ON SOCIAL EUROPE AFTER COVID-19; pp. 173–190

IF 0.5 4区 社会学 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
M. Aidnik
{"title":"ON SOCIAL EUROPE AFTER COVID-19; pp. 173–190","authors":"M. Aidnik","doi":"10.3176/TR.2021.2.02","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Europe, the old world, was the epicentre of Covid-19 after its initial emergence and incubation in China. Having resulted in vast human misery, the pandemic raises necessary questions about the future direction of Europe - what kind of Europe will emerge from the devastation - and, moreover, will the eruption of the European societies be used as an opportunity for changing, i.e. recalibrating Europe? The overarching concern of this article is social Europe, i.e. Europe with a commitment to 'good society', conducive to human wellbeing. The article analyses the response to the virus in Europe and by the European Union. It contextualizes the response within the framework laid by the Maastricht Treaty of 1992 and the handling of the sovereign debt crisis of 2010. Thereafter, I turn to the 'Manifesto for the Democratization of Europe' by leading French social thinkers from 2018, in order to discuss the reconstruction of the eurozone governance. I envision an alternative role for the European Central Bank: instead of continuing with the unsuccessful Quantitative Easing (QE) strategy, the ECB should use its capacity to pay people of Europe a temporal universal basic income, which could later be made permanent. Both the manifesto and universal basic income stand in tension to the status quo, yet remain firmly on the horizon of the possible - and necessary to restore human well-being to the guiding principles of the European political economy.","PeriodicalId":44498,"journal":{"name":"Trames-Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences","volume":"59 1","pages":"173-190"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Trames-Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3176/TR.2021.2.02","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Europe, the old world, was the epicentre of Covid-19 after its initial emergence and incubation in China. Having resulted in vast human misery, the pandemic raises necessary questions about the future direction of Europe - what kind of Europe will emerge from the devastation - and, moreover, will the eruption of the European societies be used as an opportunity for changing, i.e. recalibrating Europe? The overarching concern of this article is social Europe, i.e. Europe with a commitment to 'good society', conducive to human wellbeing. The article analyses the response to the virus in Europe and by the European Union. It contextualizes the response within the framework laid by the Maastricht Treaty of 1992 and the handling of the sovereign debt crisis of 2010. Thereafter, I turn to the 'Manifesto for the Democratization of Europe' by leading French social thinkers from 2018, in order to discuss the reconstruction of the eurozone governance. I envision an alternative role for the European Central Bank: instead of continuing with the unsuccessful Quantitative Easing (QE) strategy, the ECB should use its capacity to pay people of Europe a temporal universal basic income, which could later be made permanent. Both the manifesto and universal basic income stand in tension to the status quo, yet remain firmly on the horizon of the possible - and necessary to restore human well-being to the guiding principles of the European political economy.
covid-19后的社会欧洲;173 - 190页
新冠肺炎疫情最初在中国出现和孵化后,旧世界欧洲成为疫情中心。这场大流行病造成了巨大的人类苦难,对欧洲未来的方向提出了必要的问题——在这场灾难之后将出现什么样的欧洲——此外,欧洲社会的爆发是否会被用作改变即重新调整欧洲的机会?本文的首要关注点是社会欧洲,即致力于“良好社会”的欧洲,有利于人类福祉。本文分析了欧洲和欧盟对该病毒的反应。它将1992年《马斯特里赫特条约》(Maastricht Treaty)和2010年主权债务危机处理所奠定的框架作为应对措施的背景。此后,我转向2018年以来法国主要社会思想家的“欧洲民主化宣言”,以讨论欧元区治理的重建。我为欧洲央行设想了另一种角色:与其继续实施不成功的量化宽松(QE)战略,欧洲央行应该利用其能力向欧洲人民支付暂时的普遍基本收入,这种收入以后可能成为永久性的。《宣言》和普遍基本收入都与现状相悖,但它们仍坚定地站在可能的地平线上——这是将人类福祉重新置于欧洲政治经济学指导原则的必要条件。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
18
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信