{"title":"From the Cold War to the Kosovo War","authors":"Vladimir Unkovski-Korica","doi":"10.3917/RECEO1.501.0115","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper traces the different approaches to foreign policy in the British Labour Party through the prism of its long-term relationship with Yugoslavia. It goes beyond caricatures of Labour and British policy as merely status quo powers in the Balkans. Relying on Yugoslav archival records, as well as secondary sources and the British press, the paper shows that Atlanticism was the dominant approach in the Labour Party from the early Cold War to the reconfiguration of international relations following the end of the Cold War. The roots of this orientation are traced to the dual class nature of the Labour Party as both a ruling class and working class party, which tied it ultimately to the geopolitical interests of the British state, but also created pressures towards a socialist foreign policy. That allowed Yugoslavia to rely on the Labour Party as a special interlocutor in the Western hemisphere in times of cooler relations with the USSR, but also as a potential ally in the country’s struggle to maintain foreign policy independence, despite economic dependence on the West. Nonetheless, the end of the Cold War changed priorities in Labour, with the Atlanticist wing quickly adopting a pro-interventionist line in Yugoslavia, following the US lead. The Left, previously distrusted in Yugoslavia because of its softness on the USSR, became the champion of anti-interventionist arguments. Both sides had had direct links with and experiences of Yugoslavia, but this paper argues it was domestic class interpretation of international affairs which determined post-Cold War alignments.","PeriodicalId":42660,"journal":{"name":"Revue D Etudes Comparatives Est-Ouest","volume":"103 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revue D Etudes Comparatives Est-Ouest","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3917/RECEO1.501.0115","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This paper traces the different approaches to foreign policy in the British Labour Party through the prism of its long-term relationship with Yugoslavia. It goes beyond caricatures of Labour and British policy as merely status quo powers in the Balkans. Relying on Yugoslav archival records, as well as secondary sources and the British press, the paper shows that Atlanticism was the dominant approach in the Labour Party from the early Cold War to the reconfiguration of international relations following the end of the Cold War. The roots of this orientation are traced to the dual class nature of the Labour Party as both a ruling class and working class party, which tied it ultimately to the geopolitical interests of the British state, but also created pressures towards a socialist foreign policy. That allowed Yugoslavia to rely on the Labour Party as a special interlocutor in the Western hemisphere in times of cooler relations with the USSR, but also as a potential ally in the country’s struggle to maintain foreign policy independence, despite economic dependence on the West. Nonetheless, the end of the Cold War changed priorities in Labour, with the Atlanticist wing quickly adopting a pro-interventionist line in Yugoslavia, following the US lead. The Left, previously distrusted in Yugoslavia because of its softness on the USSR, became the champion of anti-interventionist arguments. Both sides had had direct links with and experiences of Yugoslavia, but this paper argues it was domestic class interpretation of international affairs which determined post-Cold War alignments.
期刊介绍:
La Revue d’études comparatives Est-Ouest (RECEO), créée en 1970 par le CNRS, publie des travaux originaux de recherche portant sur le champ géographique européen et eurasiatique. Résolument comparative et pluridisciplinaire, elle accueille des articles relevant des diverses disciplines des sciences sociales (économie, sociologie, histoire contemporaine, droit, science politique, géographie…). La RECEO privilégie les articles proposant des approches conceptuelles et explicatives, des contributions au débat théorique et accueille les recherches empiriques qui rendent compte de la pluralité des espaces nationaux. Elle favorise la confrontation des idées, les échanges scientifiques et la coopération entre les chercheurs des différentes disciplines des sciences sociales et des différentes aires couvertes par la revue. Elle publie des articles en français et en anglais. Revue à comité de lecture, elle est indexée au niveau international.