Effects of flattening filter (FF) and flattening filter-free (FFF) beams on small-field and large-field dose distribution using the VMAT treatment plan

IF 0.7 Q4 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Dominika J. Plaza, Klaudia M. Orzechowska, K. Slosarek
{"title":"Effects of flattening filter (FF) and flattening filter-free (FFF) beams on small-field and large-field dose distribution using the VMAT treatment plan","authors":"Dominika J. Plaza, Klaudia M. Orzechowska, K. Slosarek","doi":"10.2478/pjmpe-2021-0016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Introduction: The aim of the study was to evaluate the influence of flattening filter (FF) and flattening filter-free (FFF) beams on small-field and large-field dose distribution using the VMAT treatment plan. Material and methods: Dose distribution calculations were performed for the VMAT technique in two locations: the larynx (small irradiation field; average 30.1 cm2) and gynecology (large irradiation field; average 173.1 cm2) using X-6MV flattening filter (FF) and flattening filter-free (FFF) beams. The following values were compared: the number of monitor units, minimum doses, average doses in PTV and maximum average doses in OaR (spinal cord – in larynx radiotherapy, bladder and rectum - in gynecological radiotherapy) and RPI (Radiation Planning Index) coefficient. Results and Discussion: The performed statistical tests indicate that there is a significant difference (p <0.05) between the number of monitor units in the irradiation of large (gynecological) fields between the FF and FFF beams. The dose distributions show no statistically significant differences between the flattening filter and flattening-free filter beams (regardless of the field size). Conclusions: Due to the smaller number of monitor units, it is recommended to use flattening filter beams (FF) for large-field radiotherapy.","PeriodicalId":53955,"journal":{"name":"Polish Journal of Medical Physics and Engineering","volume":"42 1","pages":"137 - 141"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Polish Journal of Medical Physics and Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/pjmpe-2021-0016","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Abstract Introduction: The aim of the study was to evaluate the influence of flattening filter (FF) and flattening filter-free (FFF) beams on small-field and large-field dose distribution using the VMAT treatment plan. Material and methods: Dose distribution calculations were performed for the VMAT technique in two locations: the larynx (small irradiation field; average 30.1 cm2) and gynecology (large irradiation field; average 173.1 cm2) using X-6MV flattening filter (FF) and flattening filter-free (FFF) beams. The following values were compared: the number of monitor units, minimum doses, average doses in PTV and maximum average doses in OaR (spinal cord – in larynx radiotherapy, bladder and rectum - in gynecological radiotherapy) and RPI (Radiation Planning Index) coefficient. Results and Discussion: The performed statistical tests indicate that there is a significant difference (p <0.05) between the number of monitor units in the irradiation of large (gynecological) fields between the FF and FFF beams. The dose distributions show no statistically significant differences between the flattening filter and flattening-free filter beams (regardless of the field size). Conclusions: Due to the smaller number of monitor units, it is recommended to use flattening filter beams (FF) for large-field radiotherapy.
采用VMAT治疗方案,平坦滤波(FF)和无平坦滤波(FFF)光束对小场和大场剂量分布的影响
摘要简介:本研究的目的是在VMAT治疗方案下,评估压扁滤波(FF)和无压扁滤波(FFF)光束对小场和大场剂量分布的影响。材料和方法:对VMAT技术在两个部位进行剂量分布计算:喉部(小照射场;平均30.1 cm2)和妇科(大照射场;平均173.1 cm2),使用X-6MV压扁滤波器(FF)和无压扁滤波器(FFF)光束。比较监测单元数、PTV最小剂量、平均剂量、OaR(脊髓-喉放射治疗、膀胱和直肠-妇科放射治疗)最大平均剂量和RPI(放射计划指数)系数。结果与讨论:经统计检验,FF束与FFF束在大(妇科)视场照射中监护单元数有显著差异(p <0.05)。剂量分布没有统计学上的显著差异在平坦滤波器和无平坦滤波器光束之间(无论场大小)。结论:大视场放射治疗中,由于监护单元较少,推荐使用平坦滤光束(FF)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Polish Journal of Medical Physics and Engineering
Polish Journal of Medical Physics and Engineering RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
19
期刊介绍: Polish Journal of Medical Physics and Engineering (PJMPE) (Online ISSN: 1898-0309; Print ISSN: 1425-4689) is an official publication of the Polish Society of Medical Physics. It is a peer-reviewed, open access scientific journal with no publication fees. The issues are published quarterly online. The Journal publishes original contribution in medical physics and biomedical engineering.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信