Italy’s Intervention To WWI. The “Home Front” And The Psychological Heritage

F. Grassi
{"title":"Italy’s Intervention To WWI. The “Home Front” And The Psychological Heritage","authors":"F. Grassi","doi":"10.26577/jh.2020.v97.i2.01","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper aims to share the most updated results of the Italian and foreign historiography about howand why the Italians split on the opportunity to go to war joining the Entente powers and on the Italiansociety in the war years. The better part of the supporters of the intervention argued that the war was thegreat opportunity for completing national unity. Aside or behind this rational aim purposes such as imposingto Italian people an ordeal so to bring it to maturity and self-confidence were present. The leftist supportersof the intervention looked beyond the immediate territorial interests and aimed at the destructionof the “prison of the peoples”, to say the Habsburg Empire. One of them was Benito Mussolini, who usedto be a prominent left-wing socialist and traumatically broke with his comrades joining the pro-war front.Catholics, socialists and many liberals, in sum the majority of the country, did not desire the intervention,but their opposition was dull and passive. Italian intervention was largely a coup d’etat prompted by a violentminority. Nonetheless Italians accepted tamely the decision of the government and went to die in thetrenches. Only in 1917, and especially in Turin, there were serious troubles, which started due to shortageof essential goods. Even the Russian revolutions and the great Caporetto defeat did not push the socialiststo modify their loyal and passive attitude. The happiness for the final victory was from the very beginningpoisoned by the sensation that France and Great Britain inclined to give scarce satisfaction to Italy, especiallyin the eastern Adriatic shore and in Turkey. So, Italy emerged from the war in a psychological statecloser to the mood of a defeated country rather than to the mood of a victorious country.","PeriodicalId":83049,"journal":{"name":"The Hawaiian journal of history","volume":"18 1","pages":"4-11"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Hawaiian journal of history","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26577/jh.2020.v97.i2.01","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper aims to share the most updated results of the Italian and foreign historiography about howand why the Italians split on the opportunity to go to war joining the Entente powers and on the Italiansociety in the war years. The better part of the supporters of the intervention argued that the war was thegreat opportunity for completing national unity. Aside or behind this rational aim purposes such as imposingto Italian people an ordeal so to bring it to maturity and self-confidence were present. The leftist supportersof the intervention looked beyond the immediate territorial interests and aimed at the destructionof the “prison of the peoples”, to say the Habsburg Empire. One of them was Benito Mussolini, who usedto be a prominent left-wing socialist and traumatically broke with his comrades joining the pro-war front.Catholics, socialists and many liberals, in sum the majority of the country, did not desire the intervention,but their opposition was dull and passive. Italian intervention was largely a coup d’etat prompted by a violentminority. Nonetheless Italians accepted tamely the decision of the government and went to die in thetrenches. Only in 1917, and especially in Turin, there were serious troubles, which started due to shortageof essential goods. Even the Russian revolutions and the great Caporetto defeat did not push the socialiststo modify their loyal and passive attitude. The happiness for the final victory was from the very beginningpoisoned by the sensation that France and Great Britain inclined to give scarce satisfaction to Italy, especiallyin the eastern Adriatic shore and in Turkey. So, Italy emerged from the war in a psychological statecloser to the mood of a defeated country rather than to the mood of a victorious country.
意大利对第一次世界大战的干预“后方”与心理遗产
本文旨在分享意大利和外国史学的最新成果,即意大利人如何以及为什么在加入协约国的机会上分裂,以及战争年代意大利社会的分裂。大多数支持干预的人认为,这场战争是实现国家统一的大好机会。在这一理性的目标之外或背后,存在着一些目的,比如给意大利人施加一种折磨,使其成熟和自信。支持干预的左翼人士的目光超越了直接的领土利益,他们的目标是摧毁“人民的监狱”,也就是哈布斯堡帝国。其中之一是贝尼托·墨索里尼,他曾经是一位杰出的左翼社会主义者,与加入亲战阵线的同志们痛苦地决裂。天主教徒、社会主义者和许多自由主义者,总的来说,这个国家的大多数人,不希望干预,但他们的反对是迟钝和被动的。意大利的干预在很大程度上是一场由少数暴力分子发动的政变。尽管如此,意大利人还是顺从地接受了政府的决定,奔赴战壕赴死。只有在1917年,特别是在都灵,出现了严重的麻烦,这是由于必需品的短缺。即使俄国革命和卡波雷托的伟大失败也没有促使社会主义者改变他们忠诚和被动的态度。最后胜利的喜悦从一开始就被法国和英国倾向于给意大利,特别是在亚得里亚海东岸和土耳其难得的满足的感觉所破坏。因此,意大利在战后的心理状态更接近战败国的情绪而不是战胜国的情绪。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书