ED Assembly: Introducing a Simple Method of Bringing Emergency Department Staff Together to Facilitate Improvement; A Report of a Real Experience

{"title":"ED Assembly: Introducing a Simple Method of Bringing Emergency Department Staff Together to Facilitate Improvement; A Report of a Real Experience","authors":"","doi":"10.22114/ajem.v0i0.212","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: The emergency department (ED) at Ashford and St Peter’s Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (ASPH) is a medium size department which sees around 260–300 patients per day. As a result of sustained demand, we continue to struggle to meet the four hour waiting target and face similar challenges of those of ED’s nationally. Working in a busy ED is challenging and demanding. specific challenges around communication and risks arise directly from the unique contextual demands of the ED environment. Objective: Aim being to improve the productivity of the ED team and find a mechanism to create a more supportive and enjoyable working environment within the department. Method: Our clinical leadership started looking for answer to improve communication among team members and to create a platform where there was no hierarchy and all team members could be directly involved in problem solving. With the support of the quality improvement (QI) team, ED assembly was born. The assembly is a simple method of regularly bringing together staff to facilitate improvement and better team working. It is a platform for effective communication and innovation, in which there is no hierarchy and everyone is encouraged to contribute. Results: The assembly runs to a routine; every other Wednesday at 11am, the team come together for just half an hour. The agenda is set by the team in advance and everyone is encouraged to contribute their ideas and items they wish to contribute to others. Here are some examples of the quality improvement initiatives that have been born out of ED assembly: ED board rounds, coding information, overdose proforma, timely completion of standard investigations, access to fracture clinic appointments, nil-by-mouth communication, safety huddles, patient safety and sepsis, inclusive improvement, adoption of the ED assembly model by other teams and etc. Conclusion: ED assembly has supported many small but effective QI initiatives and regular communications support timely feedback on progress and update on plan-do-study-act (PDSA) cycles, resulting in changes in the everyday practice and improved pathways of patient care.","PeriodicalId":94293,"journal":{"name":"Advanced journal of emergency medicine","volume":"4 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advanced journal of emergency medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22114/ajem.v0i0.212","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Introduction: The emergency department (ED) at Ashford and St Peter’s Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (ASPH) is a medium size department which sees around 260–300 patients per day. As a result of sustained demand, we continue to struggle to meet the four hour waiting target and face similar challenges of those of ED’s nationally. Working in a busy ED is challenging and demanding. specific challenges around communication and risks arise directly from the unique contextual demands of the ED environment. Objective: Aim being to improve the productivity of the ED team and find a mechanism to create a more supportive and enjoyable working environment within the department. Method: Our clinical leadership started looking for answer to improve communication among team members and to create a platform where there was no hierarchy and all team members could be directly involved in problem solving. With the support of the quality improvement (QI) team, ED assembly was born. The assembly is a simple method of regularly bringing together staff to facilitate improvement and better team working. It is a platform for effective communication and innovation, in which there is no hierarchy and everyone is encouraged to contribute. Results: The assembly runs to a routine; every other Wednesday at 11am, the team come together for just half an hour. The agenda is set by the team in advance and everyone is encouraged to contribute their ideas and items they wish to contribute to others. Here are some examples of the quality improvement initiatives that have been born out of ED assembly: ED board rounds, coding information, overdose proforma, timely completion of standard investigations, access to fracture clinic appointments, nil-by-mouth communication, safety huddles, patient safety and sepsis, inclusive improvement, adoption of the ED assembly model by other teams and etc. Conclusion: ED assembly has supported many small but effective QI initiatives and regular communications support timely feedback on progress and update on plan-do-study-act (PDSA) cycles, resulting in changes in the everyday practice and improved pathways of patient care.
急诊科会议:介绍一种简单的方法,把急诊科的员工聚集在一起,以促进改进;真实经历的报告
简介:阿什福德和圣彼得医院NHS基金会信托(ASPH)的急诊科(ED)是一个中等规模的部门,每天接待约260-300名患者。由于持续的需求,我们继续努力满足四小时的候诊目标,并面临着与全国急诊室类似的挑战。在一个繁忙的急诊室工作是充满挑战和要求的。围绕沟通和风险的具体挑战直接来自ED环境的独特上下文需求。目的:旨在提高急诊科团队的生产力,并找到一种机制,在部门内创造一个更支持性和愉快的工作环境。方法:我们的临床领导开始寻找解决方案,以改善团队成员之间的沟通,并创建一个没有等级制度的平台,所有团队成员都可以直接参与解决问题。在质量改进(QI)团队的支持下,ED组装诞生了。大会是一种简单的方法,定期将员工聚集在一起,以促进改进和更好的团队合作。这是一个有效沟通和创新的平台,没有等级制度,每个人都被鼓励做出贡献。结果:程序集运行到一个例程;每隔一周的周三上午11点,团队就聚在一起半个小时。议程是由团队事先设定的,每个人都被鼓励贡献自己的想法和项目,他们希望贡献给其他人。以下是一些因急诊科装配而产生的质量改进举措的例子:急诊科董事会查房、编码信息、过量形式、及时完成标准调查、获得骨折门诊预约、口头沟通、安全会议、患者安全和败血症、包容性改进、其他团队采用急诊科装配模式等。结论:ED大会支持了许多小型但有效的QI倡议,定期沟通支持及时反馈进展和更新计划-执行-研究-行动(PDSA)周期,从而改变了日常实践和改善了患者护理途径。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信