Regulation of Social Times during the COVID-19 Period: A Replication and Extension of the Work Activity Regulation Model

Hanen Khanchel
{"title":"Regulation of Social Times during the COVID-19 Period: A Replication and Extension of the Work Activity Regulation Model","authors":"Hanen Khanchel","doi":"10.5430/BMR.V9N3P14","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The present study replicates St-Vincent and al. in 2011 experience sampling study of the work activity regulation model and addresses health crisis issue, which replicates the original study’s findings. Results suggest that social times is regulated within each Tunisian manager. Individuals’ or collective optimal social regulation state changed from public and organizational policies, but results did not support the original study’s claim regarding social satiation. Similarly, the study showed a significant number of events involved a risk to their occupational health and safety. However, the thematic analysis reveals disparities in the distribution of risk events for the manager as well as the type of risks to which he is exposed during the COVID-19 period. So, there are a significant number of managers who were confronted with a risk to their health more than times when unforeseen events occur. These events experienced by Tunisian managers during the COVID-19 period can be stressful. In fact, in order to withstand the stress inherent in each of the life spheres, some people want to maintain a permeable border between work and non-work to avoid overflows from one to the other.","PeriodicalId":9554,"journal":{"name":"Business, Management and Economics Research","volume":"67 1","pages":"14"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Business, Management and Economics Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5430/BMR.V9N3P14","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The present study replicates St-Vincent and al. in 2011 experience sampling study of the work activity regulation model and addresses health crisis issue, which replicates the original study’s findings. Results suggest that social times is regulated within each Tunisian manager. Individuals’ or collective optimal social regulation state changed from public and organizational policies, but results did not support the original study’s claim regarding social satiation. Similarly, the study showed a significant number of events involved a risk to their occupational health and safety. However, the thematic analysis reveals disparities in the distribution of risk events for the manager as well as the type of risks to which he is exposed during the COVID-19 period. So, there are a significant number of managers who were confronted with a risk to their health more than times when unforeseen events occur. These events experienced by Tunisian managers during the COVID-19 period can be stressful. In fact, in order to withstand the stress inherent in each of the life spheres, some people want to maintain a permeable border between work and non-work to avoid overflows from one to the other.
新冠肺炎时期的社会时代规制:劳动活动规制模式的复制与延伸
本研究复制了St-Vincent等人2011年对工作活动调节模型的经验抽样研究,解决了健康危机问题,重复了原始研究的结果。结果表明,社交时间在每个突尼斯经理内部都是有规律的。个人或集体的最优社会调节状态随着公共政策和组织政策的变化而变化,但结果并不支持原始研究关于社会满足的主张。同样,该研究表明,大量事件涉及对其职业健康和安全的风险。然而,专题分析揭示了经理在2019冠状病毒病期间风险事件分布的差异以及他所面临的风险类型。因此,当不可预见的事件发生时,有相当数量的管理人员不止一次地面临健康风险。突尼斯管理人员在2019冠状病毒病期间经历的这些事件可能会给他们带来压力。事实上,为了承受生活中每个领域固有的压力,有些人希望在工作和非工作之间保持一个可渗透的边界,以避免从一个领域向另一个领域溢出。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信