Mindfulness for teachers: notes toward a discursive cartography

IF 0.6 Q3 HISTORY OF SOCIAL SCIENCES
R. Low
{"title":"Mindfulness for teachers: notes toward a discursive cartography","authors":"R. Low","doi":"10.1108/HER-12-2018-0030","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nFor the interested teacher, teacher educator and educational researcher seeking an entry point into how mindfulness relates to teachers’ work, the burgeoning and divergent appeals for the relevance of mindfulness to teachers can be bewildering. The purpose of this paper is to offer teachers, teacher educators and educational researchers a conceptual framework for understanding the different orientations and sources of mindfulness as it has been recommended to teachers.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nUsing Foucault’s (1972) concept of “discursive formations” as a heuristic device, this paper argues that mindfulness as pitched to teachers can be helpfully understood as arising from three distinct orientations.\n\n\nFindings\nStatements about mindfulness and its relevance to teachers emerge from three distinct discursive formations – traditional, psychological and engaged – that each constitute the “problem” faced by teachers respectively as suffering, stress or alienation. Specific conceptions of mindfulness are then advanced as a solution to these problems by certain authoritative subjects and institutions in ways that are taken as legitimate within each discursive formation.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nApart from offering a historical and discursive mapping of the different discursive formations from which mindfulness is pitched to teachers, this paper also highlights how each of these orientations impies a normative view of what a teacher should be. Suggestions for further historical research are also offered along the lines of genealogy, epistemology and ontology.\n","PeriodicalId":43049,"journal":{"name":"History of Education Review","volume":"82 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"History of Education Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/HER-12-2018-0030","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HISTORY OF SOCIAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Purpose For the interested teacher, teacher educator and educational researcher seeking an entry point into how mindfulness relates to teachers’ work, the burgeoning and divergent appeals for the relevance of mindfulness to teachers can be bewildering. The purpose of this paper is to offer teachers, teacher educators and educational researchers a conceptual framework for understanding the different orientations and sources of mindfulness as it has been recommended to teachers. Design/methodology/approach Using Foucault’s (1972) concept of “discursive formations” as a heuristic device, this paper argues that mindfulness as pitched to teachers can be helpfully understood as arising from three distinct orientations. Findings Statements about mindfulness and its relevance to teachers emerge from three distinct discursive formations – traditional, psychological and engaged – that each constitute the “problem” faced by teachers respectively as suffering, stress or alienation. Specific conceptions of mindfulness are then advanced as a solution to these problems by certain authoritative subjects and institutions in ways that are taken as legitimate within each discursive formation. Originality/value Apart from offering a historical and discursive mapping of the different discursive formations from which mindfulness is pitched to teachers, this paper also highlights how each of these orientations impies a normative view of what a teacher should be. Suggestions for further historical research are also offered along the lines of genealogy, epistemology and ontology.
教师的正念:走向话语制图的笔记
对于感兴趣的教师、教师教育者和教育研究者来说,寻找正念如何与教师工作相关的切入点,对于正念与教师相关的新兴和不同的诉求可能令人困惑。本文的目的是为教师、教师教育者和教育研究者提供一个概念框架,以理解正念的不同取向和来源,因为它已经被推荐给教师。设计/方法论/方法使用福柯(1972)的“话语形成”概念作为启发式工具,本文认为,向教师提出的正念可以被理解为来自三个不同的方向。关于正念及其与教师的相关性的陈述来自三种不同的话语形式——传统的、心理的和参与的——每一种都构成了教师所面临的“问题”,分别是痛苦、压力或疏离。然后,特定的正念概念被某些权威主体和机构提出,作为这些问题的解决方案,在每个话语结构中都被认为是合法的。原创性/价值除了提供不同话语形式的历史和话语映射之外,本文还强调了这些取向如何暗示了教师应该成为什么样的规范性观点。此外,本文还从系谱学、认识论和本体论的角度对进一步的历史研究提出了建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
History of Education Review
History of Education Review HISTORY OF SOCIAL SCIENCES-
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信