Peer-assisted learning in simulation-based medical education: a mixed-methods exploratory study.

IF 1.1 Q2 Social Sciences
BMJ Simulation & Technology Enhanced Learning Pub Date : 2020-12-16 eCollection Date: 2021-01-01 DOI:10.1136/bmjstel-2020-000645
Leo Nunnink, Andrea Thompson, Nemat Alsaba, Victoria Brazil
{"title":"Peer-assisted learning in simulation-based medical education: a mixed-methods exploratory study.","authors":"Leo Nunnink, Andrea Thompson, Nemat Alsaba, Victoria Brazil","doi":"10.1136/bmjstel-2020-000645","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Peer-assisted learning (PAL) is well described in medical education but there has been little research on its application in simulation-based education (SBE). This exploratory study aimed to determine the perceptions of senior medical students at two universities to teaching and learning in SBE using PAL (PAL-SBE).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Ninety-seven medical students at two universities working in small groups with facilitator oversight wrote, ran and debriefed a simulation scenario for their peers.This was a mixed-methods study. Participants completed a written free-text and Likert survey instrument, and participated in a facilitated focus group immediately after the scenario. Thematic analysis was performed on the free-text and focus group transcripts.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Student-led scenarios ran without major technical issues. Instructor presence was required throughout scenario delivery and debrief, making the exercise resource intensive. Participant responses were more positive regarding learning as peer teachers in simulation than they were regarding participation as a peer learner. Five themes were identified: learning in the simulated environment; teaching in the simulated environment; teaching peers and taking on an educator role; learning from peers; and time and effort expended. Perceived benefits included learning in depth through scenario writing, improved knowledge retention, understanding the patient's perspective and learning to give feedback through debriefing.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>PAL in SBE is feasible and was perceived positively by students. Perceived benefits appear to be greater for the peer teachers than for peer learners.</p>","PeriodicalId":44757,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Simulation & Technology Enhanced Learning","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8936843/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Simulation & Technology Enhanced Learning","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjstel-2020-000645","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Peer-assisted learning (PAL) is well described in medical education but there has been little research on its application in simulation-based education (SBE). This exploratory study aimed to determine the perceptions of senior medical students at two universities to teaching and learning in SBE using PAL (PAL-SBE).

Methods: Ninety-seven medical students at two universities working in small groups with facilitator oversight wrote, ran and debriefed a simulation scenario for their peers.This was a mixed-methods study. Participants completed a written free-text and Likert survey instrument, and participated in a facilitated focus group immediately after the scenario. Thematic analysis was performed on the free-text and focus group transcripts.

Results: Student-led scenarios ran without major technical issues. Instructor presence was required throughout scenario delivery and debrief, making the exercise resource intensive. Participant responses were more positive regarding learning as peer teachers in simulation than they were regarding participation as a peer learner. Five themes were identified: learning in the simulated environment; teaching in the simulated environment; teaching peers and taking on an educator role; learning from peers; and time and effort expended. Perceived benefits included learning in depth through scenario writing, improved knowledge retention, understanding the patient's perspective and learning to give feedback through debriefing.

Conclusion: PAL in SBE is feasible and was perceived positively by students. Perceived benefits appear to be greater for the peer teachers than for peer learners.

模拟医学教育中的同伴辅助学习:一项混合方法探索性研究。
简介:同伴辅助学习(PAL)在医学教育中得到了广泛的应用,但有关其在模拟教学(SBE)中应用的研究却很少。这项探索性研究旨在确定两所大学的高年级医学生对使用 PAL(PAL-SBE)进行模拟基础教育的教学和学习的看法:方法:两所大学的 97 名医科学生在主持人的监督下以小组形式为同伴编写、运行和汇报模拟情景。参与者填写了一份自由文本和李克特调查问卷,并在情景模拟结束后立即参加了一个焦点小组。对自由文本和焦点小组记录进行了主题分析:结果:由学生主导的情景模拟在运行过程中没有出现重大技术问题。在情景模拟和汇报的整个过程中都需要指导教师在场,因此演练需要大量资源。与作为同伴学习者的参与相比,参与者对在模拟教学中作为同伴教师的学习反应更为积极。共确定了五个主题:在模拟环境中学习;在模拟环境中教学;教授同伴并承担教育者的角色;向同伴学习;花费的时间和精力。他们认为这样做的好处包括:通过情景写作深入学习、提高知识保留率、了解病人的观点以及学会通过汇报给予反馈:结论:PAL 在校本教育中的应用是可行的,并得到了学生的积极评价。结论:在学生健康教育中开展 PAL 是可行的,学生对其评价也是积极的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMJ Simulation & Technology Enhanced Learning
BMJ Simulation & Technology Enhanced Learning HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信