The Russian Invasion of Ukraine and the Future of Democracy in South Africa

IF 0.3 Q4 POLITICAL SCIENCE
J. Seekings, C. Saunders
{"title":"The Russian Invasion of Ukraine and the Future of Democracy in South Africa","authors":"J. Seekings, C. Saunders","doi":"10.35293/srsa.v44i1.4100","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The South African government and the ruling African National Congress shared the ambivalent responses of many African countries to the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022. Analysing the South African response to the invasion, in the United Nations General Assembly debate and elsewhere, this paper suggests that the country’s professed “non-alignment” or neutrality was misleading, for South Africa was more critical of Western countries (and Ukraine) than of Russia. The support for an imperially minded, undemocratic Russia cast doubt on South Africa’s commitment to liberal democracy. Statements by government officials and members of civil society after the invasion suggested that liberal democracy was tainted by its association with the West. The future of democracy in South Africa is likely to be further weakened by implicit or explicit alignment in the post-invasion world with Russia against the West, for the West is unlikely to strengthen its commitment to democracy in Africa in the face of the challenges posed by Russia and China, countries that have no interest in democracy. While surveys suggest that a majority of South African citizens want their democratic system to continue, the governing elite’s alignment with Russia is likely to weaken the country’s pro-democratic forces.","PeriodicalId":41892,"journal":{"name":"Strategic Review for Southern Africa","volume":"73 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Strategic Review for Southern Africa","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35293/srsa.v44i1.4100","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The South African government and the ruling African National Congress shared the ambivalent responses of many African countries to the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022. Analysing the South African response to the invasion, in the United Nations General Assembly debate and elsewhere, this paper suggests that the country’s professed “non-alignment” or neutrality was misleading, for South Africa was more critical of Western countries (and Ukraine) than of Russia. The support for an imperially minded, undemocratic Russia cast doubt on South Africa’s commitment to liberal democracy. Statements by government officials and members of civil society after the invasion suggested that liberal democracy was tainted by its association with the West. The future of democracy in South Africa is likely to be further weakened by implicit or explicit alignment in the post-invasion world with Russia against the West, for the West is unlikely to strengthen its commitment to democracy in Africa in the face of the challenges posed by Russia and China, countries that have no interest in democracy. While surveys suggest that a majority of South African citizens want their democratic system to continue, the governing elite’s alignment with Russia is likely to weaken the country’s pro-democratic forces.
俄罗斯入侵乌克兰与南非民主的未来
南非政府和执政的非洲人国民大会(African National Congress)对俄罗斯2022年2月入侵乌克兰的反应与许多非洲国家一样矛盾。本文分析了南非在联合国大会辩论和其他场合对入侵的反应,认为南非宣称的“不结盟”或中立具有误导性,因为南非对西方国家(和乌克兰)的批评多于对俄罗斯的批评。对具有帝国主义思想、不民主的俄罗斯的支持,让人怀疑南非对自由民主的承诺。政府官员和公民社会成员在入侵后发表的声明表明,自由民主因与西方的联系而受到玷污。南非民主的未来很可能会被入侵后世界与俄罗斯或明或暗的结盟所进一步削弱,因为面对俄罗斯和中国构成的挑战,西方不太可能加强其对非洲民主的承诺,这两个国家对民主没有兴趣。虽然调查显示,大多数南非公民希望他们的民主制度继续下去,但执政精英与俄罗斯的结盟可能会削弱该国的亲民主力量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
29
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信