Abstract 3353: Four vs six cycles of docetaxel and cyclophosphamide (TC) in early stage triple-negative breast cancer

A. Basu, H. Mohammed, S. Mahmood, V. Dabak, R. Loutfi
{"title":"Abstract 3353: Four vs six cycles of docetaxel and cyclophosphamide (TC) in early stage triple-negative breast cancer","authors":"A. Basu, H. Mohammed, S. Mahmood, V. Dabak, R. Loutfi","doi":"10.1158/1538-7445.AM2019-3353","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: ABC trials established the use of non-anthracycline containing regimen, docetaxel and cyclophosphamide (TC) in the adjuvant setting in early stage breast cancer. In clinical practice, TC is commonly used in Stage I Triple-Negative Breast Cancer (TNBC). However, no specific recommendations exist in literature, regarding the number of cycles that can be used. i.e. TC4 vs TC6. Our aim, was to determine if TC4 is non-inferior to TC6 when used as adjuvant therapy in early stage TNBC. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 77 patients who were diagnosed with early stage TNBC between 2007 to 2017, at our institution who had received either TC4 or TC6 as adjuvant therapy. The number of cycles the patients received were based on provider preference. The two groups (TC4, TC6) were compared in regard to stage of cancer at diagnosis based on AJCC 7thedition, grade of adverse events, recurrence and death from breast cancer recurrence. Results: Out of 77 patients, based on T stage, 25 (32.5%) were T1b, 38(49.4%) were T1c, 13(16.9%) were T2 and 1(1.3%) was T3. All patients were node negative. 53(68.8%) received TC4 and 24(31.2%) received TC6. Regarding side effects, adverse of any grade were seen in 42(79.2%) patients who received TC4 and 23(95.8%) in patients who received TC6(p=0.091). Adverse events which were grade 3 or higher were seen in 7(15.9%) in TC4 group and 3(13%) in the TC6 group (p=1.000). Recurrence in the TC4 group was seen in 4 patients (7.5%) and 3(12.5%) patient in the TC6 group (p=0.259). Death due to breast cancer recurrence was seen in 1 patient (1.9%) in the TC4 group and 1(4.1%) patient in the TC6 group. Conclusions: In this limited series, TC4 appears to be equally effective to TC6, with fewer adverse events of any grade. However, a longer follow up and a larger patient base is required to be studied for a more definitive conclusion. Citation Format: Aparna Basu, Hadi A. Mohammed, Sharmeen Mahmood, Vrushali Dabak, Randa Loutfi. Four vs six cycles of docetaxel and cyclophosphamide (TC) in early stage triple-negative breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2019; 2019 Mar 29-Apr 3; Atlanta, GA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(13 Suppl):Abstract nr 3353.","PeriodicalId":21579,"journal":{"name":"Science and Health Policy","volume":"50 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Science and Health Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1158/1538-7445.AM2019-3353","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: ABC trials established the use of non-anthracycline containing regimen, docetaxel and cyclophosphamide (TC) in the adjuvant setting in early stage breast cancer. In clinical practice, TC is commonly used in Stage I Triple-Negative Breast Cancer (TNBC). However, no specific recommendations exist in literature, regarding the number of cycles that can be used. i.e. TC4 vs TC6. Our aim, was to determine if TC4 is non-inferior to TC6 when used as adjuvant therapy in early stage TNBC. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 77 patients who were diagnosed with early stage TNBC between 2007 to 2017, at our institution who had received either TC4 or TC6 as adjuvant therapy. The number of cycles the patients received were based on provider preference. The two groups (TC4, TC6) were compared in regard to stage of cancer at diagnosis based on AJCC 7thedition, grade of adverse events, recurrence and death from breast cancer recurrence. Results: Out of 77 patients, based on T stage, 25 (32.5%) were T1b, 38(49.4%) were T1c, 13(16.9%) were T2 and 1(1.3%) was T3. All patients were node negative. 53(68.8%) received TC4 and 24(31.2%) received TC6. Regarding side effects, adverse of any grade were seen in 42(79.2%) patients who received TC4 and 23(95.8%) in patients who received TC6(p=0.091). Adverse events which were grade 3 or higher were seen in 7(15.9%) in TC4 group and 3(13%) in the TC6 group (p=1.000). Recurrence in the TC4 group was seen in 4 patients (7.5%) and 3(12.5%) patient in the TC6 group (p=0.259). Death due to breast cancer recurrence was seen in 1 patient (1.9%) in the TC4 group and 1(4.1%) patient in the TC6 group. Conclusions: In this limited series, TC4 appears to be equally effective to TC6, with fewer adverse events of any grade. However, a longer follow up and a larger patient base is required to be studied for a more definitive conclusion. Citation Format: Aparna Basu, Hadi A. Mohammed, Sharmeen Mahmood, Vrushali Dabak, Randa Loutfi. Four vs six cycles of docetaxel and cyclophosphamide (TC) in early stage triple-negative breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2019; 2019 Mar 29-Apr 3; Atlanta, GA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(13 Suppl):Abstract nr 3353.
摘要:多西紫杉醇和环磷酰胺(TC)治疗早期三阴性乳腺癌4 vs 6个周期
背景:ABC试验确定了在早期乳腺癌的辅助治疗中使用非蒽环类药物方案,多西他赛和环磷酰胺(TC)。在临床实践中,TC通常用于I期三阴性乳腺癌(TNBC)。然而,关于可以使用的循环次数,文献中没有具体的建议。即TC4 vs TC6。我们的目的是确定TC4作为早期TNBC辅助治疗时是否优于TC6。方法:我们回顾性分析了2007年至2017年在我院接受TC4或TC6辅助治疗的77例早期TNBC患者。患者接受的周期数是基于提供者的偏好。比较两组(TC4、TC6)在AJCC 7诊断时的癌症分期、不良事件分级、乳腺癌复发及死亡情况。结果:77例患者中,根据T分期,T1b 25例(32.5%),T1c 38例(49.4%),T2 13例(16.9%),T3 1例(1.3%)。所有患者均为淋巴结阴性。53例(68.8%)接受TC4, 24例(31.2%)接受TC6。在副作用方面,接受TC4的患者中有42例(79.2%)出现不良反应,接受TC6的患者中有23例(95.8%)出现不良反应(p=0.091)。TC4组出现3级及以上不良事件7例(15.9%),TC6组出现3例(13%)(p=1.000)。TC4组复发4例(7.5%),TC6组复发3例(12.5%)(p=0.259)。TC4组和TC6组分别有1例(1.9%)和1例(4.1%)患者因乳腺癌复发死亡。结论:在这个有限的系列中,TC4似乎与TC6同样有效,任何级别的不良事件都更少。然而,为了得出更明确的结论,需要更长的随访时间和更大的患者基础进行研究。引文格式:Aparna Basu, Hadi A. Mohammed, Sharmeen Mahmood, Vrushali Dabak, Randa lutfi。多西紫杉醇和环磷酰胺(TC)治疗早期三阴性乳腺癌的4 vs 6个周期[摘要]。摘自:2019年美国癌症研究协会年会论文集;2019年3月29日至4月3日;亚特兰大,乔治亚州。费城(PA): AACR;癌症杂志,2019;79(13增刊):摘要nr 3353。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信