Body

IF 0.4 3区 文学 0 ASIAN STUDIES
D. S. Mini
{"title":"Body","authors":"D. S. Mini","doi":"10.1177/09749276211026079","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The body is a contested site that can mobilise an array of historically, culturally and socially specific meanings. While legal regimes conceive of bodies as fixed entities, they are malleable and respond to the social and ideological conditions that shape them. Varying scales of normativity and visibility make the body simultaneously a performative projection of desires and aspirations, and a space where the friction between tradition and modernity plays out. Embodied performances and practices become crucial to understanding the materiality of social arrangements that surround us, particularly those of power, relative privileges and knowledge systems (Foucault, 1978/1990). Here, the body is both a certain kind of biopolitical imaginary (an idea) as well as an ocular surface on which these imaginaries are played out (a form of visuality or representation). Bodily signifiers can also hint at a desiring subject shaped by commodified fantasies (Mazumdar, 2007; Ramamurthy, 2006). The body then can be read as a series of sedimented layers of signification (Schneider, 1997, p. 4) that are ruptured and mediated by varied extraneous factors (Sen & Basu, 2013). In the South Asian context, the body is a forcefield of caste, gender and class relations, as well as histories of colonial oppression which condition how they are represented and narrativised. These hierarchies often determine what kind of bodies are allowed to take up screen space (and time), tying represented bodies to the social worlds from where they emerge. Cinematic conventions of frontality, song and dance sequences (Iyer, 2015; Mukherjee, 2018b), and fight sequences (Vitali, 2008) employ the actor’s body for specific ends. For instance, the display of physical agility and male muscularity has been shown to appeal to a range of transnational as well as nonmetropolitan, local desires (Bose, 2013; Ghosh, 2020), while the normalisation of the aesthetics of whiteness has helped make seemingly ‘foreign’ or ‘exotic’ female bodies palatable for the Indian audience (Basu, 2013; Chatterjee, 2017; Osuri, 2008; Rahman Niazi, 2018). The ideological proclivity to pronounce certain bodies as inadmissible within the realm of pleasurable film viewing creates exceptional figures who deviate from normative expectations. For example, the overweight female body of Tun Tun has been exploited as a repository of humour as such fat bodies can only fit certain imaginations of grotesqueness or ludicrousness in the hegemonic imagination (Sinha, 2017). Or certain bodies – disabled bodies and lower-caste bodies for example – disappear in the","PeriodicalId":51959,"journal":{"name":"Bioscope-South Asian Screen Studies","volume":"28 1","pages":"39 - 42"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bioscope-South Asian Screen Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/09749276211026079","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ASIAN STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The body is a contested site that can mobilise an array of historically, culturally and socially specific meanings. While legal regimes conceive of bodies as fixed entities, they are malleable and respond to the social and ideological conditions that shape them. Varying scales of normativity and visibility make the body simultaneously a performative projection of desires and aspirations, and a space where the friction between tradition and modernity plays out. Embodied performances and practices become crucial to understanding the materiality of social arrangements that surround us, particularly those of power, relative privileges and knowledge systems (Foucault, 1978/1990). Here, the body is both a certain kind of biopolitical imaginary (an idea) as well as an ocular surface on which these imaginaries are played out (a form of visuality or representation). Bodily signifiers can also hint at a desiring subject shaped by commodified fantasies (Mazumdar, 2007; Ramamurthy, 2006). The body then can be read as a series of sedimented layers of signification (Schneider, 1997, p. 4) that are ruptured and mediated by varied extraneous factors (Sen & Basu, 2013). In the South Asian context, the body is a forcefield of caste, gender and class relations, as well as histories of colonial oppression which condition how they are represented and narrativised. These hierarchies often determine what kind of bodies are allowed to take up screen space (and time), tying represented bodies to the social worlds from where they emerge. Cinematic conventions of frontality, song and dance sequences (Iyer, 2015; Mukherjee, 2018b), and fight sequences (Vitali, 2008) employ the actor’s body for specific ends. For instance, the display of physical agility and male muscularity has been shown to appeal to a range of transnational as well as nonmetropolitan, local desires (Bose, 2013; Ghosh, 2020), while the normalisation of the aesthetics of whiteness has helped make seemingly ‘foreign’ or ‘exotic’ female bodies palatable for the Indian audience (Basu, 2013; Chatterjee, 2017; Osuri, 2008; Rahman Niazi, 2018). The ideological proclivity to pronounce certain bodies as inadmissible within the realm of pleasurable film viewing creates exceptional figures who deviate from normative expectations. For example, the overweight female body of Tun Tun has been exploited as a repository of humour as such fat bodies can only fit certain imaginations of grotesqueness or ludicrousness in the hegemonic imagination (Sinha, 2017). Or certain bodies – disabled bodies and lower-caste bodies for example – disappear in the
身体
身体是一个有争议的地点,可以调动一系列历史,文化和社会特定意义。虽然法律制度认为身体是固定的实体,但它们是可塑的,并对塑造它们的社会和意识形态条件作出反应。不同尺度的规范性和可见性使身体同时成为欲望和愿望的表演投射,也是传统与现代之间摩擦的空间。具体化的表现和实践对于理解我们周围的社会安排的物质性至关重要,特别是那些权力、相对特权和知识系统(福柯,1978/1990)。在这里,身体既是一种特定的生命政治想象(一种观念),也是一种视觉表面,这些想象在其上得以发挥(一种视觉或表现形式)。身体能指也可以暗示由商品化幻想塑造的欲望主体(Mazumdar, 2007;需要,2006)。然后,身体可以被解读为一系列意义的沉积层(Schneider, 1997,第4页),这些层被各种外部因素破坏和调解(Sen & Basu, 2013)。在南亚的背景下,身体是种姓、性别和阶级关系的力场,也是殖民压迫的历史,这些历史决定了它们的表现和叙述方式。这些等级通常决定了什么样的身体可以占据屏幕空间(和时间),将代表的身体与他们出现的社会世界联系起来。正面、歌曲和舞蹈序列的电影惯例(Iyer, 2015;Mukherjee, 2018b),和战斗序列(维塔利,2008)使用演员的身体为特定的目的。例如,身体敏捷性和男性肌肉的展示已被证明能够吸引一系列跨国以及非都市,当地的欲望(Bose, 2013;Ghosh, 2020),而白人美学的正常化有助于使看似“外国”或“异国情调”的女性身体为印度观众所接受(Basu, 2013;Chatterjee, 2017;Osuri, 2008;Rahman Niazi, 2018)。在令人愉悦的观影过程中,将某些身体视为不可接受的意识形态倾向创造了偏离规范期望的杰出人物。例如,Tun Tun的超重女性身体被利用为幽默的储藏库,因为这种肥胖的身体只能适应霸权想象中对怪诞或滑稽的某些想象(Sinha, 2017)。或者某些身体——例如残疾的身体和低种姓的身体——在宇宙中消失
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书