Prospective Analysis of the Surgical Outcomes after Semirigid Penile Implant and their Impact on the Patients’ and their Partners’ Satisfaction Rate Human Andrology

M. Roaiah, S. G. Din, Ahmed Abdul Rasool Khazaali, W. Saleh
{"title":"Prospective Analysis of the Surgical Outcomes after Semirigid Penile Implant and their Impact on the Patients’ and their Partners’ Satisfaction Rate Human Andrology","authors":"M. Roaiah, S. G. Din, Ahmed Abdul Rasool Khazaali, W. Saleh","doi":"10.21608/HA.2017.3553","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: The current study assessed the surgical outcomes of the semirigid implant and their impact on the patient’s and the partner’s satisfaction. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to highlight the essential role of both radial and axial rigidities in patients’ and partners’ satisfaction.Patients and methods: The study included 32 patients and their partners. Their penile duplexes and Rigiscan proved the diagnosis. Subcoronal approach was adopted to insert the implant. Structured interview was carried out to evaluate the surgical outcomes using a 10-question questionnaire to evaluate the patients’ and their partners’ satisfaction rate prospectively, at 1, 3, and 6 months, respectively. Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient or Spearman’s ρ was used.Results: In our patients, we found moderate satisfaction rates for the majority of both patients and their partners. The current study revealed that the majority of the study patients were complaining of poor radial rigidity and dropped penis, which had an adverse impact on the overall satisfaction of the patient. A significant relationship was revealed between reimplantation and poor radial rigidity. Age demonstrated a significant correlation with poor circumferential rigidity and dropped penis. As regards the female partners, they showed a significant positive correlation between their negative responses and poor radial rigidity.Conclusion: This study highlighted the adverse impact of poor radial rigidity on patient satisfaction rate, which can be avoided with proper surgical technique. In addition, proper counseling is essential, especially for older patients, about the possibility of poor radial rigidity and dropped penis as they may push them to remove the implant.","PeriodicalId":13018,"journal":{"name":"Human Andrology","volume":"26 1","pages":"7-14"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Human Andrology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21608/HA.2017.3553","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Purpose: The current study assessed the surgical outcomes of the semirigid implant and their impact on the patient’s and the partner’s satisfaction. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to highlight the essential role of both radial and axial rigidities in patients’ and partners’ satisfaction.Patients and methods: The study included 32 patients and their partners. Their penile duplexes and Rigiscan proved the diagnosis. Subcoronal approach was adopted to insert the implant. Structured interview was carried out to evaluate the surgical outcomes using a 10-question questionnaire to evaluate the patients’ and their partners’ satisfaction rate prospectively, at 1, 3, and 6 months, respectively. Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient or Spearman’s ρ was used.Results: In our patients, we found moderate satisfaction rates for the majority of both patients and their partners. The current study revealed that the majority of the study patients were complaining of poor radial rigidity and dropped penis, which had an adverse impact on the overall satisfaction of the patient. A significant relationship was revealed between reimplantation and poor radial rigidity. Age demonstrated a significant correlation with poor circumferential rigidity and dropped penis. As regards the female partners, they showed a significant positive correlation between their negative responses and poor radial rigidity.Conclusion: This study highlighted the adverse impact of poor radial rigidity on patient satisfaction rate, which can be avoided with proper surgical technique. In addition, proper counseling is essential, especially for older patients, about the possibility of poor radial rigidity and dropped penis as they may push them to remove the implant.
半刚性阴茎植入术后手术效果及对患者及其伴侣满意度影响的前瞻性分析
目的:本研究评估半刚性种植体的手术效果及其对患者和伴侣满意度的影响。据我们所知,这是第一个强调径向和轴向刚度在患者和伴侣满意度中的重要作用的研究。患者和方法:本研究包括32例患者及其伴侣。他们的阴茎复合体和Rigiscan证实了这一诊断。采用冠状下入路置入种植体。采用结构化访谈对手术结果进行评估,采用10个问题的问卷,分别在1、3和6个月对患者及其伴侣的满意度进行前瞻性评估。用斯皮尔曼秩相关系数或斯皮尔曼ρ。结果:在我们的患者中,我们发现大多数患者及其伴侣的满意度都是中等的。目前的研究显示,大多数研究患者抱怨桡骨刚性差和阴茎下降,这对患者的整体满意度产生了不利影响。再植与较差的径向刚度之间有显著的关系。年龄与阴茎周向刚性差和阴茎下垂有显著相关性。至于女性伴侣,她们的消极反应与较差的径向刚度之间表现出显著的正相关。结论:本研究强调了桡骨刚性差对患者满意度的不良影响,通过适当的手术技术可以避免这种不良影响。此外,适当的咨询是必要的,特别是对于老年患者,关于桡骨刚性差和阴茎下降的可能性,因为他们可能会迫使他们取出植入物。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信