays, along with certain works by his countryman George Bernard Shaw, constituted an “Hibernian” or “Celtic School”, whose key goals were to celebrate Henrik Ibsen, to deprecate theatrical censorship, and to extirpate the English “intellectual fogs” of Puritanism and Philistinism. Examining Wilde’s depictions of Puritanism, London society, and English national character in the three plays, the essay argues that their Irish facets turn out to be relatively modest in scale, consisting not of the allegorically encoded political commentaries previous critics claimed to discover in Wilde’s fiction and The Importance of Being Earnest, but instead strategies of plot, characterization, and dialogue designed to alert England to the urgent need “to clear” away its “intellectual fogs”.","PeriodicalId":40876,"journal":{"name":"Studi irlandesi-A Journal of Irish Studies","volume":"12 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studi irlandesi-A Journal of Irish Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36253/sijis-2239-3978-14623","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"AREA STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Despite growing scholarly interest in how Oscar Wilde’s Irish heritage shaped the form and content of his creative works, critics exploring this area have paid less attention to his three society plays than to his fiction and his final play The Importance of Being Earnest. In seeking to rectify that imbalance, this essay first addresses the analytical implications of Wilde’s suggestion in 1893 that his own performed and planned society plays, along with certain works by his countryman George Bernard Shaw, constituted an “Hibernian” or “Celtic School”, whose key goals were to celebrate Henrik Ibsen, to deprecate theatrical censorship, and to extirpate the English “intellectual fogs” of Puritanism and Philistinism. Examining Wilde’s depictions of Puritanism, London society, and English national character in the three plays, the essay argues that their Irish facets turn out to be relatively modest in scale, consisting not of the allegorically encoded political commentaries previous critics claimed to discover in Wilde’s fiction and The Importance of Being Earnest, but instead strategies of plot, characterization, and dialogue designed to alert England to the urgent need “to clear” away its “intellectual fogs”.
王尔德三部社交剧中的清雾与“爱尔兰维度”
尽管学术界对奥斯卡·王尔德的爱尔兰血统如何塑造其创作形式和内容越来越感兴趣,但在这一领域进行探索的评论家们对他的三部社会剧的关注比对他的小说和他的最后一部剧《认真的重要性》的关注要少。为了纠正这种不平衡,本文首先阐述了王尔德在1893年提出的建议的分析含义,即他自己表演和计划的社会戏剧,以及他的同胞乔治·萧伯纳的某些作品,构成了一个“希伯尼学派”或“凯尔特学派”,其主要目标是庆祝亨里克·易卜生,贬低戏剧审查制度,并消除英国的清教主义和庸俗主义的“知识分子迷雾”。研究了王尔德在这三部戏剧中对清教主义、伦敦社会和英国民族性格的描写,本文认为,它们的爱尔兰方面在规模上相对温和,不包括先前评论家声称在王尔德的小说和《认真的重要性》中发现的讽喻式的政治评论,而是情节、人物塑造、以及旨在提醒英国“清除”其“知识迷雾”的迫切需要的对话。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
18
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信