Lower functional redundancy in “narrow” than “broad” functions in global soil metagenomics

4区 农林科学 Q2 Agricultural and Biological Sciences
Huaihai Chen, Kayan Ma, Yu Huang, Qi Fu, Ying Qiu, Jiajiang Lin, C. Schadt, Hao Chen
{"title":"Lower functional redundancy in “narrow” than “broad” functions in global soil metagenomics","authors":"Huaihai Chen, Kayan Ma, Yu Huang, Qi Fu, Ying Qiu, Jiajiang Lin, C. Schadt, Hao Chen","doi":"10.5194/soil-8-297-2022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract. Understanding the relationship between soil microbial taxonomic compositions\nand functional profiles is essential for predicting ecosystem functions\nunder various environmental disturbances. However, even though microbial\ncommunities are sensitive to disturbance, ecosystem functions remain\nrelatively stable, as soil microbes are likely to be functionally redundant.\nMicrobial functional redundancy may be more associated with “broad”\nfunctions carried out by a wide range of microbes than with “narrow”\nfunctions in which specific microorganisms specialize. Thus, a comprehensive\nstudy to evaluate how microbial taxonomic compositions correlate with\nbroad and narrow functional profiles is necessary. Here, we\nevaluated soil metagenomes worldwide to assess whether functional and\ntaxonomic diversities differ significantly between the five broad and\nthe five narrow functions that we chose. Our results revealed that,\ncompared with the five broad functions, soil microbes capable of\nperforming the five narrow functions were more taxonomically diverse,\nand thus their functional diversity was more dependent on taxonomic\ndiversity, implying lower levels of functional redundancy in narrow\nfunctions. Co-occurrence networks indicated that microorganisms conducting\nbroad functions were positively related, but microbes specializing\nin narrow functions were interacting mostly negatively. Our study provides\nstrong evidence to support our hypothesis that functional redundancy is\nsignificantly different between broad and narrow functions in soil\nmicrobes, as the association of functional diversity with taxonomy was\ngreater in the five narrow than in the five broad functions.\n","PeriodicalId":22015,"journal":{"name":"Soil Science","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Soil Science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-8-297-2022","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Abstract. Understanding the relationship between soil microbial taxonomic compositions and functional profiles is essential for predicting ecosystem functions under various environmental disturbances. However, even though microbial communities are sensitive to disturbance, ecosystem functions remain relatively stable, as soil microbes are likely to be functionally redundant. Microbial functional redundancy may be more associated with “broad” functions carried out by a wide range of microbes than with “narrow” functions in which specific microorganisms specialize. Thus, a comprehensive study to evaluate how microbial taxonomic compositions correlate with broad and narrow functional profiles is necessary. Here, we evaluated soil metagenomes worldwide to assess whether functional and taxonomic diversities differ significantly between the five broad and the five narrow functions that we chose. Our results revealed that, compared with the five broad functions, soil microbes capable of performing the five narrow functions were more taxonomically diverse, and thus their functional diversity was more dependent on taxonomic diversity, implying lower levels of functional redundancy in narrow functions. Co-occurrence networks indicated that microorganisms conducting broad functions were positively related, but microbes specializing in narrow functions were interacting mostly negatively. Our study provides strong evidence to support our hypothesis that functional redundancy is significantly different between broad and narrow functions in soil microbes, as the association of functional diversity with taxonomy was greater in the five narrow than in the five broad functions.
全球土壤宏基因组中“狭义”功能的功能冗余度低于“广义”功能
摘要了解土壤微生物分类组成与功能剖面之间的关系,对预测不同环境干扰下的生态系统功能具有重要意义。然而,即使微生物群落对干扰很敏感,生态系统功能仍然相对稳定,因为土壤微生物可能是功能冗余的。微生物功能冗余可能更多地与多种微生物执行的“广泛”功能有关,而不是与特定微生物专门执行的“狭隘”功能有关。因此,有必要进行全面的研究来评估微生物分类组成与广义和狭义功能谱之间的关系。在这里,我们评估了世界范围内的土壤宏基因组,以评估我们选择的五个广义和五个狭义功能之间的功能和分类多样性是否存在显着差异。结果表明,与5种广义功能相比,能够执行5种狭义功能的土壤微生物具有更大的分类多样性,因此它们的功能多样性更依赖于分类多样性,这意味着狭义功能的功能冗余程度较低。共现网络表明,执行广泛功能的微生物是正相关的,而专门从事狭窄功能的微生物主要是负相互作用。我们的研究提供了强有力的证据来支持我们的假设,即土壤微生物的广义和狭义功能之间的功能冗余显着不同,因为五个狭义功能的功能多样性与分类的关联大于五个广义功能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Soil Science
Soil Science 农林科学-土壤科学
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
4.4 months
期刊介绍: Cessation.Soil Science satisfies the professional needs of all scientists and laboratory personnel involved in soil and plant research by publishing primary research reports and critical reviews of basic and applied soil science, especially as it relates to soil and plant studies and general environmental soil science. Each month, Soil Science presents authoritative research articles from an impressive array of discipline: soil chemistry and biochemistry, physics, fertility and nutrition, soil genesis and morphology, soil microbiology and mineralogy. Of immediate relevance to soil scientists-both industrial and academic-this unique publication also has long-range value for agronomists and environmental scientists.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信